![]() |
I had to pull the Trandscend 8 GB card in and out about four times before the cam recognized it. I tried to insert another card with IOC-9750 adapter into slot B while slot A was recording. Error message Slot A restore Media. This adapter may work better with the Sandisk cards. I do not have any to test still waiting on my (4) 32gb Sandisk SDHC cards to arrive.
Ditto Steve I'm sticking with the Kensington too. |
Hmmm...
With Sandisk Extreme III, the only issue I had with IOC was that when you switched the EX1 from camera to media player mode, you'd have to pull the IOC adapter out, then reinsert it back in - because *sometimes* the cam would not see it otherwise. |
Cards that will work with both: nanoFlash and EX (SxS alternative)
Sandisk Ultra II 15Mb/s seems to be working best as SxS alternative - but:
I would like to buy cards (about 20 to 30) that work with both: nanoFlash and EX (with Kensington-adapter) For nanoFlash http://convergent-design.com/ recommend Transcend 32GB Compact Flash Card (133X Speed) http://ec.transcendusa.com/product/I...mID=TS32GCF133 They have not tested any other cards with it. Will the Transcend 32GB Compact Flash Card (133X Speed) be o.k. as SxS replacement using with a kensington adapter? Convergent say they are the cheapest cards and "have sufficient performance for data-rates up to 100 Mbps (Long-GOP or I-Frame)." Is there anybody else who wants to buy nanoFlash and is facing the same problem: What cards to buy for BOTH? |
Thomas...
The Kensington uses SDHC cards. nanoFlash uses CF cards. Two different beasts. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Rats, I'm now cursed because I can't stop hearing 'Dem Bones' rattling around in my brain. The SD's connected to the... Compact Flash; the Compact Flash is connected to the... PCI Bus; and so on. |
Quote:
These cards are so cheap compared to the SXS just buy two sets SDHC and Compact flash and call it a day. |
SDHC cards are so cheap, they're practically disposable. If you're used to archiving projects on a hard drive, it's cheaper and easier to store and archive on SDHC cards.
|
I'm I missing something in the math?
1.5 TB hard drive is $190 Two DL-DVD (16GB) is a little over $4 How is 16GB SDHC cost per GB cheaper than either? Now if you're comparing the cost of SDHC compared to HDCAM tape maybe that's competitive. Quote:
|
What I meant was that they are cheap enough to be used for archiving, not that they're cheaper than a hard drive. . That's what I'm doing in my business; and, my customers are happy with that solution. Each customer buys their own archival media. Given the choice, most of my customers opt for SDHC over a hard drive or SxS card.
In the context of this thread, my point is that worrying about using the same flash media on nanoflash and a Kensington type card reader is rather a waste of time. Gotta love the way the internet is so argumentative. |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
I'm no longer interested in measley 32GB card solutions. Here is what I've put together.
;-) Sure takes care of the weight distribution problem. |
Ted will it work with the EX1?
|
Only if you have updated the firmware.
;-) |
Sandisk HD 16gb
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:10 PM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network