DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Jibs / Cranes / Booms (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/jibs-cranes-booms/)
-   -   Jib designed for DV systems 15 lbs & below (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/jibs-cranes-booms/3055-jib-designed-dv-systems-15-lbs-below.html)

James Emory August 6th, 2002 11:55 PM

Jib designed for DV systems 15 lbs & below
 
Jimmy Jib, the makers of the Triangle, offers this very affordable full scale jib with remote head, the Jib Lite. It is the scaled down version of the full sized Triangle model. It is really 3 jibs in one, 6', 12' or 18' with a lens height of 25 ft. It uses the same electronics, controls, and head motors as the higher end model. It costs about as much as two XL-1ss and is worth every penny for the shots it can deliver.

This can be viewed at http://www.jimmyjib.com

Jib Lite at work on location:

http://community.webtv.net/JEFProductions/JIBCONFIGURATIONS

Chris Hurd August 7th, 2002 05:28 AM

For a much more affordable solution which is every bit as effective, consider the $750 SkyCrane at www.skycrane.com -- web video clips on dvinfo.net soon.

James Emory August 7th, 2002 11:28 PM

Jib comparison
 
I definitely have to agree that the Skycrane is MUCH more affordable rig than the Jib Lite. However, I have to strongly disagree with it being everybit as effective. From what I could see from the site, the head cannot pan. Now, what good is a jib if your camera is 12'- 20' away and you can't pan the camera? Booming left or right is not the same motion. The operator cannot correct as the arc swing is performed. The Skycrane is just fine for vertical moves, but your shots are really limited to just that with a fixed head jib. You won't find that kind of a jib at a concert or any other event or production with a crowd or audience. It just doesn't have the versatility for the "money shots" that these producers want. The main reason that I posted info about it was that it was specifically designed for DV type camera systems and retains much of the same characteristics of the it's big brother flying the betacams, Panavisions and Arri's. Now Varizoom has introduced a remote head that costs as much as an XL-1s. This could be attached to a fixed head jib like the Skycrane and there you go. But is it safe and has it been load tested. I am weary about mixing and matching things like that especially something that's flying over a crowd's head. My point is that this turnkey system is time tested, safe and gets those money shots that the clients want without any add ons or modifications. Believe me, I didn't like spending that kind of money for it but it has payed for itself a few times over so far. It's not too expensive the quality that you're getting. Also, clients that didn't even know what a jib was, ones that had to be talked in to using it, demand it for future projects now that they see what it can do. They are two very different systems as far as function and versatility.

Chris Hurd August 8th, 2002 06:42 AM

James

The VariZoom MC100 Pan/Tilt works perfectly with SkyCrane and is load-tested and completely safe. SkyCrane is modifying its own head to include pan capability. Nothing wrong with the Jimmy Jib, but it's overkill for DV. You pointed out yourself that the system is multiple times more expensive than the camera.

SkyCrane is a long-time DV Info Net sponsor and supporter. Whenever camera cranes are mentioned, I'll always present the SkyCrane as an affordable, effective, safe and appropriate jib solution for DV use. Hope this helps,

James Emory August 8th, 2002 09:29 PM

"I'll always present the SkyCrane as an affordable, effective, safe and appropriate jib solution for DV use." Ok. No doubt, it is affordable, effective, safe and appropriate...............but it ain't as versatile.

Next topic. Old Tom has been hard at it I see. Seriously, can that MC-100 be underslung? I'm asking because he doesn't show it on the site in that orientation. I would need that to do a 90 degree overhead spin. I don't see why it couldn't be underslung according to the pictures. Holler at me.

Thomas McKay August 9th, 2002 11:59 PM

MC100 Underslung
 
James,

The MC-100 can be underslung without any trouble. It has a reverse control system, built in, to allow same fee control rightside up or underslung.

I double checked the MC-100 page and it is shown underslung in the very bottom left corner. It is not easy to find and we will fix that soon.

http://www.varizoom.com/pages/mc100.htm

Thanks for mentioning it.

Tom

John Locke October 31st, 2002 07:10 PM

FYI - SkyCrane will tentatively announce their new "SkyPan" in mid-December which will be sold as an accessory to their cranes (or other model cranes). The estimated price will be around $550.

Ken Tanaka October 31st, 2002 07:41 PM

Steven Wills is a new member of our community (http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...&threadid=4648) and he seems to be quite an expert on jibs. (http://home.insightbb.com/~steventv/) Maybe he'll chime in on this thread.

