DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Panasonic DV / MX / GS series Assistant (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/panasonic-dv-mx-gs-series-assistant/)
-   -   MX300 PAL firmware 1.6 solves DV OUT Glitches & IMPROVES OIS by 2X! (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/panasonic-dv-mx-gs-series-assistant/5298-mx300-pal-firmware-1-6-solves-dv-out-glitches-improves-ois-2x.html)

Steven Khong December 4th, 2002 10:03 PM

MX300 PAL firmware 1.6 solves DV OUT Glitches & IMPROVES OIS by 2X!
 
Hi, everybody!

Just want to share the good news! I have had my MX300EN (PAL) upgraded with the latest 1.6 firmware, thanks to advice from Frank Granovski; and Stuart Cooper of Panasonic Australia.

The default firmware in MX300 is version 1.4. Frank got his done in Australia and they have 1.5. Version 1.6 is the latest as of Oct 2002 - that's when mine was upgraded and Panasonic Malaysia had to get the latest firmware from Japan.

Expect the following:

1) No more glitches / video squares when exporting DV out to either my NLE or my Sony Digi8 TRV410E's DV in port.

The glitches appear randomly, lasts for about 2 to 3 frames, where certain squares of misplaced video will appear. By rewinding the tape & playing back the same section you may or MAY NOT encounter the glitches again. Note it only happens with PAL models. I suspect it has to do with my Matrox RT2000 using Texas Instrument DV drivers, and not Microsoft DV drivers.

It was suggested that my NLE could be faulty, but I know my NLE works, and worked fine for the last 2 years - and it's a DUAL Pentium III both CPUs not overclocked at 1 Gigahertz with 1 Gig of PC-133 SDRAM, and RAID using dual 7200 rpm IBM ATA-66 drives, so I don't think it's my system.

How do you explain the fact that if I pump the DV video to my Sony TRV-410E I also get the glitches, when my Sony isn't even recording, but just monitoring?

Whatever, right after the upgrade, I had no more glitches when exporting DV from MX300 to my NLE!


2) Improved OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) by up to 2 times!

Before the upgrade, I could barely hold my MX300 at 6x zoom with one hand. I could manage for just a few seconds before the camera shakes come.

After the upgrade, I can hold it steady with one hand, at up to 12x zoom!

Must be an improvement in the latest upgrade - maybe it shares the same algorithm as the MX350 which has Mega OIS.


I don't know if version 1.5 has this OIS improvement - perhaps Frank can try on his MX300s and comment? Version 1.5 already fixes the DV out glitches problem.



Upgrading firmware has to be done at an authorized Panasonic service center, 'cos you wouldn't have the special software and hardware board required to hook to your MX300. After the upgrade your LCD and Viewfinder has to be calibrated again.

regards,
Steven Khong

Frank Granovski December 4th, 2002 11:40 PM

Guten Abend! You mean I have to send my MX300 to Australia again for the 1.6 upgrade!?

Regarding the OIS, I always found that mine works like a charm, and I could not notice any difference between it and the one on the GL1, TRV900 and VX2000.

I'll check out the OIS at 6X+ tomorrow, when there's light---it's night here now.

Oh, and most of the time I shoot with a tripod, with DIS/OIS "off."

Thanks for your informative post!

Graham Baker December 5th, 2002 02:39 AM

This is good news as the crummy OIS on my MX300 is perhaps the one thing that really bugs me about it compared to my old trv900 - the 900's OIS was way better than *my* MX300.
Seeing as it was me who started this whole glitch problem and firmware upgrade back in Aug last year I guess I should ask my local Panasonic repairer if he has yet got the latest 1.6 update - that might just be enough to make me hold off from upgrading to the MX500 - although I hope to give a '500 a thorough check out (including it's 'mega ois' and the 16:9 resolution etc) this weekend...

Frank Granovski December 5th, 2002 02:48 AM

That's right. YOU ARE the one who first mentioned this glitch problem over on dv.com's camera forum! And I'm sure that many MX300 owners appreciated your information. I for one. Thanks!

When you take the MX500 for a test drive, could you, pretty please, post your findings here? We need more reviews! Heck, I need one. Thanks again.

Do you still post up at dvdoctor? I haven't been there for a while. I still buy those Brit cam mags, "Computer Video" and the other one that you're so fond of (joking).

Yow Cheong Hoe December 5th, 2002 02:59 AM

<<<-- Originally posted by AngryofMayfair : ... I hope to give a '500 a thorough check out (including it's 'mega ois' and the 16:9 resolution etc) this weekend... -->>>

From what I know, the Mega OIS is only for stills, kinda like to save the tripod.

