DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Canon XH Series HDV Camcorders (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-xh-series-hdv-camcorders/)
-   -   Focus issue solved, faulty camera now replaced (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-xh-series-hdv-camcorders/81207-focus-issue-solved-faulty-camera-now-replaced.html)

Brad Tyrrell December 26th, 2006 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Leith
Having said all that, I am happy with my A1, even with its flaws.

Me too. Even if I can't use the lens on "full-wide" because of the barrel distortion.

Annoyed me at first, then kinda realized what I was asking. A wide angle on a zoom lens on a wide format HD video cam with no fish eye at the edges for less than $4000. Jeesh.

On-the-other-hand, just a little off full-wide and it's very usable. Of course since I don't think anyone claimed no distortion, it's not really a "design flaw". (This probably belongs in a different thread anyway.)

Michael Mann December 26th, 2006 04:22 PM

Alex, do you think Canon is or has got aware of this problem or did they just try to get you satisfied, without going deeper into it? Did they give you any plausible comment on this "pulsing problem" or did they just send you a new A1 in exchange? Thanks.

Alex Leith December 26th, 2006 04:48 PM

I didn't actually get any commentary from Canon except for them to say that the camera was "definitely faulty" (they weren't specific as to which faults they were addressing).

My dealer brokered the repair on my behalf, so I was sent a replacement from the dealer's stock. I gave it a quick test when I received it, and it didn't appear to display the pulsing or other focus problems that I had with the first unit. As you know, I've now checked more closely, and the focus pulsing is still there on this unit - albeit less noticable.

Whether Canon knows about this or not... I don't know. It would seem like something that should have been picked up at the prototype stage. Perhaps they didn't notice it; or perhaps they were constrained by their budgets to use mechanical systems that are already in other Canon camcorders - which they just couldn't get to work "perfectly" in this form factor; or perhaps they noticed it too late to make changes to the design before it shipped out; or perhaps they hoped that no-one else would notice the problem; or perhaps it's a software problem... I don't know.

Either way, I feel it's something that Canon *should* fix given that it means you can't use the AF whilst zooming - which is something that I feel you would expect of a merchantable quality AF system. I know AF isn't perfect, and can *sometimes* have problems maintaining accurate focus, but this pulsing looks like a mechanical flaw, and is not something that one would expect of any AF system.

Whether they will fix it, or just update it with the next model is another matter entirely.

Tom Roper December 26th, 2006 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Leith
The back-focus on the lens should be setup in such a way that as you zoom in an out the focus stays the same (and in fact it does if you turn AF off).

Wrong!

If you video something moving away from you, (picture kids sledding down a hill), as you zoom so that the object continues to fill the frame while the subject distance is moving away from you, you would not want the focus locked on the first position of the sled when it was just a few feet in front because it would go out of focus as it draws farther away.

Canon gives you the option to turn autofocus off. That's enough. If it worked as you described in auto, you could only maintain static focus on a constant camera-to-subject distance while you zoom.

Raymond Toussaint December 26th, 2006 09:54 PM

Q. The focus issue Alex described is repaired and gone. That is his word.
Q. Zoom and focus in AF together the same time (how often do you want that? or work that way, but that is another question, I never do)

Focus is on subject in center of the screen, if you zoom, the image information in the center of the screen is changing, so is the focus. An object that was only for a small percentage in the center becomes the whole image. In 24F and 25F Canon has a very speedy AF compared to others.

The Canon has a Manual and TWO Autofocus systems, you can work with one of them or with two combined.

1. You can manually focus and zoom together.
1a.You can manually focus and zoom together and use Push Focus button on subject.

2. You can set focus on automatic end choose in menu:
a) AF normal autofocus (TTL)
b) IF instant autofocus (TTL and sensor, two way, fast)

If you choose for autofocus with (a)
You can focus and zoom together and hold the focusring during zoom.(override) and release if your zoom is finished.

If you choose for autofocus with (b) the system needs to recalculates faster the focus. You zoom and focus together. There is some "computerwork" but you can override the focus system by using the manual focus ring.

