DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Canon XL and GL Series DV Camcorders (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-xl-gl-series-dv-camcorders/)
-   -   XL2 and EF Lens Adapter / EF Lenses / EOS Lens (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-xl-gl-series-dv-camcorders/67044-xl2-ef-lens-adapter-ef-lenses-eos-lens.html)

Tom Duncan September 29th, 2004 06:47 PM

see my new thread in the XL1S watchdog section with comparisons of lenses with the EF adapter.

http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...threadid=32734

Darren Kelly September 30th, 2004 09:49 AM

I received my XL adapter a day or two ago and decided to try it with a tamron 200-500mm lens I have.

What was impressive was the amount of the zoom I could use. If you want to improve your chances of getting some great wildlife stuff, eagles, birds, etc, I would recommend this to you. The tripod should be solid and I don't think you could even consider this a handheld option, but I was impressed with the sharpness and quality.

BTW, I'm using an XL2

DBK

Lauri Kettunen October 4th, 2004 12:20 AM

XL2 and EF lenses
 
There is now a footage at www.luontovideo.net/XL2-lens-test.html demonstrating the image one gets with the XL2 PAL in 25p mode using the XL-EF adapter and various EF-lenses. The lenses I used were:

XL 3x 3.4-10.2mm and
XL 20x 5.4-108mm lenses
EF 17-35mm F/2.8L USM,
EF 70-200mm F/2.8L USM,
EF 100-400mm F/4.5-5.6L IS USM,
EF 400mm F/2.8L USM.

The file is rather big, 207Mb, and an avi file employing the Microsoft codec. (The clips were imported to Premiere through a standard firewire port.) Some fog appeared, when I attached the EF 400mm lens, and it shows.

Some comments:

The EF 100-400mm lens was very difficult to focus in the 400mm end. I do not find personally that lens useful. Neither the EF 70-200mm was easy to focus.

Some first impressions of the XL2 compared to the XL1:

Improvements: Audio, nex 20x lens, sharpness, colors, knee & black adjustments, custom functions, optical image stabilator

Improvements but could be further developed: display (can't see any flickering), audio inputs (balanced line input missing, but can live with that)

Not happy about: The iris/set knob (would have preferred the dial of XL1 but can live with the new knob) and with the mechanical design of the plastic covers of the inputs; My concern is that the small rubber rod between the cover and the camera body will break in parts at some point next winter.

Lasse Bodoni October 4th, 2004 12:45 PM

yes, it is a nice color-show. Can't play the video, only some color blocks. Do we need a codec?

Mark Grgurev October 4th, 2004 01:04 PM

Yea, you have to recompress it. someone can get a seizure from that file.

Rabi Syid October 4th, 2004 01:07 PM

how do we recompress the file?

Lauri Kettunen October 4th, 2004 01:20 PM

Hmm, somebody seems always to have some problems. Guess one needs Premiere or some other software to view the clip. I'll create another version of the clip as soon as have a chance for that. Sorry for the inconvinience, "please do not shoot the pianist."

Rob Lohman October 4th, 2004 01:50 PM

This has nothing to do with compression or re-compression. It is
a DV file and something went wrong. It is indeed faulty. I suspect
something went wrong when you uploaded it (perhaps your FTP
program was set to text while uploading instead of binary mode).

Lasse Bodoni October 4th, 2004 02:13 PM

it isn't a software issue but a codec or encoding

Lauri Kettunen October 4th, 2004 02:27 PM

Rob, thanks, you guessed the source of problem. It was in ftp and the default ascii mode it assumed.

I just deleted the old avi file and a new one will be available in couple hours.

Please wait till 11:30 pm London time before trying to download the new file.

(I'm filming at the altitude of the artic circle and it takes some time to ftp the file again to the server for I have only a slow connection available.)

Gabriele Turchi October 4th, 2004 03:17 PM

Really Thanks Lauri !!

You are very very Kind

Best reagards


Gabriele

Rob Lohman October 5th, 2004 01:45 AM

The file is okay now indeed. Glad I could help in solving the
problem. Thank you Lauri for putting the footage up!

Lauri Kettunen October 5th, 2004 12:04 PM

I made another sample demonstrating XL2 together with EF 400mm/f2.8 L USM lens. The sample requires canopus codec and is available at

www.luontovideo.net/XL2-lens-test.html

There are two clips in the sample. The other object was taken 100 meters away and the other 6 meters away from the camcorder. Be aware, that since the magnification with a 400mm lense is huge, when the object is far away, humidity and the motion of air easily blur the image. This sample was taken in rather good conditions in this respect.

Tony Hall November 2nd, 2004 12:50 AM

EF adapter w/ Sigma 12-24mm lens?
 
Has anyone used the Sigma 12-24mm lens with the EF adapter? I'm concerned about being able to change the aperture electronically because there's no aperture ring on the lens. Also, is it true that the EF adapter doesn't autofocus with 35mm lenses?

Duncan Wilson November 2nd, 2004 03:02 AM

Tony

I haven't used this specific lens, but I have used other Sigmas with the EF adapter. You change the aperture using the camera's iris wheel (or whatever you call it on the XL2) in exactly the same way as you do with the stock XL lenses.

Yes, it is true that you lose any autofocus function on a 35mm lens when using the EF adapter.

Regards
Duncan


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:13 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network