Please do test drive. I gave a very critical review on the MX500. On one hand, I hope that you can reinforce my findings, on the other hand, I am also hoping that the camera is not as bad as I reviewed it to be. Quite a number of people bought the cam, based on the advertisements and hype generated from the advertisements. I know of a few who are in deep regret now...

Steven Khong December 5th, 2002 03:24 AM

Hi, yowch0000.

I agree when you say MX350's MegaOIS is for stills. It says so in the literature. No doubt there.

The bonus is: MegaOIS for 350 works in Movie mode too!

Some background history: Terrence Smith & I went to a shop in Kuala Lumpur to test the MX350 back in July this year, we did a comparison side by side of the MX300 vs MX350 at http://www.mycen.com.my/inbox/mx2.html. I have tested both MX300 & MX350's (MEGA) OIS in movie camera mode.


I better qualify what I mean by "camera shake" first.

Shakes, as in wobble - like the picture is rotating around the center of the picture, slightly counter clockwise & anti counter clockwise alternatively, many times a second. OIS or DIS is designed to minimise this. Turn off OIS from the menu, zoom out, and you will see the camera shake.

This is DIFFERENT from your hand moving left or right or up or down slightly at high zoom magnifications, a small movement equals a big degree in angle. Err... try this. Put your cam on the table, thereby stabilizing it from going up & down. Now zoom out to 6x, and just slightly change the angle by nudging it left or right, and you will notice that the picture has shifted a lot! Hope you get what I mean.... it's like having binoculars but finding it hard to search for the object... No OIS is going to help you with this problem.


At the time of the MX300 vs MX350 test,
when I held the MX300, I could only zoom up to 5x, or 6x MAX if I try really hard, before the camera shakes occur - because the OIS reached its MAX operating capabilities. More shakes / tremors from my hand than the OIS can handle.

When I held the MX350, I could zoom up to 11x, or even 12x if I try really hard, before the camera shakes because the MegaOIS reached its MAX operating capabilities. I was impressed!

What do I mean by "try really hard?". 5x & 11x is achievable with one hand. 6x & 12x can be achieved by steadying the cam with 2 hands. 6x & 12x can also be done with one hand, but you need really steady hands. I better qualify that with the fact that I've done many shoots with heavy Sony handheld camcorders, with one hand, shooting at zoom for minutes at a time, for many years now. So my hand is quite steady.

Anyways, I ended up buying the MX300.


This weekend, I hope to meet Terrence and compare our MX300s since his is still with the original firmware. Then he can test out my new "MegaOIS" enabled MX300 too. Will keep you all informed.

regards,
Steven Khong

Yow Cheong Hoe December 5th, 2002 03:48 AM

Steven,

I need you to clarify 'camera'. I think you mean 'video camera' mode, as opposed to 'still camera' mode.

Does it mean that all this time, I was shooting with OIS (as shown on the screen) but Mega OIS is actually running on my MX350? Or do I need to upgrade the firmware?

I have the MX350 with me now, but under tape mode (video) the OIS seems less 'powerful' in stabilizing than the Mega OIS in card mode (stills). I see this as the different between OIS and Mega OIS. In any case, if Mega is already enabled, then I've been living in bliss without knowing it. The performance of the MX8 is very similar to the MX350, maybe the Mega is also activated for video on the MX8, too!

I have rather steady hands, too (from a few years of being in the air-rifle team and a few more doing videos), and I am very thankful that the OIS helps when a tripod in not available.

Yow Cheong Hoe December 5th, 2002 03:50 AM

BTW, please call me YowCH, the '000' is to make the minimum name length.

Hope to meet you one day, I'm also Malaysian.

Steven Khong December 5th, 2002 05:30 PM

Hi, YowCH!

Glad to meet another Malaysian! Sure, sometimes I go to Singapore, we can meet. Or if you get back "home" to PJ or KL we can meet too. Where's your hometown?

Yes, you are right - when I said "Movie mode" I meant Video Camera mode. To be more precise: I know from my earlier testing with the MX350 that MegaOIS works in Camera- Tape as well as Camera- Card (that's how it's written on my MX300).

Most likely you perceive the MegaOIS works better in Camera - Card 'cos of the "Progressive scan" still picture capabilities are VERY IMPRESSIVE at reducing blur.

The Camera- Tape mode's equivalent is Frame Mode. If you are NOT in Frame Mode (25 fps) then when you press the PhotoShot button to take a 7 second still with sound, and you accidentally shake the camera too much, or there's motion in the scene itself, then you will get horrible "jaggies" - the interleave effect - when you try to lift a still frame from the video with your NLE. Frame mode is nice when you need to lift nice stills from the video. Perhaps other forum members can elaborate?

