![]() |
re: alternative to 320
Quote:
Not so on the PMW-350, is it? |
re: alternative to 320
Cees
the lens works very well on the 320 but i had to buy the nikon to half inch sony bay optical converter from Century Schneider optics, I don't know about the 350 |
re: alternative to 320
Quote:
Theoretically, lenses designed for single sensors are likely to have flaws when used with three chippers, and vice versa, due to differing designs suitable for a single image plane versus via a beam splitter. Likewise, a lens may have resolution optimised for full design coverage, and used for a smaller image may look soft compared to a lens optimised for 1/2 or 2/3". Practically, use what you can afford....... :-) |
re: alternative to 320
Thanks David for your reply. I use the EX3 with Nikon lenses, so I am familiar with the effect of still lenses on smaller chip cameras. I have been told once that you can not use still lenses on 2/3" cameras, due to the flange distance between the lens and the chips. Started to wonder now if that is also the case with the 350 (being a 2/3" camera), since it seems to be possible with its 1/2" sister camera, the 320.
|
Re: alternative to 320
Cees is correct the flange back for the 2/3" cameras is about 10mm longer than the 1/2" cameras so you can't use most of the common DSLR lenses. Some DSLR lenses can be adapted to work with 2/3" cameras by fitting a B4 flange to the back of the lens.
|
Re: alternative to 320
This is a video i shot with the EX3 with nano of the snow in 2010 |
Re: alternative to 320
Quote:
|
Re: alternative to 320
Quote:
So the 320 with it's 1/2" chips may well be best bet for the intended purpose. |
Re: alternative to 320
Quote:
As far as optical quality goes, a B4 could look great (such as a DigiPrime or high-end Fujinon or Canon ENG lens) or it could look like crap at the lower end of the price scale with a cheap lens. All B4 means is that it has a certain type of docking collar and interface for communicating with the camera. |
Re: alternative to 320
Thanks for the explanation Doug. The difficult question is which dslr lenses could possibly be used with for example a PMW-500 and what adapting it takes. But I guess with my large set of Nikon primes it is not a logical/feasible option to move towards a PMW-500. I want to upgrade from my EX3, especially regarding noise. The upcoming large sensor cameras F5/55 are very promising, but a smaller sensor is very beneficial in my wildlife filming. It is a pity that with smaller 3-chip cameras (1/3" and 1/2") dslr lenses are usable, the same for the larger 1 chip cameras, but just the good 2/3" cameras do not match with the dslr lenses. Alas.
|
Re: alternative to 320
I know it would be a total waste of your Nikons.. but if you could get a 500 with a nice(maybe second hand) B4 2/3 inch standard zoom with a doubler.. you,d be really well set up.. providing you had also a decent tripod of course..
The digital extender function is also pretty good with the 500.. when set to assignable just one quick push of a button and boom.. X2 extender.. no fussing with the iris focus etc.. But yes a pretty big xmas present to yourself.. which Iam sure you richly deserve.. :) |
Re: alternative to 320
I sent Santa Claus my wish list, but she said .....NO
Bad luck. I better stick to my dslr lenses and keep an eye on the F55 |
Re: alternative to 320
haha... well F55 ... could be worse.. !!
|
Re: alternative to 320
Yeh, but santa claus doesn't know yet.Still have to find a way to gently tell her.
|
Re: alternative to 320
Do what I do. buy it, keep it on the down low then when shes see's it tell her you got it a long time ago. :-0
hey it works sometimes! O|O \--/ |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:55 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network