Duane Harper Grant |
June 9th, 2006 10:39 PM |
Yes this is correct
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Hodson
There seems to be some miscomunication here guys. Duane keeps referring to the DVX200, which I thought of as typo of HVX200, and it appears DSE is thinking the same thing, but then Duane mentions loosing 16:9 which makes me think he is really talking about the DVX100. Duane do you want to clarify?
|
Thanks for pointing this out Ken. I did indeed mean the panny dvx100 a/b. Was reading the reviews. A lot of "video film makers" for lack of a better way to put the term, are using this camera given that it has no true (native) 16:9. This is an interesting point for me. I'm curious to know what they are doing and is 4:3 their desired format or using anamorphic lense? Interesting.
Thanks for the focus and LCD tips and info Boyd. This is good to know. Focusing manually in HD, one must have some recourse to make sure.
Great Amanda! thanks for the heads up. Let us know how the shooting goes. I will do the same. The fx1 is what I'm leaning towards but my mind's not completely made up. Amazing that B and H have this back in. I spoke to them this past Wednesday and they had a 2-4 week wait going. EVS was out as were some of the other on-line retailers. i had even placed an order for one at another place but found out subsequently that they were out. Went back to research about the dvx100. Anyway, cheers on your find and best of luck on your project.
|