Normally always set everything on manual and use the push focus button if needed. Or if you want to use AF, not in the same time during the zoom, set cam to AF for easy focussing on moving object.

Alex Leith December 27th, 2006 03:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Roper
Wrong!

I'm talking about the back-focus setup. When you zoom a lens in-to, or out-from a stationery object the focal point of the lens should remain constant, ie. the object should stay in focus.

I'm not saying that the autofocus should be inactive whilst zooming. What we're talking about here is an focus "aretifact" that occurs when zooming on static objects.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raymond Toussaint
Q. The focus issue Alex described is repaired and gone. That is his word.
Q. Zoom and focus in AF together the same time (how often do you want that? or work that way, but that is another question, I never do)

1. Unfortunately I'd been a bit hasty is declaring ALL the focus issues gone. The pulsing happens on this camera too.
2. You're absolutely right, I barely EVER have the AF on - and we've all been taught that we shouldn't really be zooming in-vision (the human eye doesn't zoom).

My point is more to do with merchantable quality of goods. If Canon advertises a feature, then that feature should be usable. It is reasonable to expect that AF could be left on, as zooming in and out is normal behaviour whilst filming something. AF cannot be left on during very slow zooms on the long end of the lens, because it produces an unpleasant effect on screen.

It's like advertising a car that has self-leveling suspension, but not mentioning that you can't drive it up hills.

Michael Mann December 27th, 2006 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raymond Toussaint
Q. The focus issue Alex described is repaired and gone.

Unfortunately it is not. Please have a look at my example clips I posted earlier.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raymond Toussaint
Q. Zoom and focus in AF together the same time (how often do you want that? or work that way, but that is another question, I never do).

I do. I sometimes simply have no other choice since there is not enogh time to focus manually. Either AF or snapshot is gone.

I guess we all can live with this AF malfunction during slow zooms. But I completely agree with Alex that this pulsing is NOT what one would accept of any AF system - alll the less since Canon praises its design as new and revolutionary. The AF system of my former FX1 didn't pulse at all during slow zooms, so it never ruined a zoom shot like my new A1 does in AF.

Chris, as soon as you find the time please change the title of this thread, since the problem is NOT solved. The actual title is misleading for users - and for Canon, when they browse through user feedbacks to get input for a coming firmware update.

Philip Williams December 27th, 2006 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raymond Toussaint
<snip>
Zoom and focus in AF together the same time (how often do you want that? or work that way, but that is another question, I never do)
<snip>

Actually I have to admit that I do this sometimes at weddings. A slow zoom in on the bride and groom can play quite nicely, but a kung fu snap zoom would probably be... unwelcome. If I'm in manual focus and off a bit, it won't really show at the wide end - but would become apparent and quite awkward as the zoom nears the subjects. In this case its not something you can correct during the zoom since the lens doesn't allow you to focus while zooming.

Now having said that, let me clarify that I perceive this phenomena at 24F and don't plan to shoot weddings at that frame rate. I'd shoot a typical wedding at 60i unless requested otherwise, and I have not noted the pulsing zoom at 60i so I'm not concerned. However, since the pulsing focus is possibly related to the AF sampling rate, I could see this being an issue for PAL users under more typical shooting scenarios as opposed to NTSC users.

Raymond Toussaint December 27th, 2006 06:14 AM

Alex his camera was faulty and is replaced, he did not have the going in - out focus problems anymore. Canon fixed that matter. That you see minimal pulsing on the big screen while doing zoom in with AF on, is something you can avoid.

Michael: there are many very happy A1 shooters at work on the moment I did not hear anyone complaining like you do. You complain about everything.

Can you try to shake the camera hard (what you did before) while zooming with AF on at the same moment, and describe what is happening? If you can't see it on monitor, try a 42" screen, please report your findings.

Raymond Toussaint December 27th, 2006 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philip Williams
If I'm in manual focus and off a bit, it won't really show at the wide end - but would become apparent and quite awkward as the zoom nears the subjects.

If you track in and zoom in at the same time to 'soften' the starting point of the track you can do that with autozoom. You can (pre) manual focus and/or use the PUSH focus button to help you out.

