Alex Bowles |
December 14th, 2005 08:35 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen L. Noe
You'd need to compare the uncompressed frame's, not the compressed datarate to be more accurate.
|
Really? I assumed that, if you were capturing from tape (i.e. compressed), the most accurate calculation for your project's drive-space needs would be derived from the compressed data rate. The uncompressed data rate would only give you accurate information if you were actually capturing uncompressed data by bypassing tape and coing directly to disk. Or am I missing something?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen L. Noe
Dropout's have not been a problem when sticking to the same tape stock. I have not seen any complaints about dropout's. Have you guys?
|
The guys at B&H in New York were saying that they'd heard about problems from folks who had used standard, consumer grade MiniDV stock. Of course, they were busy offering me Sony's PHDVM-63DM stock for $20 a pop, but I trust that this was real feedback, and not just a hard-sell scare tactic. Also, if you're working with a camera from a rental house, you really have no way of knowing what's been through it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen L. Noe
This depends on the NLE. Liquid is a frame accurate Native HDV NLE. Also there are other solutions that transcode to intermediate codecs that are frame accurate as well.
|
Can these intermediate codecs be written to HDV tape? I realize it isn't the ideal archival format, but if it what's available...
|