John Locke October 31st, 2002 09:17 PM

I'll tell you where I'd like some input...variations between SkyCrane models. I went through and read the specs on each model, saw the comparison tables...but still don't have a clue about what the advantages and/or disadvantages are of each.

For instance, the "Shottaker" and the "Premiere"...besides two extra feet and two less pounds for the Premiere, what's the advantage of one over the other? Are there any particular types of shooting that certain models are better at handling?

Chris Hurd October 31st, 2002 09:43 PM

I believe the difference primarily is in length. Will try to fetch Bob Jones in here and let him tell it to you straight "from the manufacturer."

John Locke October 31st, 2002 09:51 PM

Thanks, Chris. That'd be great. (I got the info on the upcoming SkyPan from him just today by e-mail...get the idea I'm shopping for a crane?)

Steven Wills November 1st, 2002 03:21 PM

Yeow....it seems the old story of which is better (Mac vs. IBM....Ford Vs. Chevy, etc...etc) can be talked to death. BUT...Both have advantages over the other is some areas. Now don't get me wrong, but since I was asked for my input on this, I'll tell you how "I" feel and what I have learned.

First off....it doesn't make sense to "me" to take a $750.00 "jib" and put a $4000.00 piece of controlling equipment on it. It would be really hard to justify it's expense and you would be "limited" in the amount of work you could do to get a "return" on your investment.

How many times have you seen a "skycrane" used at a ESPN, Fox, NBC or CBS event? So far in my career, I haven't. For the "most part", you will find Cammates and Jimmy Jibs being used. Most are around 20' or more and even then, they want longer if you have it. They (the networks) have come to know these products from exposure and dependability in the field. They like the fact that they can get the shots they want without having to wonder about the ability of the gear and the dependability of it.

You need to understand this, we work under great time and money constraints and the producers want a "fit" on every shoot. That means, they want something that is tried and true...used all the time and there is NO doubt it works and it will interface with the truck. So don't be bringing some "weird" piece of gear on a show and drop it on the truck engineer's lap and say it does "so and so" really well. They don't "know" the gear and they ain't gonna like it AT ALL! And if something does go wrong...you better believe they will have a part "red tagged" from a "known" vendor there really quick. They may not even know where or if they can get a part from "Bob's Jib service".

Second, I understand not everyone works in broadcasting and needs the expense and hassle of owing a full sized Jib. It is a TREMENDOUS amount of money (to me) to spend in the hopes you will make a living with it. It is a very specialized piece of gear and sometimes you'll find yourself with it sitting in the garage and the payments still come in and must be paid regardless of your qualifications or experience. Owing a Jib is great...but now you must "feed it". You have the overhead of advertising and promoting it. Just getting the word out takes all my time anymore.

This is where something like the "Skycrane" comes in...it's low in overhead and will do smaller work for DV just fine. It easily transported and does just what it's advertised to do. But don't think your going to get a "foothold" in broadcasting with it. You can get great shots with it I'm sure but if you think your going to freelance with ESPN with it your not being realistic. It seems Skycrane has made a great little product prefect for you guys that need tabletop shots and smaller studio productions. It seems well made and reliable to me.

I would say more but I have a music video to go shoot and I'm running late...yeah...they wanted the twenty footer.

Ken Tanaka November 1st, 2002 04:17 PM

Thanks very much for joining-in, Steven.

My general impression of the topic is that it's identical to that of SteadiCam-type intertial stabilization. That is, it's a two-fold consideration. First, you generally get what you pay for with regard to equipment reliability and capabilities. Yes, there may be a short-cut or two possible for a range of applications. And certainly the prices of specialty "professional" gear becomes naturally inflated over time. But, in general, there's what "really works" and what "kinda works".

Secondly, as with inertial stabilization, getting the equipment does not automatically make the owner a jib-meister. It takes practice, practice, practice. First and foremost I would imagine that you have to have enough skill to frame shots properly on the ground.

I doubt that we have many folks here who would actually expect to try to earn their living from such a specialty. But, as with remarks by Charles Papert concerning SteadiCam matters, it is interesting to see the general view of someone who relies so heavily on this equipment.

James Emory November 1st, 2002 06:40 PM

Mmmmm!
 
Boy, I sure stirred up a ruckus!

Chris Hurd November 1st, 2002 06:53 PM

Steve Wills is of course quite correct. I have a close relationship with Bob Jones of SkyCrane; whenever I stay in the L.A. area he and his wife usually put me up for the night. That said, although I'm a huge SkyCrane fan, it should be clearly understood that it is designed specifically for prosumer 3-chip DV camcorders (Bob had the XL1 in mind when he invented it).