Is done many times, professional lenses don't have autofocus, but have autozoom. Canon gave us the 3 ring lens, use it.

Raymond Toussaint December 27th, 2006 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Leith
My point is more to do with merchantable quality of goods. If Canon advertises a feature, then that feature should be usable. It is reasonable to expect that AF could be left on, as zooming in and out is normal behaviour whilst filming something. AF cannot be left on during very slow zooms on the long end of the lens, because it produces an unpleasant effect on screen.

It's like advertising a car that has self-leveling suspension, but not mentioning that you can't drive it up hills.

Hear you. But even zooming in the shot is something I only do for dramatic reasons, combining that with AF... I think normal AF is workable if you follow a moving object or pan from figure A to B and need to do refocus. If you use a mattebox, the AF Instant focus version is blocked anyway, so only nomal AF is working. And it works!

I think that Canon was so happy with the 'speedy AF two way instant focus system' that the marketing department only told you the goodies.. But I remember the Panasonic HVX200 without saying what the real CCD resolution was...

Michael Mann December 27th, 2006 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raymond Toussaint
Michael: there are many very happy A1 shooters at work on the moment I did not hear anyone complaining like you do. You complain about everything.

We all know that the A1 is a very good camcorder, that goes without saying. I am a (quite) happy A1 user myself. But I don't think it would bring users in this forum any further if we only sing our praises. To know the cams limitations - that's important as well. Because maybe weak points could get fixed in the future.

Therefore my intention is not to complain but to observe and to share. Period. And if there are weak points - I don't want to draw the curtain over them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raymond Toussaint
Can you try to shake the camera hard (what you did before) while zooming with AF on at the same moment, and describe what is happening? If you can't see it on monitor, try a 42" screen, please report your findings.

What exactly do you want me to find out? Please explain, thank you. (But I don't have a 42'' screen).

Michael Mann December 28th, 2006 09:07 AM

Informed Canon about focus pulsing problem
 
Meanwhile I had a phone call with Canon Service in Germany.
The service member promised to watch the demonstration clips (http://www.filefactory.com/f/f5656740836b15ad/) to unterstand the problem. And he promised to call me back as soon as possible.

I will keep you informed ...

Alex Leith December 28th, 2006 09:16 AM

Thank you Michael. I look forward to hearing what Canon have to say about this issue.

Michael Mann December 29th, 2006 03:47 AM

Received a phone call by Canon
 
I just received a phone call (conference call) by a Canon Service team in Germany:

(1) They had watched the two demo clips and they DID notice the focus pulsing problem. They asked me about further technical details (distance to object, f-stop).

(2) Their first guess was that the two clips show EXTREME lighting situations: low contrast boy in front of low contrast tapestry; low lit woman in front of bright background lighting. (I agreed but replied that the problem occurs under NORMAL lighting/contrast situations just the same.)

(3) Their second guess was that the problem might occur in long telephoto focal lengths and/or open iris zoom shots only. (I replied that more or less depth of field sure makes this problem less or more visible, but the pulsing DOES NOT DISAPPEAR in medium focal length and/or medium f-stop zoom shots.)

(4) Their final guess was that this AF pulsing is NOT FIXABLE - not even via firmware update - but probably is related to the design of the AF system. (I put into perspective that there ARE cams on the market that do not show this problem, e.g. the FX1.)

(5) The Service team promised to forward the information to Japan.


Chris, could you please change the title of this thread, since it may mislead fellow users as well as Canon when browsing through this forum. The problem remains NOT SOLVED. Thank you.

Gabor Tarnok December 30th, 2006 10:32 AM

I have exactly the same focus problem with my A1 (PAL). There is only one solution: disable AF and use manual focus. I would be also happy if Canon could fix it.

Nevertheless, the camera is really professional...

Alex Leith December 30th, 2006 10:43 AM

Thanks Michael for your report. I suspect current owners are not likely to see a fix, so as Gabor says, the only workaround for this "quirk" is to keep AF off.

In almost every other respect this is a great camera.

