apple pro res vs. apple pro res (HQ)
Whats the difference and how much of a difference is there. Is it worth using (HQ).
|
Quote:
-C |
I've been wondering this myself. I looked up the whitepaper, but what I am wondering is if I have HDV footage does the ProRes (HQ) do any good -as opposed to regular ProRes? Is the (HQ) only for the true HD stuff, or would it even make my HDV better looking or easier to chroma key?
|
I find it very difficult to tell the difference between the quality of the two codecs. I normally use ProRes for most stuff to save on disc space. But if I'm rendering graphics, then I use ProRes HQ.
|
I could be wrong but:
Pro-Res 422 HQ is equivalent to Avid's DNxHD 220 (mbs). Pro-Res 422 is equivalent to Avid's DNxHD 175 (mbs). So, again, data rate is major difference. -C |
I edit in HDV 1080i 50i but then master in pro res at 1080i 25p, I havent found the HQ to be any better quality when coming from HDV but the use of pro res as a master file seems to be a good workflow as it then transcodes for web and DVD use a lot better.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:35 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network