Harm Millaard |
June 10th, 2007 03:50 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Bosco Jr.
(Post 694765)
I guess it's possible, but it would have to be a fast system to record uncompressed hd. Plus, storage would be severely hindered. I don't know if it would be practicle if it only could record an half hour or so of footage. Maybe the future will bring a Focus-like terabyte drive that accepts HDMI. Of course, I think they would develop something like the Focus system that records HD-SDI before HDMI. That would be something, though. I wonder what the cost would be?
|
I guess like you, John that it is possible, but highly impractical. You would require a sustained write transfer rate of around 200 MB/s, which means with current disk speeds at least a 4 or 5 disk Raid0 array of 3.5 inch 7200 RPM SATA2 disks. 2.5 inch or smaller form factors are way too slow. So volume, cooling and weight will be a major practical problem, apart from the power supply needed to run a 4 disk array. Then add to the equation that even when using 250 GB disks, so you have effectively 1TB in the array, it will only suffice for around 90 minutes to fill up all the space. So, when shooting outdoors, you have to bring at least 2 or more of these arrays for the day.
Further take into consideration the limited length of HDMI cables and the flimsy connection and you are almost required to mount it on camera. That will add at least 10 pounds in weight to the camera, including the power supply.
Last point is price. If you look at the price of the current FS-100, with storage capacity of 100 GB, at $ 1.895, can you imagine what a 1 TB array with embedded raid controller and portable power supply with loader must cost. My guess is it would be at or above the Wafian range, so at least $ 17K.
Look here: http://www.wafian.com/HR-F1.htm
BTW, can you imagine mounting a disk array like that on your A1/V1/Z1 hand held camera?
|