DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Sony XDCAM EX Pro Handhelds (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-xdcam-ex-pro-handhelds/)
-   -   best UV/protective filter to fit under the lens hood (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-xdcam-ex-pro-handhelds/138440-best-uv-protective-filter-fit-under-lens-hood.html)

Piotr Wozniacki May 28th, 2009 10:14 AM

The 486 must be the outermost one in the chain (I'm going to buy a 4x5.65" one for the IR problem, once a confirmed solution exists).

Max Allen May 28th, 2009 07:30 PM

The max filter depth would be the B&W f-pro I suggested in the previous reply. You can check the spec. Thicker than this would start to dig into the hood. Just make sure the hood clamping screw is loosened all the way when putting the hood on with the filter mounted. You can loosen the screw as far as it will go. It has a stop and won't come off.

I would always leave the filter on if it's of high quality, with or without mattebox, except when obviously when mounting accessories direct to the lens bayonet. The anti reflective coating will resist most glare. If I'm going for the purist image then I would conduct tests before taking it off. A cheap filter of course will cause more aberration.

Clear filters are indispensable. A bare lens doesn't cut UV when you're outdoors and it only takes one scratch or unwipeable spec to degrade your image more than any clear filter cheap or expensive ever could. Nobody has 100% control over any environment.

Good luck.

Piotr Wozniacki May 29th, 2009 12:39 AM

OK, I'm decided to go with one. Since I have no previous experience with specific brands, which of the following two would you recommend:

- Hoya UV HMC SUPER Pro1 77mm (cheaper some $30 in Poland(sic), 3mm thick, aluminium), or

- B+W 77 010 UV-Haze 1x MRC (more expensive, brass ring, heavier)

Any comments welcome.

Mike Chandler May 30th, 2009 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piotr Wozniacki (Post 1149617)
if I leave such a filter on camera permanently, would it conflict with some special filters in my matte box, like e.g. the circular polarizer?...that the main purpose is to have some protective glass on my camera lens at all times -

I've used the Tiffen circular polariser with the Tiffen Digital HT Ultra Clear and results are very clean, but I often switch the filters rather than stacking them to reduce the amount of glass. But you won't be able to keep using the lens hood with either scenario, as both filters are too thick for the hood to fit over. In fact, even just the polariser is too thick. (Anyone found a circular polariser thin enuf to use with the lens hood?)

Piotr Wozniacki May 31st, 2009 12:28 AM

You've missed my point, Mike - I want to keep the UV on the lens permanently, and use other filters in my matte box.

So, of course I'm only planning ONE filter under the stock lens hood, when shooting with the camera alone...

Piotr Wozniacki May 31st, 2009 01:28 AM

So, any advice on my choosing dilemma between:


- Hoya UV HMC SUPER Pro1 77mm (cheaper some $30 in Poland (sic !), 3mm thick, aluminium), or

- B+W 77 010 UV-Haze 1x MRC (more expensive, brass ring, heavier)

TIA.

Mike Chandler May 31st, 2009 03:11 PM

Ah, I see.
Can't help you with the filter recommends as I've only used Tiffen.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:49 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network