fast frame/sec
Good Morning,
Does anyone have some footage of the 6 seconds of slo motion the camera can do!!!! |
Dale,
Do a YouTube search for 'firelighter'. I saw this example posted the other day and it's impressive. Shot at 240 frames/sec. I didn't realize the V1 had this capability. -gb- |
Quote:
240 frames per sec... yes! |
The slo-mo footage isn't progressive, so doesn't that make it 240 fields a sec? (And, I think it's actually 250)
|
240 / 4 = 60
Pretty sure it's fields, 240 frames would be rediculous. 120 frames isn't THAT unbelievable if it's for a short burst (camera can store that in a buffer) Thought it was for 12 seconds? Either way I want an FX7 to test it out :) |
The super-slo-mo feature is of such poor quality I find it unusable. It's only good for checking your golf swing or something. It would never work for broadcast, maybe web but you'll see, it's all blocky.
|
Quote:
Sorry for the confusion..! |
I've been disappointed with the in-camera slo mo effect.
I think I get a better image applying After Effects Timewarp in post. That adds some softness to the image, but doesn't generate the other kinds of artifacts I see in my V1 in-camera effect. The one suggested thing I haven't tried yet is to shoot the slo mo in HDV, bring it into the NLE as Cineform CFHD avi, convert the CFHD directly to standard def m2v, burn it to a DVD and watch it on a TV monitor. That's supposed to give a more acceptable image, similar to what you see on the Sony V1 demo DVD. I would appreciate hearing from anyone who has done something like this. If not, I'll try it myself and report back. |
Anyone try converting their slow motion footage to progressive?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:48 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network