DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Stabilizers (Steadicam etc.) (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/stabilizers-steadicam-etc/)
-   -   Steadicam folk (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/stabilizers-steadicam-etc/12003-steadicam-folk.html)

Andrew Petrie July 13th, 2003 07:30 PM

Glidecam/Steadicam folk
 
Can anyone direct me to good online literature re: rig operation, tuning, etc... Are there any online short videos? Is there a video I can buy?

Fine-tuning this rig is very time consuming, or maybe I'm just trying too hard. It's amazing how little things (like a lens cap, or a wire, or tightening the screws that lock in your adjustments...) can throw off the balance.

In my manual it states if you run and come to a sudden stop, the rig shouldn't swing. On short runs it seems fine... longer it swings, and sometimes it'll swing and roll slightly. Perhaps I'm not shifting my body properly. Does this sound like a balance issue, or is it me? I just can't seem to get the balance dead on while it's hooked up to my body.

Ken Tanaka July 13th, 2003 08:29 PM

Andrew,
Just for clarity's sake, your signature indicates that you have a Glidecam V-16, not a Steadicam-brand rig. Correct?

Andrew Petrie July 13th, 2003 08:46 PM

Correct, but I see reference to all body-mounted rigs as steadicams these days, kinda like how Coke is synonymous with pop/soda, etc..


typical convo of late:

me - "I have a Glide Cam"
them - 'a what?...'
me - ".... it's just likea steadicam"
them - 'oooooohhhhh! COOL!'

Rob Lohman July 14th, 2003 06:01 AM

Some balancing tips and things to try to increase your skill etc.
can be found at this thread

Charles Papert July 15th, 2003 12:20 AM

Re: Glidecam/Steadicam folk
 
<<<-- Originally posted by Andrew Petrie : Can anyone direct me to good online literature re: rig operation, tuning, etc... Are there any online short videos? Is there a video I can buy?>>>

well, I've been low-profile about this, but in about 8 months you will hopefully have your wish...my lips are now sealed again.

<<Fine-tuning this rig is very time consuming, or maybe I'm just trying too hard. It's amazing how little things (like a lens cap, or a wire, or tightening the screws that lock in your adjustments...) can throw off the balance.>>

That is the nature of Steadicam. The lighter the rig, the more effect a small shift in balance will have on the rig.

<<<In my manual it states if you run and come to a sudden stop, the rig shouldn't swing. On short runs it seems fine... longer it swings, and sometimes it'll swing and roll slightly. Perhaps I'm not shifting my body properly. Does this sound like a balance issue, or is it me? I just can't seem to get the balance dead on while it's hooked up to my body. -->>>

Frankly, the manual is at odds with the laws of physics on this one. This may be true enough when the rig is balanced in a neutral state, i.e. not bottom heavy at all, so that when you turn it horizontal it won't have a tendency to drop back to vertical. However, the rig is rarely operated in this state. Given a standard 2-3 second drop time, the pendulum issue you described is an expected occurence during periods of acceleration or deceleration.

One is required to control this tendency with your operating hand. When coming to a quick stop, the bottom of the rig will want to kick out (tilting the camera back). This requires a tiny amount of resistanceto be applied to the lower part of the handle during the deceleration, then releasing it a fraction of a second later. When this occurs and how much force is a determination made by practice and experimentation.

The same thing is true of side to side acceleration, which can contribute to the rolling factor you are noticing. When moving sideways with the rig, the pendulum effect will now show up in a horizon roll. The same solution applies; reign in the forces with your operating hand (force applied to the other side of the handle may be required for quick starts as well).

Don't be surprised if this seems to take a long time to get down. Being able to compensate and control all of the forces in and around the rig takes a lot of practice. How much? I didn't feel like I was a particular skilled Steadicam operator for probably three years after I bought my first rig, and even then I still had plenty to learn. I would say that it was a good six years before I felt confident to take on just about anything that was thrown at me. Now, some fourteen years after I bought that rig (and add on four years of operating a rental rig before that, to make eighteen), I'm rarely in a position to be seriously challenged, but it can and does happen. And even the most basic of shots still requires a certain amount of attention at different points.

I only bring this up to illustrate that what you are experiencing is absolutely normal for a relative newcomer to the wonderful world of "body mounted camera stabilizers" (Steadicam IS still a registered trademark!). There may well be mechanical issues with your system, but what you described sounded like "operator error", as the saying goes.

I recommend drawing an X with a dry-erase marker in the center of your monitor, then putting an X made of tape on the far wall of a long hallway. Line the two X's up on the monitor and walk carefully down the hall, maintaining the lineup. Stop on a dime at regular intervals and observe the results (the X's should stay together, if they separate, you need to keep playing around with the above instructions). Do this at different speeds (as you have seen, it's harder when going fast) and backing up as well as walking forward. This is an excellent exercise for precision in general. When you have that down, zoom in the lens to a mid-telephoto and try it now (it will be much harder). As a treat, you can eventually zoom back wider and marvel at how much better you are at that than when you first started!

