Anyone know what this image is suffering from?
There is horizontal banding in this video in spots.
I shot it with my EX1 at HQ 1920 x 1080 /60i and exported it to Raw DV (4:3 cropped) using Clip Browser. It is to be used in a 4:3 NTSC DV project 720 x 480 along with footage from a VX2000. Several spots have horizontal lines like the orange bedspread in this screenshot from the timeline in Vegas 4: http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y40...ech/Image1.png I tried Avi and several other conversion methods and this is the best I could get it to look. After some conversions I tried the problem looked really pronounced. Anyone know what is it from and what can I do about it? John |
Maybe my eyes have finally given up, but I can't see any horizontal lines in your jpeg. Perhaps they show up on a movie clip, if so then I would think it is the dreaded rolling shutter effect. This may be due to the stage lights being out of phase with your camera, try using 50mhz or 60mhz next time. (Page 66 of your Operating Instructions book)
|
Are the lines just to the right of the girls left arm ?
The lines there look like interlaced jaggies. Paul. |
I see what you are talking about. It's a 1/2" horizontal orange/purple/black band midway between her left elbow and the purple furniture. I had to blow it up to see it at first. The artifact looks like its from another part of the frame (from her costume) but it doesn't match the current frame so it could be from a prior frame that did not get updated. It reminds me of the effect of dirty/misaligned heads. Do you see it when you play the footage from the camera on a monitor and bypass your NLE?
BTW, is that from Rogers and Hammerstein's Cinderella? |
I had to enlarge the picture to 500% to see the lines. These are artifacts due to the downconversion of HD footage to SD. Do a search on this forum for downconverting techniques.
These only seem to appear on the red blanket (top edge) it looks like your reds are oversaturated, try reducing them in your Profile settings. I also notice your lens seems to have a lot of Chromatic abberations, maybe the colours are not registering correctly. |
Quote:
Someone else suggested that they are from interlacing. I read every post in the archives that I could find and it seems that downconversion is the biggest problem with these cameras and the most often asked question. I couldn't find a consensus. Any suggestions I may have missed regarding converting to 4:3 interlaced from HQ 1080/60i? In terms of "a lot of Chromatic abberations", that scares me. Can you describe them further? It sounds like the camera may need to go in for servicing and I need to be able to describe the problem in a little more detail to them. Do the others see this as well? Do a lot of you shoot stage productions? Thanks for the responses. Truly appreciated. John |
Quote:
The oversaturated red will show up as a "bleeding", you may have noticed this on some poorly set up TV sets, or if you use an out of gamut red on a text caption. Downconverting footage from the EX3 has also been a headache for me. At present I am using ClipBrowser to output to an AVI (720 x480) and then bringing it in on a NTSC timeline (my project is in NTSC, normally I would use PAL). This has produced very acceptable results, although not as good as I had hoped for from the EX3. I will continue to experiment after I have completed this DVD project. The Chromatic aberations shows up as a green and purple edge to the edges of objects in your footage. Look at the bottom edge of the bar that runs accross the girls dress. or go to the left edge of the frame and see the book - object edges. Given that this is an elargement from a section, I wouldn't worry too much about this. |
When delivery is expected to be 720x480 (DV), it is always reommended you shoot 720p. Downconverting from 1080 generally results in these horizontal lines/twitter. This won't help you now, but, may be something to remember in the future.
|
Quote:
If I shoot in 720p what should I do about putting progressive footage on a timeline with interlaced footage. What do you do? John |
Tuff question, John. I avoid shooting interlaced. If in a pinch, my only option would be to deinterlace before mixing. The best way to do this would be with VirtualDub and Donald Graft's deinterlace filter, IMHO.
|
Shoot 720 60p it is beautiful, and easily converted to 525 60i or 525 30p, or even 24p.
If you shoot 30p it will work well in a 60i timeline just interpret as i. I use Macs, mostly M100 but also FCP. I have never had a problem down-converting in software. I can give more specific details if you need them, but my experience is only on Macs. |
Quote:
If I shoot another musical with only the EX1 I think I will absolutely take your advice and shoot it in 720p. John |
The only 'banding' that I can see is due to DV style colour sampling issues. That's simply how DV handles colours such as red and blue and the main reason that 4:2:2 colour is preferred over 4:2:0 and 4:1:1.
|
Where does this image come from? If it's the QuickTime Player have you checked the high-quality box in presentation settings? If it's a screen grab from FCP's canvas, don't sweat it that's just a proxy.
Noah |
Quote:
Thanks Noah. John |
Quote:
John |
Quote:
Thanks for the suggestion. John |
Quote:
Great show to shoot. Lots of color. John. |
The .png in the original post was done like this:
1. Export original to .avi from Clip Browser 2. Convert to Raw DV using Procoder 3 3. Place on Vegas timeline and apply heavy sharpening in Vegas because it looked way to soft. Much softer than the footage shot with the VX2000. Note: Exporting to AVI with Clip Browser and trying to put it directly on the Vegas timeline doesn't work because Vegas won't accept the file. Here is another one: http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y40...ech/Image2.png This frame grab from the timeline was done as follows: 1. Export original to Raw DV using Clip Browser 2. Place on Vegas timeline 3. No effects applied Here is another one: http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y40...ech/Image3.png This one was done the same as the previous one except that heavy sharpening effect was applied the same way I did in the "original post". I think you can see the problem of the horizontal bands (interlacing artifacts, color fringing, or whatever you call it)on the bed pillow. I think you can see it more clearly now. What do you think? John |
Quote:
|
The most adaptable is 24p. And we are all used to seeing it, just remember the 7 second rule (anything moving across the screen should take at least 7 seconds, this applies to pans as well) or you will have a lot of jitter. All rules are made to be broken!
60p or 60i(29.97i) are also easily converted. It is all a matter of taste. I prefer fast action (sports) to be 60p or 29.97i. 24p is great for interviews scenics (slow pans) etc. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 PM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network