DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Sony NXCAM NEX-FS700 CineAlta (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-nxcam-nex-fs700-cinealta/)
-   -   One Summer Evening with the FS700 (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-nxcam-nex-fs700-cinealta/508039-one-summer-evening-fs700.html)

David Heath June 27th, 2012 02:42 AM

Re: One Summer Evening with the FS700
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt Davis (Post 1738803)
Here's a controversial sideways thought about that.

1080p50 material at 28 mb - I don't think, because of the way that H.264 and AVCHD work, we can do a straight halving. The extra bitrate can be spent on looking at the (less) difference between frames.

Not controversial at all! And not just to do with H264 and AVC-HD. It's highly likely that with 1080p/25 and 1080p/50 the time difference between I frames is the same (1/2 second?) and hence the same difference between them because of movement.It follows that for 1080p/25 the GOP length is 12, for 1080p/50 it will be double that.

Since I frames need a lot more bits than difference frames, it's then easy to see that doubling the basic frame rate won't need anything like a doubling of bitrate. Practically, there's a lot more to it than that - the content differences between successive difference frames will be less (only 1/50sec apart, rather than 1/25 sec) so the coded size of each can be smaller with 50p than 25p. That will help compensate for the greater number of them.
Quote:

There are also 'jumps' in MPEG2 recording, in that the difference between 25 mbit and 35 mbit was quite extraordinary (thinking of XDCAM here).
Again, not unique to MPEG2. You need a certain minimum bitrate to get anything worthwhile at all, any increase then gets applied just to reducing deficiencies - and if they weren't that bad in the first place......

It's part and parcel of the same argumentabout the oft (mis)quoted statement about H264 offering half the bitrate of MPG2 for equivalent quality. It's true - but only at quite low bitrates. The H264 "tricks" do improve on areas where low bitrate MPEG2 shows problems. But improve the MPEG2 bitrate and there's less problems for H264 tricks to work on!

Hence H264 has big advantages or broadcast transmission and web video - less point for camera acquisition where bitrate is less of an issue.

Alister Chapman June 27th, 2012 04:14 AM

Re: One Summer Evening with the FS700
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cees van Kempen (Post 1740351)
Alister, are you sure the Hyperdeck shuttle 2 can do it? When looking at the specs I only see a normal HD-SDI input, not 3G. Don't you mean the Hyperdeck Studio?

You are correct Cees. The Shuttle 2 cannot do it. In BMD's press release they say it can, when in fact it can't.

Noah Yuan-Vogel June 27th, 2012 06:54 AM

Re: One Summer Evening with the FS700
 
To be clear, though, it sounds like we could record 240fps and still get 120fps frame decimated footage out to a non-3g recorder like the hyperdeck shuttle 2 or other device? This would be done by setting our recording format to 30p (since 60p requires 3g) and when writing out the buffer every other frame is still played out of hdmi/hd-sdi. Can someone confirm this?

Chris Medico June 27th, 2012 08:54 AM

Re: One Summer Evening with the FS700
 
As soon as my camera arrives I will test this idea.

Tim Polster June 27th, 2012 09:07 AM

Re: One Summer Evening with the FS700
 
Thanks for your input on Twixtor. Just wondering how the time limit on the FS-700 slo-mo works into a workflow with such a short burst. Making a clear choice between slo-mo or live might be difficult.

Noah Yuan-Vogel June 27th, 2012 09:54 AM

Re: One Summer Evening with the FS700
 
I think in most cases the time limit will be far more favorable to the work in post that twixtor requires. More likely you will find you rarely need up to the full limit since things you want to see in slow motion tend to happen quite quickly and you will want to keep down your buffer offload times.

Cees van Kempen June 27th, 2012 12:53 PM

Re: One Summer Evening with the FS700
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Noah Yuan-Vogel (Post 1740480)
To be clear, though, it sounds like we could record 240fps and still get 120fps frame decimated footage out to a non-3g recorder like the hyperdeck shuttle 2 or other device? This would be done by setting our recording format to 30p (since 60p requires 3g) and when writing out the buffer every other frame is still played out of hdmi/hd-sdi. Can someone confirm this?

I don't have the FS700 (yet), but Alister Chapman confirmed this on the same question when I asked it before. So the answer is yes.

Walter Brokx June 29th, 2012 10:48 AM

Re: One Summer Evening with the FS700
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Noah Yuan-Vogel (Post 1740372)
Twixtor'ed 60p:
Pro: Looks pretty good if you're shooting subjects that are interacting with low/no-detail backgrounds, allows simulation of very high overcranking
Con: Edge artifacting in most normal situations with significant motion, long render times, lots of time and tweaking required for each shot for optimal results which is still always inferior to real overcranked footage

FS700
Pro: No interpolated edge artifacts, no extra hours of plugin tweaking and rendering to get an inferior result, can playback on set to see and evaluate footage
Con: Costs more than twixtor, burst time limits


There is no replacement for actually shooting high framerates.

These are not the only reasons to shoot high framerates.
Some organic movements are very hard to interpolate; the software just doesn't know how something like different hairs of a longhaired girl running towards the camera on a windy day move.
I tried this in december: most of the time it looks weird and fake. Only in one shot it was ok.
(And not thanks to Twixtor, but the standard options in AE.)

Or how thrown water splashed as it 'explodes' on a detailed object: it just yields distorted footage. (Which can be funny... lol)

Shooting high framerates wins in my opinion as well.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:58 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network