DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Sony HVR-Z5 / HDR-FX1000 (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-hvr-z5-hdr-fx1000/)
-   -   What camera to match FX1000? (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-hvr-z5-hdr-fx1000/264014-what-camera-match-fx1000.html)

Lukas Siewior August 10th, 2009 07:33 PM

What camera to match FX1000?
 
I'm thinking about next purchase for my business for next wedding season. I'd love to upgrade my 2nd camera with something similar to FX1000. Something easy to match in post. Compatible with HDV format. Decent in low-light (2nd cam has always on-camera light, so darkness is not a big issue here). What would be your suggestions (other then another FX1000 or Z5)?

Mel Enriquez August 11th, 2009 07:33 AM

xr-500
 
Lukas,

Are you amenable to a small camera like the HC9 Sony matches well with Sony cameras? However, if you are willing to adjust a bit in post, I would recommend the Canon HV-30 or the HV-40. It is very good in low light, cheap at U$800 and HDV. It might even put to shame your FX-1000 in low light!

Otherwise, only another FX-1000 would suit you. I can't see the FX-7 to be good in low light and may cause you to be unhappy.


If you loosen your specs a bit, you can opt for an avchd camcorder. The XRs are in the U$1,400, small and is very good for what it does. Very good in low light and it's a Sony and easier to match to your FX. In particular the xr-500 is getting good press.

There are other cameras coming out this fall, but I am not going to speculate on them. Their specs seem good but until they are out and some reviews or user feedback are posted, best to stick with what is proven or known.

Lukas Siewior August 11th, 2009 07:46 AM

Thanks Mel. I was thinking about Canon's cameras. Everyone likes them for what they can do in such a small package. Plus I could use small camera for my other vids, where the big FX is simply too big.

Jeff Harper August 11th, 2009 08:15 AM

Luke, you give us no price range, but it doesn't matter because your options are quite limited anyway.

Regarding the HV30, I use a Canon HV-30 as a backup with wireless, and it is not close to the FX1000 in low light. It matches the Sony quite well under the right circumstances, but as the light drops the image deteriorates.

If you don't want a FX1000 because of the price, then you should look for a used FX1 or Z1. Unfortunately the prices on used Z1's are still too high IMO, but that would be my first choice because of the pro audio connectors.

I see the HV30 to be a backup or third camera. The FX7 would be an option, but for a similar price you could get the FX1, which is better in low light and has 1/3" chips. The chips in the FX7 are 1/4".

Choices as I see them:

Best: FX1000/Z5
Second Best: FX1 or Z1
Third Best: FX7
Fourth Best: Canon HV-30

Adam Gold August 11th, 2009 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Harper (Post 1208706)
If you don't want a FX1000 because of the price, then you should look for a used FX1 or Z1.

Jeff''s right; I was going to say the same thing. The problem with the FX1 is that it's much softer and more cinema-like than the FX1000 -- I don't think it's a good match.

The FX7 is the best match in good light, but it can't come close to the low-light of the FX1000. But if price is the issue then your options are very limited. While many people (including Jeff) just hate the low-light performance of the FX7 I think it's actually decent -- at least it has been for me (but then I shoot much different stuff than Jeff does). As both the FX7 and FX1000 are CMOS-based (although different sizes) I find they match the best. A used FX1 or a new FX7 should be about the same price -- in the $2K range.

Lukas Siewior August 11th, 2009 12:25 PM

Wow. Great suggestions guys. Thx a lot. But what about V1 model??? What's wrong with it? As far as I remember it CMOS-based too.

Adam Gold August 11th, 2009 12:47 PM

Nothing wrong with it at all -- it's a pro FX7. Same camera, with a few more bells and whistles via firmware and an external XLR box. But if you can afford one then you should get another FX1000 -- they're in the same price range. For the price of a V1 ($3350) you can buy an FX1000 ($3200) and an XLR adapter from BeachTek or JuicedLink. You'd have many of the same features as the V1 (the FX1000 is the first prosumer level cam to include things like Black Stretch and other formerly Pro features found only on cams like the V1 and Z1, at least from Sony) and you'd have the bigger chips.

