DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   JVC GY-HD Series Camera Systems (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/jvc-gy-hd-series-camera-systems/)
-   -   "True Colour" Scene File (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/jvc-gy-hd-series-camera-systems/60835-true-colour-scene-file.html)

Tim Dashwood February 28th, 2006 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paolo Ciccone
I don't want to start arguing about this but I believe my settings, as published, will give you more latitude. But make your own judgement. Take a look at the results from the WFM and vectorscope that I publicshed. Your goal is to make the white chip register at 100 and the black chip at 0. If you look at the result of my gamma/black settings you see that it's pretty damn close to that.
Shoot the same scene with both settings, bring them into your NLE and check the result on a good monitor. Use what you like the most. Using the SD card it's a snap to switch between configurations. Keep in mind that I configured the camera for a "neutral" look. My target is to use all the limited bits available to capture as much as possible, leaving the job of altering and clipping those bit in post. Your approach could be different.

Depending on your type of shooting this could be right or no. You mentioned filmout and so I guess you're gonna shoot in a controlled environment where you can check the light levels. In this case my setings will give you the wide latitude , I believe close to the maximum available with this camera.

Paulo,

Some people are getting confused.
What you have done is bring the camera into a ITU709 (or 601 depending on how DVRAck was setup) color space spec. Bringing the white chip to 100IRE is the OPPOSITE and contradictory of extending latitude (AKA dynamic range.)
This is in no way close to the maximum available latitude with this camera. Your knee is set at 100%... essentially turned off.
Your own histograms prove that knee at 80% and black stretch 3 render the most latitude.
The chips on the DSC chart are not representative of the brightest white in the world or the blackest black, they are just a spec, like colour bars, that allow all of us around the world to be on the same page.

I suggest reading this article by Michael Bergeron. http://www.24pdigitalcinema.com/cinegamma.pdf

It refers to the Panasonic Varicam, but the concepts are exactly the same.

Jim Giberti February 28th, 2006 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paolo Ciccone
Im quite convinced that the disabling the sharpening blurs the images a bit while keeping the sharpening at minimum seems to be the right setting in order to get a nice sharp image that is still soft enough to not look like video.
I also checked the effect of incremental sharpening with a WFM and you can clearly see the addition of video noise.

--
Paolo
http://www.paolociccone.com


Pretty much where I'm at with sharpening as well.

Paolo Ciccone February 28th, 2006 08:04 PM

Hey Tim.

I'm a student of the School of Hard Knocks and you just gave me astrong lesson, thank you! :)
I'm not a cinematographer but I've been a professional bit pusher (aka software engineer) for 20 years and it was hard to figure out that a digital limiter, my own interpretation of the knee circuit, was going to give me more in the end product instead of less. I kinda immagined the knee as something similar to the audio auto level.
I couldn't find clear information about the subject, the most detailed description I found was in a portion of Scott Billps book: "In an attempt to soften the abrupt clip levels of video the knee compression circuit was devised". Of course the word "compression" didn't settle well with me. Later in the page he adds: "while this often creates better looking video, it isn't recommended for video destined for film due to the amount of information that is discarded in the equation" (boldface mine).

The article that you linked partially confirms this and the "squished" result that I'm getting from the WFM, when loading some other configurations, was interpreted by me as loss of data and not as "we are below the threeshold, we are safe".

Sometimes you gotta make a fool of yourself in front of thousands of people in order to gain some knowledge. Fair trade. :)

Anyway, do you know if the cinelike gamma in our camera is equivalent to the cinegamma circuit mentioned in the article?

Thanks again.

--
PaOlo
http://www.paolociccone.com

Stephen L. Noe February 28th, 2006 08:19 PM

Paolo,

The "true color' scene file pulls off some great overall saturation. I had it loaded in the camera while I was driving and shot some out the window stuff.
Lakeshore Drive Chicago IL (175MB) Info about the camera setup is this. I used the "true color" scene file WB 6500. ND2 with Aperature set to around F2.8 and shutter 1/500. The scene file pulls off some great color in this scenario.

Luis Otero February 28th, 2006 08:33 PM

Paolo,

I have been playing utilizing your parameters, and using Tim's Black Stretch and Knee parameters. Let me tell you that such combination has given me by far the best out of the HD100.

Just my 2 cents...

Luis

Paolo Ciccone February 28th, 2006 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Luis Otero
Paolo,

I have been playing utilizing your parameters, and using Tim's Black Stretch and Knee parameters. Let me tell you that such combination has given me by far the best out of the HD100.

Just my 2 cents...

Luis

Hey Luis,

thank you for letting me know. Glad it worked for you. Tomorrow I'm gonna try the different combinations on real life scenes.

Take care.

--
Paolo

Paolo Ciccone February 28th, 2006 10:22 PM

Stephen, that looks so sharp! Thanks!

