![]() |
Re: Olympus 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 II?
Gary, after much searching, the AF with the 12-60mm apparently works. I thank you for your input, it was a huge help. I sprung for the 12mm only wish I could compare them both in low light.
|
Re: Olympus 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 II?
Nice, though 12mm F2 Olympus instead perhaps?
|
Re: Olympus 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 II?
Gary, I received the 12mm F/2.0 yesterday, it is a fine lens. I haven't gotten continuous focusing to work, much to my dismay, but that could be an issue with settings, don't know.
It is a great lens, images are the best. I edited my post above. I was referring to the 12-60 as the 12mm , which was confusing as hell, even to me, and I wrote it! |
Re: Olympus 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 II?
Nice, can't wait to see how it does. Wanted to use it for glidecam work and have some form of autofocus and low light performance in one. 20mm 1.7, while doable on a glidecam, is prone to luck with the AF, so 12mm should be an instant improvement over the pancake for glidecam
|
Re: Olympus 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 II?
Autofocus is instant, it's so fast I can't believe it. I haven't tried autofocus in dim light, but will soon. Gary, lens was made for glidecam, you'll love it.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:54 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network