When I bought my FX1000 I just bit the bullet and bought two, because I knew I'd have this matching issue.

Other random notes: Canons are great too, but they really won't match. They've been tweaked differently and make very different pictures than Sonys. Not bad, just different. And if you think the FX1000 is big, wait till you get a look at the FX1/Z1 -- they're huge by comparison.

Lukas Siewior August 11th, 2009 01:28 PM

I'm defenately focusing on used units. If I had money for new one I'd buy FX1000 without a doubt.

The FX1 seems like the most atractive in my situation. A friend of mine has one so I'll be able to play with it before the final decision.

Thx again guys :-)

Adam Gold August 11th, 2009 01:34 PM

Shameless plug: If you're interested in a used FX1 I still have two of mine for sale. Details here:

http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/private-c...condition.html

Jeff Harper August 11th, 2009 02:24 PM

Actually Adam is correct, the FX7 would be a better match in low light, and the FX1 is softer, making both problematic. I have to admit that in many situations the FX7 would be a better match.

For the ceremony only the FX7 would be better if the lighting is good, and I would probably use it down front, with the FX1000 in the rear. The FX7 is sharper from a shorter distance than would be for a long shot. The FX1000 also has a wider shot, giving you a nice wide shot from the rear as well.

Having not used an FX1 I forgot that it is soft, (I've played with a friend's camera a few times) and it would be a tough match, but you could do a lot worse.

In the end Lukas, you should try and save up for the FX1000. It may seem impossible now, but consider setting up a savings account for you new camera. Put money in it, never take it out, and before you know it you'll have your new FX1000. You don't even need the camera till next spring, so be patient and wait till you can afford what you really need would be my recommendation.

Lukas Siewior August 11th, 2009 02:56 PM

You right Jeff. I don't need camera for another 6 mths. That's plenty of time to make a wise decision on a purchase :-)

Stelios Christofides August 11th, 2009 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Harper (Post 1209821)
...Put money in it, never take it out, and before you know it you'll have your new FX1000...

and you never know, you might save enough for a Z5.

Stelios

Martyn Hull August 13th, 2009 02:45 AM

Got to pipe in here and say my HV30 is better than my FX7 in good and low light, the fact my FX7 is hardly ever used now says it all.

Jeff Harper August 13th, 2009 04:57 AM

You know Martyn, I haven't used the FX7 for so long, I could have well been mistaken when I said the FX7 is better in low light. I have not compared them side by side. I have been somewhat surprised at times with the HV30, that is for sure.

Ed Sharpe August 18th, 2009 10:58 PM

but the 1000 is just a little one in a big skin.
 
Wait... ther HD1000 Sony is just a small cam repackaged... for a less price.. find the model of the small cam the 1000 was based on and sensor and color will match.

Adam Gold August 19th, 2009 12:13 AM

Yes, except we're talking about the HDR-FX1000 here, not the HVR-HD1000U. Completely different animals.

The HD1000 has its own forum. It's a big HC7.

Ed Sharpe August 19th, 2009 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam Gold (Post 1241092)
Yes, except we're talking about the HDR-FX1000 here, not the HVR-HD1000U. Completely different animals.

The HD1000 has its own forum. It's a big HC7.

I am sorry.... as soon as I see a 1000 I assme it is as my camra is. never mind my mess up! sorry!

Alex Khachatryan November 8th, 2009 01:38 PM

But what about matching FX1000 with HVR-HD1000U?

I have the same thoughts right now. Need to decide on second camera for my Z5U and so far the closest one in under 2000 price range is HVR-HD1000U. Low light capabilities could be compensated with Sony HVL-LBPA LED Light System (arround $500), also thinking about wide angle converter lens (about $130) and it will come out to $2100 all together.

Over all this camera should perform well as a second/backup tool for ceremonies and receptions. Is there anyone who does the same with his Z5?

