Kevin Shaw |
September 18th, 2006 10:51 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Liu
the hvx gross pixel per sensor is 500K pixel each (Uses pixel shift to achieve higher resolution)...Where else the A1 and XL H1 are 1640k pixel, how significant is the difference...
|
In reviews comparing the XL-H1 to the HVX200, the actual resolution of the former is listed at around 800 TV lines while the latter is under 600 lines (barely better than a good SD camera). The catch is that HDV compression doesn't hold up as well for moving subjects as DVCproHD does, so depending on your subject matter that resolution difference may be negated somewhat. Also, DVCProHD records more color information, which also gains you something in terms of perceived image quality.
In practical terms, any of the low-cost HD cameras is capable of producing a nice image when used properly. They also have the advantage of having widescreen sensors like your XL2, so would make a good complement in that regard. Buy an HD camera and you could run it in widescreen SD mode for now until you figure out whether you want to go all HD, at which point you just need to get one more camera for a two-camera shoot. I recommend that approach unless you decide to just get another XL2.
Another advantage of sticking with Canon is that you might be able to share batteries with your XL2, assuming Canon hasn't changed their battery design for the XH-A1.
|