SkyCrane will support a full-size camera; however as James Emory points out it is not intended as a competitive replacement for a Jimmy Jib; nowhere in that league even. Of course you wouldn't see a SkyCrane on a high-end broadcast shoot -- not yet that I'm aware of, anyway. But is in use by MIT and other universities, it has been used for shooting space shuttle launches with HD cameras, independent low-budget moviemaking and a variety of other applications.

SkyCrane is an affordable alternative to the ProMax Cobra Crane. It's a prosumer jib for prosumer camcorders. You can definitely use it for event work, for whatever you'd shoot with an XL1; but as Ken points out, all camera cranes require some intense practice before you'll pull off a decent move.

Again to echo Ken, you get what you pay for in this business. If you need a crane and you can afford a Jimmy Jib, then that's definitely the way you should go. On a budget? The $750 SkyCrane delivers excellent bang for buck.

And it will support the VariZoom pan & tilt head. At trade shows, EZ FX (another fine crane company) shows the VariZoom unit on a $1200 crane, and I've seen Jimmy Jib demo an $8,000 crane with a $4,000 XL1 on it, so yes the price disparities in this business are surprising sometimes!

John Locke November 1st, 2002 08:46 PM

SkyCrane themselves reinforce what Chris is saying in their "What Others Say" link. One of the reviews has this line
Quote:

I think any college video team or company on a tight budget would find the Skycrane a great enhancement to their productions.
And that's me..."on a tight budget." Let's face it...all beginners like me aspire to making it to the "big time." But unless you crank out some work that "mimics" the quality of big productions, you'll have a heck of a time ever getting noticed enough to get there. So, products like SkyCrane are a godsend in that respect. Maybe you won't see them being used in big productions...but then again, just about any tool can be useful in certain situations.

So, if it were a matter of having only Jimmy Jib as an alternative...you could expect NOT to see any crane shots in any of my projects. No way could I afford that.

Robert Jones November 1st, 2002 10:57 PM

SkyCrane Models
 
Hey, this is the first time I have ever joined a discussion group.

Steven is correct, you probably have never seen the SkyCrane used on CBS, NBC or ABC.

As Chris stated the SkyCrane was developed for the lighter weight mini DV cams and not for the heavier ENG cameras. However, the SkyCrane has been used in numerous ways, including national television affiliates, independent film makers, National Geographic special, surgical suites and the list goes on.

To answer John's question, all of the SkyCrane models are identical in their movement(function). The main differences between the SkyCrane models, with budgets in mind, is the construction materials (aluminum vs powder coated steel). The varying lengths and the optional accessories (such as cable trussing, the new "Friction Drags" and soon to come the SkyPan) allow for configurations specific to the production needs.

If anyone has any further questions regarding the SkyCrane, I would be delighted to answer.

Steven Wills November 2nd, 2002 11:38 AM

This is my first time being in a discussion group too Bob and I'm really glad I was directed to it by Tom Smith of Varizoom. (thanks Tom)

As far as "tighter budgets" for productions go...you guys really have a opportunity to showcase your skills by using a piece of gear like the Skycrane. For a "relatively" small amount of money you can possess the gear to make the difference between a "nice shot" and a "great shot". No doubt, it can make a difference in your productions. I can truly attest to the power of the Jib and how it has affected my productions. The point is, if you can afford it and use it when it's called for, you can set your productions apart from all the others.

Something like the Skycrane is nothing more than another tool in your "bag of tricks" just like a star filter or a creative wipe. Part of being a good videographer or director is knowing when to use the right tools at the right time. I don't care if you use a camera on a "stick"...so long as the shot calls for it and you use it in the correct way.

I encourage all shooters to acquire the right tools needed and learn to look for different and unique ways of applying them in different situations. Part of the reason you are in this business is because you ARE creative. This also goes "up the line" to people like Robert Jones who decided something was needed like the Skycrane for people like himself and KNEW that people like you could benefit from a product like the Skycrane, at a price point that would make it affordable. I can't "endorse" his product because I have never used it, but it seems he has put a lot of thought and engineering skill into making his product. (Bob, if you would like for me to review one, I would be happy to))

This goes back to one of my original points. Dealing with a "known" vendor. In "my" world...it's a Stanton and Varizoom products. I can't show up with some "weird" jib or other piece of gear and expect them to hire me. Here, (in the smaller jib arena) you need to look for a product that's well built, flexible and has the right price point for your productions. Look for a vendor that keeps you informed of his changes and new product announcements. Remember....your not just buying a piece of equipment...your buying part of a company. You want someone who will "partner" with you in your discoveries and productions. Someone that is receptive in your needs and future needs. Someone who is dedicated to making your productions the best they can be. Thats why I always suggest you buy direct and not from a "middle man".