To me the good side about matching this cameras is that they use the same batteries and there will be no need to carry two different sets of chargers and accumulators.
The bad side is that HD1000 manual controls are touch screen based. Also it is requires additional heavy and expensive gear.

Lukas did you find the best match already or still thinking bout it? I will need to make my mind about 2nd cam by Feb. 2010. Your experience will be helpful for me too.

Lukas Siewior November 8th, 2009 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Khachatryan (Post 1444314)
Lukas did you find the best match already or still thinking bout it? I will need to make my mind about 2nd cam by Feb. 2010. Your experience will be helpful for me too.

I've been seeing used FX1000's going for mid $2k's recently - maybe even less by next year. I came to conclusion that I need another FX1000 or Z5 - I don't have time to worry about matching footage quality from both cams. I want to go "big" next season and I need a setup which will generate consistent results.

Jeff Harper November 8th, 2009 03:51 PM

I run two and a third odd camera, and I want a third FX1000 in the worst way. The Canon HV30 looks so different during the ceremony I can't stand it. You are SO correct...get the matching cam...your videos will look much better.

Tim Akin November 8th, 2009 06:31 PM

I'm with you Jeff, but I would like to add the Z5 for one reason only, the way the MRC1 recording unit attaches.

Lukas Siewior November 8th, 2009 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Akin (Post 1444413)
I'm with you Jeff, but I would like to add the Z5 for one reason only, the way the MRC1 recording unit attaches.

That would be the best. Maybe save money at the beginning and skip the recorder. Then add it as soon as customers start paying for SDE's and other cool features :-)

Adam Gold November 8th, 2009 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Khachatryan (Post 1444314)
But what about matching FX1000 with HVR-HD1000U?

Really, trust me on this, they're nothing alike, image-wise.

The best match continues to be FX7/V1. Even V1s are cheaper than FX1000s now (with the $500 rebate on a new one at B&H, they come out to $2779 with free shipping). FX7s are $1999, also with free shipping. And don't forget if you access the site via Bing, you save another 2%.

Alex Khachatryan November 9th, 2009 10:02 AM

Thank you for advices. I would love to have additional Z5. Think it would be amazing to have two similar weapons on the field. But again, adding another camera means adding wide angle lens, additional tripod, dollies, batteries, light... it is not just a cost of camcorder itself or another MRC1 (which I don't even have for my current Z5).
Anyway, Lukas is right, maybe by next year there will be some used ones out there for lower price. There is plenty time to shop around and get to know other cameras.

Adam, few weeks ago I have worked as a B camera on one set where A and B cameras were EX1's, backup was Z1 and there was one more static camera without operator just shooting from one location, and it was HD1000 (what a mess!). I asked the guy how is he going to handle editing and he replied that he doesn't care. The most important thing for him was multi camera performance. But I guess that kind of mix up may lead to a lot of hustle during the editing process.

John Beattie December 6th, 2009 09:06 PM

I use the fx1000 and the a1u and find no problem matching the footage. Naturally the a1u needs better lighting than the fx1000 but with the right settings and a little supplemental lighting it works fine.

Lukas Siewior December 6th, 2009 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Beattie (Post 1457144)
I use the fx1000 and the a1u and find no problem matching the footage. Naturally the a1u needs better lighting than the fx1000 but with the right settings and a little supplemental lighting it works fine.

That's a great news. I could pickup used a1u for less then $1500 :-)

Adam Gold December 7th, 2009 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Khachatryan (Post 1444647)
Adam, few weeks ago I have worked as a B camera on one set where A and B cameras were EX1's, backup was Z1 and there was one more static camera without operator just shooting from one location, and it was HD1000 (what a mess!). I asked the guy how is he going to handle editing and he replied that he doesn't care. The most important thing for him was multi camera performance. But I guess that kind of mix up may lead to a lot of hustle during the editing process.

It sure does. We were shooting with a mix of FX7s, FX1s and FX1000s. I finally bit the bullet, sold eight various cams (from HC3s up to FX1000s) and bought four Z5s. Now I'm all set... I think....


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:40 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network