DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Photon Management (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/photon-management/)
-   -   Test lighting setup with analog camera (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/photon-management/9405-test-lighting-setup-analog-camera.html)

Rob Belics May 7th, 2003 05:21 PM

Test lighting setup with analog camera
 
How would it compare to a dv camera if you used an analog camera to test the lighting setup on a location beforehand? If it looks good and balanced on the analog's viewfinder are you probably OK, or at least close, on the dv camera?

Charles Papert May 7th, 2003 05:23 PM

Depends on the vintage of the camera used...the recording medium won't affect contrast as much as the chips and processing of the individual camera. But chances are very good that if it looks decent on the analog camera, it will look even better on digital.

Bryan Beasleigh May 7th, 2003 06:38 PM

That's where a good field monitor would come in handy for someone like me. Even a 13" Toshiba or JVC cheapy would be better than a sharp stick in the eye. I was looking at the toshiba 14" with 400 lines and a flat square tube but the weight is 24 lbs. JVC has a 9" with blue check, overscan and wide mode for under $600. chris ha d posted a link to Panny 7'' that's supposed to be great.

Then again for $100 the Toshiba and JVC have a decent tube.

Mike Rehmus May 9th, 2003 10:05 PM

I found a nice used Sony 9" hi-res field monitor that will run off of 12 vdc, NP1B batteries or AC line. They go for around $400 give or take. It came in a Portabrace case so I can hang it on the tripod along with a battery belt and be much more certain that what I want is what I get.

Brian, you were investigating LCD panels a while back. Did you conclude that they weren't for you?

I recently purchased a 17" HD LCD (Samsung) TV for displaying my work to small groups. It has a line doubler that makes the images look really good. However, it's a bit big and it washes out too easily for field monitor use. The 15" version might be OK though if you could construct a viewing hood.

Bryan Beasleigh May 9th, 2003 11:03 PM

I got side tracked today while shopping for a matte box. A 9" JVC TM910SU followed me home. I may go back and buy the Kata Momo bag on monday. Monitors can be costly here in canada the little JVC was $1050. That's about the best you can do anywhere up here.

It's got Blue check, underscan and switchable aspect ratio.

Wayne Orr May 10th, 2003 02:32 PM

Re: Test lighting setup with analog camera
 
<<<-- Originally posted by Rob Belics : How would it compare to a dv camera if you used an analog camera to test the lighting setup on a location beforehand? If it looks good and balanced on the analog's viewfinder are you probably OK, or at least close, on the dv camera? -->>>

Is it just me? I don't get this question. How do you check lighting on the viewfinder of an analog camera? Is Rob talking about a small format camera? I would love some more information so I can make a confusing suggestion.

Charles Papert May 10th, 2003 06:55 PM

See, I just went ahead and posted my confusing answer, without realizing that I hadn't read the question properly. I assumed that the analog camera was going to be played back on a monitor and the analysis done there. Thanks, Wayne!

Rob Belics May 11th, 2003 08:33 AM

What I'm talking about is: You have a DV camera at one location taping a scene. At a second location you use the analog camera to check/view the lighting to see contrast, shadow detail, etc. to make sure everything looks OK before the DV camera arrives later.

The question is, how close will the analog camera's view look to the DV's view when it arrives?

Michael Morlan May 17th, 2003 10:15 PM

Rob,

Coming from lighting for film, I would submit that you shouldn't use another camera to set lighting for your main camera -- unless you have tested and documented everything about each including color and contrast response. It might be easier to light with a meter (or your eyes when you've done it a few times.)

When getting to know my camera I perform a few tests and thoroughly document its response to color and contrast - creating exposure and colorimetry charts that I can refer to later. I'll document the equivalent exposure index of the camera. Once I've got the technology out of the way, I'll judge its picture artistically, seeing how it responds in different lighting environments and when I push its limits. I'll eyeball those same environments and build a visual memory for how a space looks to my eye and the camera.

On the set, I'll pick my angles by eye or director's viewfinder. Then I use my cine spot/incident meters when lighting a set. That'll get me most of the way. (It's also safer since the fragile and expensive camera is not in the way when moving a bunch of lights around.

Then I bring in the camera and finish with a monitor and/or scope.

Here's a couple of pages I keep for my GY-DV500 camera. They show the results of my initial tests of the camera along with an interesting, free substitute technique for those "warm cards" that have arrived on the market recently.

http://www.michael-morlan.net/projects/dv500/dv500_exposure_tests.htm

http://www.michael-morlan.net/projects/dv500/dv500_color_balancing_with_gels.htm

Hope this helps,

Michael


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:42 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2021 The Digital Video Information Network