Tom Roper December 30th, 2006 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Mann
I just received a phone call (conference call) by a Canon Service team in Germany:

(4) (I put into perspective that there ARE cams on the market that do not show this problem, e.g. the FX1.)

Since I owned the Z1, I've got some perspective on that too. The Z1 could not auto-focus when shooting into the sun or strong backlighting. I think this is a case of selective memory where the grass always seems greener on the other side of the fence.

Shooting low contrast subjects at long focal lengths it seems you lacked proof and were not convincing to the Canon Service team that this is a serious problem.

Nothing is more irritating than when someone with a problem gets replies from others who say "mine doesn't do that!" And while I don't dismiss the seriousness of the problem for you, for me it's not happening at all. So while I have no idea how many cams are affected, I know that not all of them are.

But if I felt as strongly about it as you do, I would return or sell the A1 and go back to the Z1. But no regrets here. The A1 picture quality and control is superior, even given some of the other limitations like the smaller LCD screen or lack of an OIS button. The eyes have it.

Alex Leith December 30th, 2006 01:07 PM

Thanks Tom for your input.

Just to be clear, you're saying that your A1 does NOT show any symptoms of focus "pulsing" at long focal lengths in AF mode (in 24F or 30F)?

Makes me feel a little miffed that I've managed to get two units in a row that DO show this problem.

Still like you say, the picture quality is so much better than my FX1, and I leave AF on so infrequently that in lieu of any response from Canon, I'm happy to live with the quirk.

Tom Roper December 30th, 2006 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Leith
Thanks Tom for your input.

Just to be clear, you're saying that your A1 does NOT show any symptoms of focus "pulsing" at long focal lengths in AF mode (in 24F or 30F)?

I did not try 24F or 30F. No focus pulsing at 60i remotely resembling what you had in your first A1. Also your first clip, the one of the bag on the patio deck was not a long focal length. THAT test I tried to duplicate, i.e. a low contrast object from 8-10 feet and there was no hint of the extreme herky-jerky focus pulsing I saw in your video.

I will try 24F and 30F shortly and report my observation here.

Tom Roper December 30th, 2006 01:45 PM

Wait...Alex, tell me how you want me to run the test, so I can best duplicate the conditions.

Philip Williams December 30th, 2006 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Roper
<snip>
I will try 24F and 30F shortly and report my observation here.

Looking forward to your findings Tom. I've been able create shots that have focus pulsing in 24F but nothing but perfect focus in 60i (haven't tested 30F).

Tom Roper December 30th, 2006 02:34 PM

I just shot the 24F. Need a few minutes to capture and play it back.

Indoors on tripod
OIS off
F3.7
1/100th
-3db
Diffuse light from window
10 ft focal distance
zoomed from 30% to 95% at preset zoom speed 4

etc...

Now to review the result, standby...

Tom Roper December 30th, 2006 03:57 PM

Results in...
 
First observation...Wow...24F is gorgeous! The only other time I tried it was when I posted IMATEST MTF50 resolution results which showed the vertical resolution to have a drop of 10.6%. But I don't know how you can spot it in actual video. Beautiful!

Second Observation: I did (5) zooms from about 30% to 95%. The first zoom I did with the remote control, and it was faster than the zoom (4) setting on the rocker switch for some reason, too fast in fact. On the second and third zooms I used the rocker but realized OIS was on. There was no deleterious effect from OIS being on. Great! Only the 5th zoom was OIS off. Really no difference or harm having it switched on while on the tripod. Where it likely would pose the problem would be when panning. Anyway, I do mostly the run 'n gun shooting so OIS is always on for me.

Third Observation: I'm saying this as honestly as I can, but I think the autofocus while zooming in 24F from what I just saw is awesome. I viewed the playback footage on a 50 inch DLP from 7 ft. I wouldn't fathom returning this cam for such an alledged defect. Does that mean I saw no focus pulsing? No, because actually in about 3 of the zooms I can see some extremely minor pulsing during the zoom. It took 4-5 viewings before I spotted anything at all. In one case, I can see an extremely minor pulsing after the zooming stopped. In other cases after the zooming stops, it looks like a still photograph, perfectly motionless. In all instances, it was pixel peeping carried to the extreme. Does this mean that Alex, Michael and Philip are more sensitive or bothered by it? It's really hard to know because we are not looking at the same cam or the same conditions. I'm trying to rule out things that are already acknowledged to be autofocus exceptions like poor contrast or vertical patterns, so the cam has a fair chance to find its expected focus. The test scene presented no problem for the cam.