Wanna know a "secret"? Sometimes..."just" sometimes...I loose a job because my Jib is too big! It's not easily transported and it takes too long to set up and it's heavy. I have to have power and
then there's the "liability issues...swinging a few hundred pounds of steel over a large crowd at 25 feet in the air above them (if it goes wrong...and it CAN) will not only wipe out your career and checkbook...but might put you in jail too. So don't go thinking it's all "gravy" on my end. For tabletop commercials, smaller studio work and shoots where you need portability, light weight and have no power, this might just be the ticket you needed...I've often thought something like this might be just the thing "I" could use too.

Chris Hurd November 2nd, 2002 12:05 PM

Howdy from Texas,

<< This goes back to one of my original points. Dealing with a "known" vendor. In "my" world...it's a Stanton and Varizoom products. Remember....your not just buying a piece of equipment...your buying part of a company. You want someone who will "partner" with you in your discoveries and productions. >>

Steve, you've done a terrific job of putting this into words. What you've described is the reasoning behind our sponsorship model here at dvinfo.net -- it's exactly why we're partnered with great companies like VariZoom and SkyCrane, and camera dealers such as Zotz, ZGC and Pro-Tape, because those are the folks that care and who will look after you long after the sale. And their prices are realistic, and competitive with all except the low-ball "rip off" artists out there. Thanks for making such a great statement about the right way to purchase gear for the best value -- I certainly appreciate it!

Jean King February 7th, 2003 12:47 PM

Types of cranes
 
Hello!
I am totally confused on the different types of cranes!
What is the difference between a cable and pulley style crane, and the metal parallelogram pushrod "Megacrane" system?? I am looking for one currently, that is especially easy to use. I have not used a jib crane before, and I am looking to use it for an upcoming March shoot.

Jean King

Charles Papert February 8th, 2003 02:39 AM

Ken:

You are, as usual, correct in comparing remote arms to Steadicam in terms of the price and workmanship differential between low end and high end. I have a few colleagues who own both Jimmy Jibs and Steadicams and there is a lot of crossover. I myself considered a Jimmy Jib years ago as a purchase but I couldn't deal with shlepping around that much gear...! I do own a pretty high end remote head with motion control capabilities, and the production ends up renting the arm (usually a 23 ft. Fisher), which saves me the shlep.

Naturally, the bottom line with all this stuff is the almighty dollar, and virtually all readers of this forum would consider paying more than the cost of the camera for any kind of support device ludicrous. My philosophy with low-end gear is that the dividing line between acceptable and not worth it is whether it can deliver satisfactory results if the operating skill is high. For instance, a fluid head is" acceptable" if it can pan and tilt smoothly, even if that requires some attention and specific technique from the operator to overcome minor stickiness. In a perfect world, none is required, but that will probably cost more than the camera (in that same perfect world, that $3500 camera will have 16:9 chips, pressure-sensitive zoom, 24p, etc. etc.) A not-acceptable head creates jerky moves regardless of how experienced the operator is. It all comes down to the end result on screen.

By the same token, if a given crane can produce smooth, vibration-free shots with delicate and responsive control, then it is doing its job. Given the most demanding type of operating, such as swinging the arm from 9 o'clock to 3 o'clock while keeping the camera pointing at 12 o'clock the whole time (i.e. backpanning), I'm sure some of the lower end cranes will not measure up. But for simple boom ups/tilt downs, maybe they will suffice. It really depends on how particular one is.

I will say this: I'm a big fan of really good Jimmy Jib operators. Watching someone operate a complicate move which involves a big arm swing combined with zooming and focusing, all as a one-man band, that's some good stuff. I can certainly respect that because in the film world, those same tasks are split between at least four souls (one grip on each end of the arm, plus an operator and camera assistant). Just panning and tilting through such a move requires so much of my attention, the mind boggles at adding all those other tasks...

