DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Canon XL and GL Series DV Camcorders (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-xl-gl-series-dv-camcorders/)
-   -   4:1:1 vs 4:2:0 (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-xl-gl-series-dv-camcorders/42802-4-1-1-vs-4-2-0-a.html)

Dennis Davidoff April 11th, 2005 02:14 PM

4:1:1 vs 4:2:0
Recently I came across a curious info regarding different compressions in XL2. It seems that XL2 NTSC uses 4:1:1 compression, while PAL version uses 4:2:0.

So, what does that mean for the visible picture quality and how different is it, really? Which is "better"?


Joshua Provost April 11th, 2005 02:47 PM


Both formats are storing the same amount of color data (1/4 the luma data). However, the store it in differents shapes, if you will. 4:1:1 in long, rectangular blocks, 1x4 pixels. 4:2:0 on square blocks, 2x2 pixels. The same amount of data, in a different configuration.

I don't think that one is necessarily better than the other. However, you must realize that they will result in different types of artifacts. Banding artifacts versus block artifacts.

Now, I have a theory about 4:1:1 being a better format for interlaced video, because for any motion where there will be interlace combing, 4:1:1 is accurate (as it can be) for each line. 4:2:0 encoding of interlace coding could end up being highly inaccurate.

For progressive video, 4:2:0 is likely better, as it distributes it's artifacts equally horizontally and vertically.

With that in mind, XL2 PAL 25p would seem to be a great format for eventual film transfer.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:46 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2021 The Digital Video Information Network