Fourth (a speculation): This is the one I can't discount. Alex's first cam. The picture of a black nylon bag laying on a wood deck in flat light, a very featureless scene. The focus was simply jumping up and down like hot oil on a frying pan. I've yet to remotely see anything that duplicates that ugly behavior. Now Alex has a replacement camera, and I thought he acknowledged it was substantially better. But is it a case where you are so traumatized by the recollection that you continue to see it everywhere? The cliche' is, if all you have is a hammer, then everything starts looking like a nail!

Fifth observation: In the test scene next to Santa's right ear, there is a gold ribbon that is 1/4 inch wide. Zoomed in from 10 feet, you can see incredible detail to the weave. I'm going to post a 100% crop of that detail at its sharpest and at its worst to illustrate the focus pulsing delta. It isn't much.

Michael Mann December 30th, 2006 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Roper
But if I felt as strongly about it as you do, I would return or sell the A1 and go back to the Z1.

No, Tom, you probably got me wrong. From the first moment I watched 25F clips of my new A1 on my computer display, I had no more intention at all ever to go back to the FX1. The overall image quality is so much better.

But I might return my A1 if there is a realistic chance that I get a "non-pulsing" unit in exchange, like Alex tried.

So, thanks for you testing, Tom. Could you upload one of your 24F demo clips?

Tom Roper December 30th, 2006 04:50 PM

Okay, I concede...
 
Being objective means remaining open minded about observations. It's a work in progress to remain unbiased, and the opinion has to be open to change as the data accumulates.

What I said in the previous post is how I feel about it viewing 24F on the 50 inch big screen in motion. Looks great.

But what's become obvious using the NLE to step through the frames is the image is going out of focus about every 3-5 frames during the zoom, exactly as has been noted. It's subtle, but undeniable.

The pulsing stops when the zooming stops.

Philip Williams December 30th, 2006 05:44 PM

Yes, sometimes its so subtle that its really not noticeable. As I stated earlier in this thread, I plan to just use manual focus in 24F mode from now on anyway, so its a moot point for me. But if I felt the need to use auto focus in 24F I'd certainly do so; the pulsing I've seen isn't a show stopper and I don't exactly record THAT many zooms anyway :)

As for the overall quality of 24F, yes its amazing. The detail is stunning, the motion is perfect and I have yet to break the codec in 24F mode (I've tried).

Tom Roper December 30th, 2006 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Mann
So, thanks for you testing, Tom. Could you upload one of your 24F demo clips?

Yes, I have an m2t clip to upload. It's 45mb and I'm on dialup so this could take awhile, be patient it's coming.

Brad Tyrrell December 30th, 2006 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Roper
Yes, I have an m2t clip to upload. It's 45mb and I'm on dialup so this could take awhile, be patient it's coming.

45 meg on dial-up? You are a brave and patient soul sir.

Tom Roper December 30th, 2006 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad Tyrrell
45 meg on dial-up? You are a brave and patient soul sir.

What? I'm 28% there! Only 2.5 hours to go!
Lol...

Tom Roper December 30th, 2006 09:52 PM

Here's the Link
 
Right Click, Save Target As...

http://vsdrives.com/movies/StNick.m2t

Alex Leith December 31st, 2006 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Roper
Wait...Alex, tell me how you want me to run the test, so I can best duplicate the conditions.

Sorry I didn't reply (I was asleep)! :-)

Thanks very much for running the test Tom. Yes, I agree with you that there is a tiny amount of pulsing in the clip - but it's barely visible... very comperable to the amount of interference I see on my camera.

I really appreciate the fact that people have been working together to discover one of the limitations of this camera. It's only by knowing what you can and can't do that you end up being more assured of coming home with usable footage when you're out in the field.