Steven Wills February 9th, 2003 08:16 AM

Re: Types of cranes
 
<<<-- Originally posted by Jean King : Hello!
I am totally confused on the different types of cranes!
What is the difference between a cable and pulley style crane, and the metal parallelogram pushrod "Megacrane" system?? I am looking for one currently, that is especially easy to use. I have not used a jib crane before, and I am looking to use it for an upcoming March shoot.

Jean King -->>>

Jean, if you would tell us more about what type of use (shots, locations & restrictions) you need in a crane or jib, I would be happy to go into more detail and try to answer you questions.

You have many options and products to choose from. Having not used one before may or may not be a problem depending on what it is you plan on doing with the gear you need. Price is always a consideration and you didn't seem to indicate anything about that. What is you budget for this equipment? Also, what type and weight of camera do you plan on using? If you would give me more detail I'm sure this forum will answer all your questions.

Here (in this forum) we have some people that even manufacture them and are always glad to assist you in your decisions. Bob Jones is a prefect example. He knows his gear and is always available to answer questions about his products. Chris Hurd is also another one that has seen this question pass through this forum and may have a large knowledge to assist you.

If you find your leaning towards a "larger" type of "jib", I may be able to assist you in that arena.

Glad you came on board and we welcome your questions and hope to assist you in any way we can.

Jean King February 9th, 2003 02:21 PM

MegaCranes
 
I anticipate doing mostly indoor shoots, with varing light conditions. I will have a second camera on a standard tripod and a Canon GL2 on the jib arm. My question about the megacrane was brought up, because from the looks of pictures, it looks as though it would be rather easy to use, as opposed to the cable and pulley style. Weight of the actual jib is not a concern, as we will setup once, and not have to move the jib until the shoot is over. In a ballroom the size of the Sheraton hotel, I don't forsee space being a limitation in terms of operation of the jib.

Jean King

Wayne Orr February 9th, 2003 02:49 PM

Maybe I'm just out of it, Jean, but you are going to spend maybe well over a thousand dollars on something you have never used and expect to get high quality shots right out of the box? Or even with limited practice? What if the thing doesn't do what you want? Do you know that jib does not have the ability to pan the camera independent of the arm?

Since you appear to live in Atlanta, why not investigate renting a real jib with an experienced operator? You will get someone who knows what they are doing, with gear that actually works. And if you don't like what he is doing, you can get someone else. If you don't like the way the Megacrane works, tough. You're still out the thousand dollars plus.

Check around Atlanta, and I bet you can find someone who will help you out if you are on a limited budget. There is a lot of production in your city.

Just another thought.

James Emory February 10th, 2003 01:28 AM

Jib Configurations
 
I totally agree with you Wayne. You don't want to be trying to learn how your system works on your first project with it. You really need to know how it works mechanically for troubleshooting and most importantly safety. It takes quite a bit of practice to learn the feel of this type of gear. I would recommend renting the first time as well and not having an expensive, heavy paper weight sitting there if it doesn't work out. The difference in the tie rod system and the pulley leveling system is just that. Tie rod systems are going to be more rigid and allow for heavier camera systems like film cameras and video cameras with prompters. Tie rod systems are also going to be heavier because of the extra metal in their composition. I bet that tie rod systems carried over from the cranes that also have seats for the operator and assistant. Pulley leveled systems can now carry larger camera systems using heavy duty cables that can be coiled and easily stored and weigh much less. I've never used a tie rod system and can't imagine NOT using a pulley system. It's as easy as connecting each end with a pin and you're done! Next, there are a few small balancing adjustments and leveling fine tuning. I am in the ATL with the jib he needs, holler at me Jean!

Steven Wills May 10th, 2004 06:32 AM

<<<-- Originally posted by Ken Tanaka : Steven Wills is a new member of our community (http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...&threadid=4648) and he seems to be quite an expert on jibs. (http://home.insightbb.com/~steventv/) Maybe he'll chime in on this thread. -->>>


Just an update...my web site is www.kyvideoservices.com...the other link isn't alive anymore.

Mike Rehmus May 10th, 2004 01:30 PM

<<<-- Originally posted by Chris Hurd :

SkyCrane is an affordable alternative to the ProMax Cobra Crane. It's a prosumer jib for prosumer camcorders. -->>>

And hopefully a whole lot better. I wish I'd have known about the SkyCrane when I bought the ProMax.

AFAIAC, the SkyCrane is not good enough for the PD150 because it twists in three different places. It is fairly good when I use it with my PC-110.

And the supplier is not a good company with which to do business. If the product isn't satisfactory, tough! No returns (and they don't tell you this until you've bought the product).


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:55 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network