DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Sony HVR-V1 / HDR-FX7 (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-hvr-v1-hdr-fx7/)
-   -   fast frame/sec (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-hvr-v1-hdr-fx7/95675-fast-frame-sec.html)

Dale Guthormsen June 3rd, 2007 09:36 AM

fast frame/sec
 
Good Morning,

Does anyone have some footage of the 6 seconds of slo motion the camera can do!!!!

Greg Boston June 3rd, 2007 09:42 AM

Dale,

Do a YouTube search for 'firelighter'. I saw this example posted the other day and it's impressive. Shot at 240 frames/sec. I didn't realize the V1 had this capability.

-gb-

Stu Holmes June 3rd, 2007 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg Boston (Post 691170)
Shot at 240 frames/sec. I didn't realize the V1 had this capability.

-gb-

V1 can't shoot at 240 fields per sec...
240 frames per sec... yes!

Brad Bodily June 4th, 2007 05:17 PM

The slo-mo footage isn't progressive, so doesn't that make it 240 fields a sec? (And, I think it's actually 250)

Joe Busch June 4th, 2007 08:57 PM

240 / 4 = 60

Pretty sure it's fields, 240 frames would be rediculous.

120 frames isn't THAT unbelievable if it's for a short burst (camera can store that in a buffer)

Thought it was for 12 seconds?

Either way I want an FX7 to test it out :)

Paul Frederick June 5th, 2007 06:18 AM

The super-slo-mo feature is of such poor quality I find it unusable. It's only good for checking your golf swing or something. It would never work for broadcast, maybe web but you'll see, it's all blocky.

Stu Holmes June 5th, 2007 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu Holmes (Post 691359)
V1 can't shoot at 240 fields per sec...
240 frames per sec... yes!

Sorry my typo... got that the wrong way round... it's 240fields per sec which = 120frames per sec.
Sorry for the confusion..!

Robert Young June 5th, 2007 05:45 PM

I've been disappointed with the in-camera slo mo effect.
I think I get a better image applying After Effects Timewarp in post. That adds some softness to the image, but doesn't generate the other kinds of artifacts I see in my V1 in-camera effect.
The one suggested thing I haven't tried yet is to shoot the slo mo in HDV, bring it into the NLE as Cineform CFHD avi, convert the CFHD directly to standard def m2v, burn it to a DVD and watch it on a TV monitor. That's supposed to give a more acceptable image, similar to what you see on the Sony V1 demo DVD.
I would appreciate hearing from anyone who has done something like this. If not, I'll try it myself and report back.

Joe Busch June 5th, 2007 09:04 PM

Anyone try converting their slow motion footage to progressive?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:48 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network