DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Final Cut Suite (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/final-cut-suite/)
-   -   excessive encoding time? (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/final-cut-suite/94677-excessive-encoding-time.html)

Dave Lammey May 30th, 2007 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drew Curran (Post 688186)
I also use this method, as I found HDV to slow expecially for long clips. I also found that I had a greatly reduced number of realtime effects when using HDV on the timeline. I have a G5 dual 2.0 with 4gb ram. AIC is just faster.

Drew


Thanks for all the replies. Drew, do you mean that you capture as AIC? Or you capture as HDV and then convert to AIC? If the latter, how is that done? Thanks.

Greg Penetrante May 30th, 2007 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lammey (Post 688854)
Thanks for all the replies. Drew, do you mean that you capture as AIC? Or you capture as HDV and then convert to AIC? If the latter, how is that done? Thanks.

Hi, Dave,

I capture to HDV and then use Batch Export feature to convert all clips to DVCProHD (720p). On a quad G5 it takes roughly 2:1 realtime (2 min/1 min).
If my sequence uses lots of overlays and intricate, detailed graphics I batch export to AIC instead.

Dave Lammey May 30th, 2007 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg Penetrante (Post 688886)
Hi, Dave,

I capture to HDV and then use Batch Export feature to convert all clips to DVCProHD (720p). On a quad G5 it takes roughly 2:1 realtime (2 min/1 min).
If my sequence uses lots of overlays and intricate, detailed graphics I batch export to AIC instead.

Ah, thanks. So here's the dumb question: why convert to DVCProHD? Are you working with 1080i footage originally (from a Sony FX1, for example), and if so, is there any problem converting to 720p?

Greg Penetrante May 30th, 2007 07:12 AM

Turbo 264 fun
 
Just bought an Elgato Turbo264 USB stick...

DVCPro 720p/24 to...
iPod Standard (640x480): 17 FPS (!)
iPod Regular (320x240): 60 FPS (!!)
AppleTV (800x480): 17 FPS (!)

Those encode time clearly beat Compressor. The files are also 5-10% smaller. Quality is the same as Compressor multipass.

So far, so good!

Greg Penetrante May 31st, 2007 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lammey (Post 688887)
Ah, thanks. So here's the dumb question: why convert to DVCProHD? Are you working with 1080i footage originally (from a Sony FX1, for example), and if so, is there any problem converting to 720p?

Dave,

I find that DVCProHD is better to work with because 1) Each frame is individual; 2) FCP runs faster with DVCProHD workflow.

I find that converting interlaced to progressive sacrifices a bit in image quality. That said, if you want to go to 720p then the better compromise is 720p60 from 1080i60.

best regards


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:45 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network