Re: Roger Ebert: Why I Hate 3-D (And You Should Too)
 

I am the wrinkly generational exception. I do like the 3D experience "IF" it is done well. Being the fussy wretch I am, I take the time to find the row of seats in the cinema with the natural human field-of-view relationship with the screen. I then shift about until I get the audio balance good and mark that as my own personal spot and get there early enough to claim it.

In this spot, the Avatar 3D was fine for me. If there was a poisoned dog which should go all loopy with 3D imaging, it has to be me. I am short-sighted, have age-related visual deterioration, slightly red-green colourblindness, am wrong eye dominant and am about 15db down in the right ear.

Re: Roger Ebert: Why I Hate 3-D (And You Should Too)
 

Here's a nice article about 3D by Alexis van Hurkman, colorist:

I Don’t Hate Stereoscopic Films | Alexis Van Hurkman ? Thinking Aloud

Re: Roger Ebert: Why I Hate 3-D (And You Should Too)
 

Re: Roger Ebert: Why I Hate 3-D (And You Should Too)
 

That's too bad. I watched an Ultimate Fighting Championships (UFC) event in a theater in 3D. Other than the "over-3D" titling, 3D was overall gentle and enhanced the experience despite the need for glasses.