--
Paolo

DJ Lewis March 2nd, 2006 09:24 PM

What did you guys decide were the best settings for the black stretch and knee parameters?

Paolo Ciccone March 2nd, 2006 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ Lewis
What did you guys decide were the best settings for the black stretch and knee parameters?

Well, Tim has posted his preferences of knee at 80% and black stretch at 3. I have mapped the User 1 and User 2 buttons to Stretch1 and Stretch3 for easy access. I'm running some tests in extreme lighting in order to find out what works best but I haven't decided yet.
I'll post some examples with clips from the camera and corresponding settings as soon as I can.

--
Paolo

Ian E. Pearson March 2nd, 2006 10:00 PM

I dont think there is a best setting for them DJ. It all depends on the situation I think. If you are shooting a scene with a big difference between the light and darks, then you would want to use Tim's wide range settings to get the most detail out of the darkest darks and the lightest lights, but I think you will have minor detail loss in your mids. If you have very evenly lit scene and you use the wide range settings you will be losing detail on either the white or black end because there is no bright whites and dark blacks. So you would be squeezing everything into the mid range and then stretching them back out again in post. Does that sound right? Thats my understanding, but I'm a beginner. This is my first camera.

Luis Otero March 2nd, 2006 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paolo Ciccone
Well, Tim has posted his preferences of knee at 80% and black stretch at 3. I have mapped the User 1 and User 2 buttons to Stretch1 and Stretch3 for easy access. I'm running some tests in extreme lighting in order to find out what works best but I haven't decided yet.
I'll post some examples with clips from the camera and corresponding settings as soon as I can.

--
Paolo

===============================================
Paolo,

I am looking forward to get from you the reporting on your testing (your parameters and Tim's Knee and BS (I mean BS = Black Stretch) settings.

Cheers,

Luis

Stephen L. Noe March 2nd, 2006 10:43 PM

Paolo,

If you get a chance, can you load my DARK INT scene file and take a look at it with your DSC chart. It's working very well in dark scenarios.

Refer to this post

Thanks, Stephen

Brian Drysdale March 3rd, 2006 04:16 AM

Paolo

I'm curious to know if you've had a chance to check your set up numbers with a number of different cameras. You do get variations in these settings between individual cameras, so I was wondering if you'd managed to or were thinking of trying the same DSC chart set up with a couple of other cameras.

I realize the DSC chart is expensive, so not everyone is going to be in position to line up their own camera using one, but it could be worth while knowing the variations that do exist and come up with a good mean setting.

Paolo Ciccone March 3rd, 2006 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Drysdale
Paolo

I'm curious to know if you've had a chance to check your set up numbers with a number of different cameras. You do get variations in these settings between individual cameras, so I was wondering if you'd managed to or were thinking of trying the same DSC chart set up with a couple of other cameras.

I realize the DSC chart is expensive, so not everyone is going to be in position to line up their own camera using one, but it could be worth while knowing the variations that do exist and come up with a good mean setting.

Brian.
I don't have access to other HD100, the one I tested is my own. I do realize that there are variations and tollerances and some cameras might react differently to my settings. Of course this is true about any scene file that we install.
I live in Santa Cruz and I'm defintely available if you are in the area and want to stop by with your HD100 to test it with the chart. Just shoot me an email and we'll arrange for the test.

I believe that an accurate chart is vital for any professional production and, with my article, I wanted to promote the use of it. I see many times that people print charts downloading files from the Net and using their color/laser printer. The truth is that all consumer printers can introduce color bias and shifts even when you pay attention. The DSC charts are expensive. It took me several months before I could force myself to pay the ~$300 for it but I think it's well worth it.

Just my $0.02


--
Paolo

Paolo Ciccone March 3rd, 2006 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen L. Noe
Paolo,

If you get a chance, can you load my DARK INT scene file and take a look at it with your DSC chart. It's working very well in dark scenarios.

Hi Stephen. I will try it asap.

--
Paolo

Brian Drysdale March 3rd, 2006 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paolo Ciccone
I believe that an accurate chart is vital for any professional production and, with my article, I wanted to promote the use of it. I see many times that people print charts downloading files from the Net and using their color/laser printer. The truth is that all consumer printers can introduce color bias and shifts even when you pay attention. The DSC charts are expensive. It took me several months before I could force myself to pay the ~$300 for it but I think it's well worth it.

Just my $0.02


--
Paolo


Thanks, I agree about the DSC or other high quality chart being needed to correctly line up the camera. I've used the DSC with the F900 and the Varicam and it's great.

At the moment I'm just looking at the HD 100 as a possible camera for a number of low budget feature films, so I'm extremely interested in all the issues that have been coming up regarding the camera.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:00 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network