Question for Nate on HD100
 

I asked this on the HD100 board, but I noticed Nate was taking requests. Do you know if the HD60p on the HD100 is similar to the HD60p on the HVX200? I know that you can only achieve that through a component connection, but I love the look of the 60p on the HVX200, and was just curious how the HD60p on the HD100 looked. Thanks.

Looks just fine, as you'd expect. You just have to spend a lot of money and trouble to capture it.

Any chance of a less expensive/less complicated method coming down the pike?

http://www.engr.mun.ca/~wakeham/hdu1.html

cool! Hope it happens.

I've heard about that, but nothing lately. Last I heard, they were having some bugs and issues that needed to be worked out.

I forgot what he though the going price would be for that. I can't wait to see some of their example captures.

This is what happens when someone with serious dyslexia has to try to parapharase stuff rather than just copy and paste. I know. My dad and sister are lawyers and they see the point in this, but it REALLY pisses me off that you can't just quote something from another web site and just site the reference. I'm sorry, but what the hell, my old college (which would kick anyone out if he or she lied, cheated, or stold) would be satisfied with as much.
Sorry, rant over. And thank you for the correction. Hope that didn't mislead anyone.

I'm sure you're already aware of it- but if you haven't tried it out yet- the SD HDV 60p mode which you can record to and capture back from tape looks very, very good and scales up to 720p very well- and requires no special hardware to capture or work with. It's not quite seamless when compared to the native 720p footage- but it still looks better than any SD footage I've seen before from a 1/3" camera.

Where is that article, is that the 4 cameras comparatif? I can't find any other...

Adam also did a review on the HD100, seperate from the DV Magazine's shootout.

This is the URL, but I think you probably need to register at DV.com to read the review...

http://dv.com/reviews/reviews_item.j...leId=185301200

I'm registered. Thank you.

I thought that was the main point of the "fair use" clause in copyright law? That you CAN copy a portion of any copyright work as long as it's specifically for discussing the work itself, and the reference is properly cited. Quoting part of an article to discuss the article falls within that right.

However, it may be that Chris is just being extra cautious and forbidding it entirely to avoid any arguments/legal disputes. I've also seen people get carried away and quote entire articles, which is definitely not allowed in "fair use."

The fair use clause is only a *defense.* I don't want to be put in a position where I have to defend myself in a court of law. It isn't a question of whether or not I would prevail; I simply prefer to avoid that situation altogether.

Content from other sites may not be copied into DV Info Net without prior permission from the source.