Quote:
Losses? IMHO, no. Maybe the fact that it's going from HDV to DVCPRO HD, but you can get XLH1 footage into lots of other formats (like uncompressed) in order to keep recompression at bay. Maybe one of the codec experts can help me out here, but I think because the HDV is subsampled down to smaller frame 720p, you get 4-2-2 color anyway, and that's to say nothing of acquiring through live SDI tap. That program does a flawless job of converting to 720p if you use the right settings. Maybe the only loss is simply that you're losing resolution the H1 provides by going down to 720p, but 720p is a very good HD format and it's nice to know that the H1 can look terrific in this realm too. Oh yeah...the main loss: time. The renders can be dog slow, but that may be a small price to pay for all the flexibilty. |
Good report. Thanks again.
|
Quote:
Is it possible to handle with that resolution in order to get slow down from 60i/50i to 24p without left 1080? And in this case to have more resolution than 720p mode with the HVX200? Without speaking, of course, of the higher XL-H1 1440x1080 CCDs vs the lower HVX200 960x540 CCDs -- pixel shifted or not. |
useful observation
Leuname Ereh wrote
<<<Major differences at my point of view, codecs away: HVX200 color + filmic dynamic range + wide latitude + native progressive scan = better film-like look XL-H1 native higher resolution + superior lowlight & noise handling = better run and gun >>> Leuname, thank you for a really practical insight. I need more of them whenever you feel inspired by your experiences. |
Quote:
Regardless, it can look pretty good and reasonably slow for dramatic purposes. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:01 PM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network