Difference between Century .3x Mark 1 and 2?
I was just wondering if anyone had any info on specific differences between the Mark I and Mark II Century Optics .3x fisheyes.
I'm kinda curious if they are optically different at all. Thanks |
It would appear not...
Any comments on EITHER of them then? |
Did I do something wrong here?
|
I don't think anyone knows, sorry. I have no personal experience with the products, nor do I know anyone that does. I also find no reference to the Mark 1 or 2. Is there a mention on their site or have you seen two different models. Does it refer to the larger version (Death and Baby Death)? Any skate boarders or Xtreme sports shooters know?
|
Joshua this should help!
http://www.shumways.net/n/html/artic...r=0&sid=85#173 |
Wow Matt, Thats a great link. That answers just about all my questions.
Thanks! |
No problem .It's a pretty cool site dealing with skateboarding videography.
|
I owned the MKI 58mm screw-mount for my TRV900 a few years ago, then sold that lens on eBay to get the MUCH lighter and more compact MKII 37mm (Baby Death) and only noticed a slight difference between them. The glass quality in both is absolutely perfect, but the wideness is a little bit more on the MKI. I now use the MKII baby death on my PC9, and I have an MKII for my VX2000. bayonet...i wish i'd kept my MKI 58mm as it was MUCH wider than the MKII.
It's almost a good thing though, because the MKII isn't quite as wide which means I can be a little further away while filming skateboarding, which is alot safer (1-2 more feet away could have saved me from many accidents with the MKI) |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:46 PM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network