Daniel Browning |
October 27th, 2009 12:44 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynne Whelden
(Post 1438219)
Can someone tell me if the 1 D is the "ideal" camera at the present time? Or to put it another way, what are its drawbacks?
|
The most important drawback, IMHO, is that it does not (presently) run Magic Lantern.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynne Whelden
(Post 1438219)
But the fact that this camera operates under most lighting conditions is very attractive to me.
|
I'm hopeful that the low light performance is improved as well, but I haven't seen any raw images from it yet, so I don't know yet. The 5D2 starts with a big size advantage (1.7X more light gathering area), which gives it a 2/3 stop advantage in low light. Hopefully the 1D4 technology is a full stop improvement, enough to take the low light crown from the 5D2.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynne Whelden
(Post 1438219)
Plus it is lightweight. And its DOF of course, along with lens selection. What's there not to like?
|
The DOF control is nice, more than the 7D but not as much as the 5D2. If you never shoot wide angle, the lens selection is good. But if you want wides and ultrawides, the options are worse than the 7D and 5D2. Canon makes lenses for spoons (1.6X) and they make lenses for forks (FF), but they don't make any for sporks (1.3X). For example, to get the same angle of view as the 10-22, Canon would have to make a 13-29mm.
|