NTSC and PAL
There seems to be a lot of headaches around converting from one format to the other. I know it would take years to make a complete changeover, but would it not be much simpler to make an international standard? What was the original motivation behind creating NTSC, PAL, SECAM, etc..
|
PAL, SECAM & MESECAM are based on a 50 cycle electrical system (so 50 fields per second), NTSC is based on a 60 cycle electrical system (60 fields per second). (But in Brazil they use a 60 cycle PAL system, so their cams are NTSC---the only exception I know of.) If you do a google search, put in the words, "world broadcast systems." You'll come up with some good links explaining which/where, and why.
Bottom line: to switch to a 50 field PAL stystem, we'd first have to change our electical system. (If you shoot with a PAL cam in North America, you'll notice big time flickering. Not so, when using a NTSC cam.) |
The story of the rationale between the two incompatible video standards varies with each teller and telling. Some versions relate to the fundamental differences in power standards (120v -vs- 240v, etc.). All seem to be rooted in engineering rather than aesthestics. All are irrelevant; the standards are what they are.
Ultimately I believe that high-definition will be the worldwide standard although pehaps not in our lifetimes. |
Quote:
If not a new standard, then one of the available ones would have to be accepted as overriding. This would mean the US giving up NTSC, or the whole of Europe (except France & Hungary), the whole of Africa (except Algeria), the whole of the middle and far east (except Japan) and the whole of Australasia giving up PAL. Hmmm...come to think of it, I'd rather not downgrade to NTSC, thanks all the same! :-/ |
Here's a link to see which country has what, in way of broadcast systems:
http://www.alkenmrs.com/video/wwstandards1.html#TOP |
HDTV not one-size-fits-all
You should be careful when thinking of HDTV as a one-size-fits-all solution to this standards conversion problem.
HDTV may offer a standard frame size and pixel aspect ratio (well, a small number of these), but it still suffers from the same number of different frame rates as is seen today - 24, 25, 29.97/30 I and P. So the main conversion problem (adjusting frame rate) will likely still remain. Regards, Julian |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:17 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network