Note that Camera- Card even has a "light booster" / Gain where in low light, when taking stills, the picture is brightened. That's when the "candle"Card (looks like ICARD) appears on the screen.

Besides, how many still cameras out there have a OIS built in?

Back to video...

Like I wrote earlier, in an actual side by side, same scene comparison, the MegaOIS on the MX350 is better than the OIS on the default firmware of the MX300. The barrel shape of the MX350 also helps me to better get my fingers wrapped around the cam, improving stability as well. I have yet to test my new firmware MX350 with a MX350 (anybody in PJ / KL area with one?).

Therefore I don't think you need a new firmware upgrade for your MX350. Your MX350 already beats the default firmware MX300.

Yow Cheong Hoe December 5th, 2002 08:01 PM

Hi Steven,

From PJ, too! SS4C, but now staying full time in Singapore.

I'll be back the week before Chinese New Year.

Back to OIS, my MX8 is currently away in Philipines on a mission trip (my good friend/brother took it, he's from JB but now in KL). I'll test the MX8 side-by-side the MX350 when it comes back.

I have not seen anyone using the MX300 here in Singapore, although it was available for sale. Maybe someday I'll get to test them side-by-side.

Hi angryOfMayfair,

How's the MX500 test drive?

Hi Frank G,

Is there any difference in using OIS and not while on tripod? I know that sometimes, when I pan really slowly, the camera 'thinks' that it's shake and startup the OIS, hence making my pan very jittery!

Frank Granovski December 5th, 2002 08:17 PM

>Is there any difference in using OIS and not while on tripod? I know that sometimes, when I pan really slowly, the camera 'thinks' that it's shake and startup the OIS, hence making my pan very jittery!<

I shut of the OIS when using a tripod. I've seen no jitters. I haven't tried the 6X zoom test yet. I'm going to go into the parkade later, and try it, to see if I get "jitters" from 6X and on.

I'm waiting for Pana's answer concerning this firmware upgrade. I recieved about 10 files from them today with strange extentions---waiting back about this too! Heck, I don't have a clue about what these are! They took almost an hour to come in as attachments on an e-mail. Crazy.

***Concerning circular verses linear polarizers for the MX line of cams, either type will work.***

Frank Granovski December 6th, 2002 05:43 AM

You're right, Steven. In 6X and up in auto, the video dances around like a nutty drunk doing a jig in high speed. It's crazy! Jittery is understating this problem! Man..., I guess my MX is going back to AU, and if I'm lucky, I'll have it back by spring. I'm not happy.

I thought this was normal before. I should have known something wasn't right. My DVL9500s with DIS don't do this. And neither does the GL1 and PD100 I've used many times in the past---heck, the VX2000 doesn't have these jitters either (I must be getting old, and relying too much on my tripod.)

Steven, I owe you a Cuban cigar!

Graham Baker December 7th, 2002 06:05 PM

G'day Yowch, Frank & Steven,
Sorry to have to tell you that I have not been able to check out the MX500 - too many things happening and Christmas just around the corner - hopefully I will find some time over the next week or two - I would like the MX500 over the 300 for a number of reasons - better OIS, bigger screen, USB streaming, hi-res 16:9 mode, extra record button and cord remote - both *very* useful!, also better battery life due to *less* power consumption, oh and the built in flash is nice - lots of good things BUT the video quality has to be at least as good as the MX300 otherwise I will not be upgrading!

I was so close to checking out the MX500 on Wednesday - I was 10 mins away from Tasman AV and I rang them to make sure thay had a 500 in stock - they said they were nil stock so I turned around and drove in the opposite direction, 40 mins later they rang back to say sorry - they had 4 in stock all the time! Argh!

In the meantime I will pester my Panasonic Authorised repairer in Melb for the 1.6 upgrade for my '300 - thanks again Steven

Cheers for now

Yow Cheong Hoe December 8th, 2002 07:17 PM

My comparison shows that the video quality of the MX500 is very similar to that of the MX350 (which is similar to the MX300).

My cons on the MX500 are early use of digital gain (smaller CCDs?), and when digital gain is activated grain. Also, higher minimum lux of 10 (the camera goes blind at 10 lux!) and poor LCD brightness (what I see is about 1 F-stop dimmer than what I get).