Personally, what I'm taking from this is that when in frame mode AF definately stays off, and I'll spot focus with the IAF button.

That matches how I work normally anyway, but it's good to know what I can and what I can't rely on.

Even with AF on I agree that the pulsing is probably going to be barely noticable in 99% of situations.

Once again, for me this "quirk" does not devalue the camera. The images are absolutely gorgeous and blow my FX1 out of the water!

Michael Mann December 31st, 2006 07:30 AM

Tom, thanks for sharing your clip. After watching it my impression is that "my" pulsing is stronger than yours. Anyway, I will not return my A1 since I don't consider it very likely now that the AF of the exchange unit will work any better. AF during zooms stays off from now on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Leith
I really appreciate the fact that people have been working together to discover one of the limitations of this camera. It's only by knowing what you can and can't do that you end up being more assured of coming home with usable footage when you're out in the field.

Yes, that's how I feel about it, too. I very much appreciate this kind of regardful constructive cooperation - the more when it's about possible malfunctions. (It's very easy - but not very rewarding - to praise benefits together. It's much more delicate when it's about limitations - but it pays off!) Thank you, Tom. Thank you, Alex.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Leith
Personally, what I'm taking from this is that when in frame mode AF definately stays off, and I'll spot focus with the IAF button.

I never used the IAF botton before - for me it was either AF or manual focus. But since I will stick with the A1 (and with 25F!), I want to learn to work that way (Manual focus plus IAF botton when changing focus plane). I' d love to sharing experience in working that way.

Tom Roper December 31st, 2006 10:19 AM

I totally agree with you both. I'm especially relieved you saw what you needed so as not to needlessly return the cam for service based on opinions alone. The video clip I think really helped there.

Jay Fisk December 31st, 2006 08:58 PM

Changing focus speed ?
 
If you just have to use IAF on a slow zoom, try changing the AF response speed from the Cam Controls menu. It makes any 'focus pulse' artifact less noticeable. Unfortunately it also retards the IAF push-button when in Manual Focus mode. I kind of like the slow focus mode but would like the IAF button to be fast during over-ride. Only two speeds here, fast or normal (slow...)

Full manual focus/exposure for zooms with any complexity seems to be best.

I just woke up from a strange dream where Microsoft had redesigned the menus on the A1 - it kept popping up confirmation and password screens everytime I changed a parameter. Too scary!

Tom Roper January 1st, 2007 12:13 PM

We're sorry, Canon A1 needs to close. Would you like to send a report to Microsoft?

But seriously, the focus speed preset might be an answer for the pulsing. I'm also wondering if servo vibrations while on the tripod have anything to do with it. I can't see any pulsing on handheld with OIS enabled.

Michael Mann January 1st, 2007 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Roper
... the focus speed preset might be an answer for the pulsing.

Yes, indeed. I never changed the default AF response speed to see if the pulsing might disapperar. But I will test this. Thanks for your proposal, Jay.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Roper
I can't see any pulsing on handheld with OIS enabled.

I do, Tom. All my "pulsing" slow zoom shots were handheld with OIM on. But I will test slow zooming with OIM switched off.

Tom Roper January 1st, 2007 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Mann
I do, Tom. All my "pulsing" slow zoom shots were handheld with OIM on. But I will test slow zooming with OIM switched off.

Okay then. I have to look closer for that.

Michael Mann January 2nd, 2007 08:51 AM

Cannot change manual focus while zooming!
 
Meanwhile I have done some slow zooms with AF switched off - no focus pulsing anymore. So far, so good. Then I turned my focus ring and ... nothing happend:

I cannot change my manual focus while zooming!

Please help! I must have overseen something, right?

Philip Williams January 2nd, 2007 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Mann
Meanwhile I have done some slow zooms with AF switched off - no focus pulsing anymore. So far, so good. Then I turned my focus ring and ... nothing happend:

I cannot change my manual focus while zooming!

Please help! I must have overseen something, right?

Nope, you can't focus and zoom at the same time. One motor for both functions I believe, so you can do one or the other.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:48 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network