DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Show Your Work (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/show-your-work/)
-   -   Trailer for my new feature, THE WATERMELON! (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/show-your-work/104570-trailer-my-new-feature-watermelon.html)

Lori Starfelt September 28th, 2007 11:33 AM

Trailer for my new feature, THE WATERMELON!
 
This past summer we shot The Watermelon - a feature film based on an award-winning script by Michael Hemmingson. We just finished our first cut and are moving on to the polish. Brad - the director/editor - took time out to cut a trailer. I hope you like it.

http://www.bradmays.com/watermelonstream.mov

Ethan Cooper September 28th, 2007 11:51 AM

It's fugly.

Lori Starfelt September 28th, 2007 03:53 PM

I won't let you steal away the last thing my
 
daddy left to me!!!!

So, are you agreeing with the trailer?

Emre Safak September 28th, 2007 06:16 PM

Do you have a slow server? It took me ages to stream it. I gave up at the point they said fugly. I hope my connection is acting up.

Lori Starfelt September 28th, 2007 06:25 PM

Hmmm, it's on ATT, so I don't know why it would
 
be slow. It is a fairly large file. Maybe we should make the image smaller.

Thanks for the heads up. If someone else has this problem, please let me know.

Kevin Randolph September 28th, 2007 07:09 PM

I liked the trailer. The acting seemed appropriately over the top and the cinematography looked really good - well controlled.

There's just one thing... when I watched it, the audio had a weird, underwater, warble to it. I'm sure that it wasn't recorded that way, seeing all the care you took with the lighting and acting, but I couldn't get past it.

Also, I'll concur, it took a minute to stream, but it was worth the minute.

And yes... it's fugly ;)

Marcus Marchesseault September 28th, 2007 09:14 PM

I agree with Kevin on all accounts except it played quickly. Go figure. I'm in the middle of the Pacific ocean and it plays fine for me.

The audio effect sounds like the audio effect called a flanger. I think it is from two identical sources slightly out of phase. I have also heard a bit of this effect from audio noise reduction software. Was noise reduction used on the audio or could the L and R channels be out of phase?

Lori Starfelt September 28th, 2007 10:28 PM

Something must have happened in the conversion. The audio streams sound great. Anyway, I'm glad you like it.

We don't have any credits on the trailer so for the record, the DP is the brilliant Lawrence Malloy.
http://www.lawrencemalloy.com

And the rest of the credits:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0945521/fullcredits

Jimi King September 28th, 2007 11:54 PM

Looks good.
What kind of camera did you use?

Daniel Ross September 29th, 2007 12:30 AM

Not bad at all. Very strange, but probably in a good way. We'll have to see soon.

Emre Safak September 29th, 2007 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcus Marchesseault (Post 751678)
The audio effect sounds like the audio effect called a flanger. I think it is from two identical sources slightly out of phase. I have also heard a bit of this effect from audio noise reduction software. Was noise reduction used on the audio or could the L and R channels be out of phase?

I noticed that effect too. It also happens when you use too much noise reduction, or too low a bit rate for encoding (the most likely suspect).

Bruce Nelson September 29th, 2007 11:35 AM

Loved the trailer about a trailer. What plans do you have for showing it? Or, more to the point what chance would an ordinary guy like me have to get to see the final product?

Lori Starfelt September 29th, 2007 11:51 AM

Emre - thank you. We're going to redo it today and hopefully that problem will end. We don't have a lot of experience preparing footage for the internet so your guidance is appreciated.

Jimi - we shot it on the Panasonic 24p system - it's a beautiful thing. Truly. It gets us so much closer to Truffault's dictum that cinema will be art when film is as cheap as crayons.

Bruce - as for seeing it, we're going to go the festival route. I knew the script was brilliant for festivals. An eccentric, well-written story filled with charming three-dimensional characters - it's perfect indie festival fare. As for distribution, we just finished our first cut this week. We still have a couple week of polishing to go. We'll take it from there. :) Thanks for asking.

Brian Duke September 29th, 2007 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lori Starfelt (Post 751879)
Emre - thank you. We're going to redo it today and hopefully that problem will end. We don't have a lot of experience preparing footage for the internet so your guidance is appreciated.

Jimi - we shot it on the Panasonic 24p system - it's a beautiful thing. Truly. It gets us so much closer to Truffault's dictum that cinema will be art when film is as cheap as crayons.

Bruce - as for seeing it, we're going to go the festival route. I knew the script was brilliant for festivals. An eccentric, well-written story filled with charming three-dimensional characters - it's perfect indie festival fare. As for distribution, we just finished our first cut this week. We still have a couple week of polishing to go. We'll take it from there. :) Thanks for asking.

How long do you think it will take from finishing the principal photography until you are done with editing, sound and music etc? How many months do you anticipate?

Lori Starfelt September 29th, 2007 10:42 PM

Brian, We plan on being done by the end of the year. We'll have the cut locked within a week or so. We have some special effects work we need done, and then we have to figure out the score. So overall, five months beginning to end.

Lori Starfelt October 8th, 2007 10:44 PM

New and Improved Watermelon trailer!!! I've got it up on YouTube because streaming it from our site seems to be causing problems for people. I think it's very good. it tells a lot more of the story.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDimaB95fK0

Greg Quinn October 9th, 2007 01:24 AM

This looks really good (both the trailer and what you're selling with the trailer). Well done. Photography looks really nice.

Can I ask what procedure you used for the Youtube upload? (I'm also trying to get 24P HD uploads and they turn out like crap).

Greg

Lori Starfelt October 9th, 2007 01:52 AM

We down converted the footage from our main time line into DV Pro anamorphic 16:9 interlaced at 29.97. Then using that single file, we edited the trailer together. We then rendered that as a single DV PRO file, which we then compressed to Sorenson Three, medium resolution setting. And that's what we uploaded online.

We're not experts on preparing footage for internet streaming, by any means. Brad is not sure he even did it right but the results seems reasonable so he's fine with it. But there are people who know infinitely more about this stuff than we do, and we'd certainly like to meet a few of them. :)

Elmer Lang October 9th, 2007 08:23 AM

Quite a cast of characters you got there. As you said, you may well have indie gold! I didn't notice any problems with the youtube version. Good luck!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network