Frank Granovski December 8th, 2002 08:38 PM

Yowch000, thanks. Actually, I'll have some MX500 resolution details soon, and I've already have detailed info about the firmware version 1.6 upgrade. I'll be posting this info soon (in a couple of hours).

Steven Khong December 9th, 2002 11:04 PM

Hi, all!

Met with Terrence yesterday & tried out his (default firmware, not upgraded) MX300 against mine 1.6 firmware MX300.

Yup, the OIS on my firmware 1.6 MX300 is better. Maybe a bit TOO SLIGHT of an improvement for those with STEADY hands. Perhaps it was the coffee (French coffee at Delifrance) we were drinking?

Also tried the Terrence's Panasonic 2X converter at max zoom - the improvement can be noticed - though there were a few minor shakes at max zoom, the my 1.6 firmware definitely makes a difference.

Waiting for Frank's details on the 1.6 - maybe there's more hidden "goodies"....

Frank Granovski December 10th, 2002 01:38 AM

I've recieved some info, but Pana AU is still looking into it. So far the only thing they know is that the revised firmware "improves performance," and overcomes "a problem with capture to PC. The upgrade addresses an issue with Motion DVSTUDIO editing software."

So is Terrence going to get the firmware version 1.6 upgrade? Or does he think it's a minor issue that's not important? Terrence?

Steven Khong December 11th, 2002 01:17 AM

Personally, I think that if you absolutely NEED the features in firmware 1.6, then you should go for upgrading.


If you have the 2X teleconverter then I think you would benefit from the improved OIS. Gives more stability to your zoomed out shots.

But if you don't even zoom out further than 5x or have very steady hands, then you may not see the need the 1.6 upgrade.


Some folks don't use their vidcam to play back their DV tape (Terrence is one of them). Some folks use a tripod most of the time so the OIS is a non issue - Frank, that'll be you!

As for me, I don't have any other DV cam or tape deck, so I got to have my MX300 firmware upgraded. My other cam is a Sony Digital8 using Hi-8 tapes. One day I'll get a proper deck or maybe even a cheap DV cam as backup .

I also take a lot of video "on the go" where carrying & setting up tripods multiple times is a hassle - then I have to depend on my cam's OIS. Wedding banquets, sports events, & holiday tours come to mind.

Sure, for a proper controlled shoot with little time limitations, I would lug around my tripod & set it up properly - then I can zoom as much as I want.

For casual & quick, discreet "on the street" shooting I would draw more attention to myself with a tripod..


One word of warning though... when my firmware got upgraded they forgot to recalibrate my LCD & viewfinder colors, so the colors were rather "off". Looks like firmware upgrades can wipe out your default color data! Had to send it back to get it fixed.

I'll pop a note to Terrence to remind him to read this post & comment.

Regards,
Steven Khong

Adams Sin December 13th, 2002 07:56 AM

Upgrade to Firmware 1.6
 
Nice to meet u all here, I come from Hong Kong. I am surprise that in Malaysia, u can upgrade the firmware. Bcos I have asked my local dealer and repair centre, the reply is no such services and not hearing or receiving any news about this. Very disappointing to me. I have also encounter and experience the glitching problem when I capture the movie by Pinnacle DV500Plus. So is there any way to upgrade the firmware? I really want to know.

Frank Granovski December 13th, 2002 03:39 PM

You'll have to contact Panasonic for this. They need a special setup/tools for this firmware upgrade. (I had to send my cam to Australia, from Canada, because Panasonic Canada and Panasonic USA didn't have this "setup.") Go figure!

Adams Sin December 14th, 2002 09:49 AM

Secure to send My Cam to Australia for upgrading fireware?
 
Thank you for your suggestion.

I want to know where I send and is it secure to send to Australia? And is there any document needed?

Zac Stein December 14th, 2002 10:02 AM

Adams sin,

Depends what you mean about sending it to australia. Panasonic here are actually very good at responding to needs, when i wanted to region modify my dvd player, the panasonic rep came to my house the very day from ringing and dropped me off a dvd-r of the software for unlocking my dvd player.

But their stuff is so widely excepted and they have many support centers all over the place.

For you needs contact panasonic if your area, and let them do the sending, if they have problems, well they have them not you.

You could always send it to me, I am in Australia, i am not a panasonic rep, but i love new free toys (grins).

kermie

Frank Granovski December 14th, 2002 05:44 PM

If you don't know who/where the regional Panasonic is for Hong Kong, I can give you an e-mail of a friend and fellow DV nut who lives in Hong Kong. I'm sure he can help. Let me know.

PS: I sent my cam to Australia because I bought the cam from Australia, via mail order / FEDEX / [IMG]www.cameraaction.com.au[/IMG].

Adams Sin December 15th, 2002 10:51 AM

Thank you
 
Frank, thank you for help, Please give me your friend's email.
:-)

Frank Granovski December 15th, 2002 07:24 PM

yan chan
(Vincent Chan)

vincent_ysc1@hotmail.com

Steven Khong December 16th, 2002 08:30 PM

Hi, Adams!

As Frank suggests, you should send it back (to the country) where you bought it from. Just in case they accidentally did something wrong with your vidcam & you need to rectify it quick. You may not want the frustration, waiting around & having your cam flying back & forth around the world...

If you have the international warranty, I think you can even take a trip to Singapore or Australia, send it in to Panasonic & wait... but that's not very practical. They will charge you labour charges & who knows how long you have to wait.


Well, you were right in being surprised about Malaysia being able to do the upgrade...
The very first time I sent my MX300 to Panasonic Malaysia, they had to get back to Japan regarding the firmware upgrade. I had to wait for some time (a few months!) before Panasonic Japan finally sent the latest 1.6 firmware to Panasonic Malaysia. Most likely it's the first time Japan has heard about this glitches thing. Sorry if this sounds racial, but I mean it in the best of light, it's their strength: Japanese are very methodical & want to check & double check & sit in lots of meetings to get a group concencus before taking action...

P. Malaysia had the hardware bits as well as the default program / firmware so they could do color adjustments etc. However, the firmware they had was for version 1.4 - the same that you get in your MX300 when it left the factory in Japan.

I was also in contact with Panasonic Australia via Stuart Cooper (thanks to Frank) who later emailed me a PDF concerning my problem and how to fix it. Things moved faster after I sent P. Malaysia this PDF. I will send it to you too & Frank as well so that we can help other MX300 PAL users.


The case may be that Panasonic Hong Kong has to get back to Panasonic Japan before they can get the firmware upgrade. And P. Hong Kong must have a reason to get this firmware upgrade - to fix your glitches problem. If you don't send it to them, P. Hong Kong will not get the latest firmware. I just hope you don't have to wait too long.

I believe that it's company policy to follow the "proper chain of command" / proper channels. I suggested to P. Malaysia to directly email P. Australia but I was told they had to ask P. Japan directly.

Hope that helps!
Steven Khong

Steven Khong December 16th, 2002 08:58 PM

Oops! Looks like Adams doesn't have a listed email. Can you get it from Frank? For Frank's email, go to a post by Frank and click on the email button. I just posted it to him.

Adams Sin December 16th, 2002 09:04 PM

Steven,

Thank your for your suggestion

:-)

B.Regards
Adams

Frank Granovski December 16th, 2002 10:50 PM

Thanks Steven. I uploaded that pdf file at:

http://www.dvfreak.com/pana_mx5.htm

Perhaps you can check to see if the download works. The file is called, "techbull.pdf."

Adams Sin December 16th, 2002 11:05 PM

Thanks again,

But I find the link is only for introduction of MX500

If the pdf file u are in hand, would u mind sending me by my email adamssin@hongkong.com
:-)

Adams

Frank Granovski December 17th, 2002 12:13 AM

It's there, I just checked it. Just click on that link, then it will either open up in your PDF reader, or you can save it (download it to your computer). It's a small file.

Frank Granovski December 17th, 2002 03:15 AM

Fixed. (Sorry.) I was too hasty.

Steven Khong February 19th, 2003 08:17 PM

I think to make it easier for people to see this, better bump it up.

Steven Khong February 25th, 2003 10:10 PM

I realized that somehow, Macintosh owners don't complain about this DV OUT glitch problem. I know this guy Bo in Netherlands who's not upgraded his MX300, and uses a Mac, but has never seen the glitches problem.

Most likely it's to do with the DV drivers (my bet is on the Texas Instrument drivers) on the PC that are buggy?

Frank Granovski February 26th, 2003 12:11 AM

You got me. I don't know who makes these drivers and which work and which do not. I'm like most people: if it works, great; if it doesn't, I bitch! (My wife bitches more than me, thank G_d!)

Alan Suen February 26th, 2003 07:07 PM

I bought my MX 300EN in Hong Kong is well. Shun Hing is useless. They refuse to do any firmware upgrade on my camera. And they keep blaming the problem on my computer. So I was really pi*s off with them.

I contacted Panasonic Australia. They acknowledged the problem straight away, and refer me to one of their service centre. They did the firmware upgrade for me while I wait.

Let me know if you more info

You can email me on mgmoo2@hotmail.com

Alan


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:45 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network