Remember, above all else, do NOT over-control the rig with your grip. White-knuckling is a bad thing! Realize that much of the time the fingers of that hand are barely making contact with the post, and any clamping needed to control the acceleration must very quickly be released to keep the rig from wobbling around.

If you find that the X is jumping all over the place, try making a run WITHOUT your hand on the post (you can keep your hand on the gimbal/arm connection, though). If the results are much better, you can thus assume that you are over-controlling the rig and you need to lighten your grip.

Hope this helps...!

Dean Sensui July 15th, 2003 02:00 PM

Charles...

Thanks for the tip on how to practice with a stabilizer rig. Matching up the x's is simple but ingeniuos.

I'll give it a try and see how it goes.

By the way, I purposely added weight to the V16's sled so that the increased mass would provide additional inertia and bring the arm's support spring to the middle of its operating tension. Makes for a smoother moving setup. I'm using an XL1s and there's not a whole lot of weight without adding plates to the top of the sled.

Dean Sensui
Base Two Productions

Andrew Petrie July 15th, 2003 08:52 PM

Thanks Charles, I can't wait to see what you've got under your sleeve! I have years of practice to get started on... Do you tour the country by any chance and offer workshops? Best to learn from a true pro!

Dean, perhaps we can share our experiences given we both have V16s and XL1s. I also use all 4 weight plates, along with the 5" LCD at the bottom with 2 rings front, and 6 rings at the back to balance. The spring tension is at it's weakest setting, and I find this over-all weight keeps the arm level.

I have the quick release plate mounted on the right side (closest to me when mounted-up on the left side of my body), and as far back as it can go. the XL1 is really front-heavy with the lenses. It's too bad Canon put the mounting hole so far back.

I currently use a long RCA cable for the monitor (the one supplied with the V16 is a joke), but I have not yet drilled into the center post to feed the wire that way. This dangling cable (even when looped) gets on my nerves, and I'm sure it may cause potential accidents later if it catches on something.

Charles Papert July 15th, 2003 10:54 PM

Andrew:

I have taught in the past at the Steadicam workshops in Rockport ME and Malibu CA, but it's been a few years. I have thought about a travelling DV version, maybe after the training video is completed (damn, I mentioned it again! Now I'll have to kill you all).

Dean:

I think your weight approach is a good one. As you have seen, more weight equals more inertia, also equals an easier time controlling the rig. And you can always remove weight for exceptionally physical or lengthy shots.

I'm not an expert on Glidecam arms, but the general theory on the Steadicam arms was that setting the tension so that the arm floated just below horizontal resulted in a smoother ride than right at horizontal. See if this works for you.

Dean Sensui July 16th, 2003 03:43 AM

Andrew...

I have two of the plates on the stage, and a Manfrotto 3270 low-profile quick release. The camera is also mounted on a 1/2" thick plexiglas plate extending from the back of the camera to the front of the lens to help stiffen the whole thing and avoid any odd vibrations.

The quick release makes it really easy to dismount the camera for handheld or shoulder-mounted shots without having to re-balance everything.

A 7" Radio Shack B/W TV is mounted at the front of the base with a 4-amp-hour gel cel battery at the back of the base. This all acts as a great counterweight with no additional plates or washers necessary to fine tune the setup.

The monitor sits on the stock monitor mount but it's not stiff enough. I'll have to make something else to support the larger TV. I should have gotten a 5" and might consider doing that later. Don't know if it's any brighter but it might be easier to position on the rig.

I used a spare coax cable to connect the camera and monitor but it's a tad bit short. Optimal placement would be right down the center of the shaft, but I'd have to drill a hole, thread the cable, and make the connections after that. If I do drill a hole I'd like to make it as small as possible to minimize weakening the sled's centerpost. With the added weight of the gel cel and TV the whole thing seems to exhibit a bit of springiness -- not good as it could induce a bit of shake in the image.

The alternative, having the cable detouring around the gimbal bearings is rather klutzy. I'm surprised Glidecam hasn't come up with a better solution.

I secure all the cables with double-sided velcro straps. Easily readjusted if necessary.

Charles... Thanks again for the tips. Having an experienced pro share info is always highly valued.

Dean Sensui
Base Two Productions

Cosmin Rotaru July 16th, 2003 05:50 AM

A training video Charles? When? Where?
You're doing it for beginers and it won't be very expensive, right? :)

Andrew Petrie July 21st, 2003 09:57 AM

Dean, do does your portable TV have a radio as well? All I can find at Radio Shacks here are clumsy looking TV/Radio combos. They do however, have the RCA video-in connector I'd need.

Could you give me some info on gel cell batteries, I've heard of them before but never come across them in person. What brand/model do you use, and was it difficult to find a wiring harness/adapter for the TV or Camera (which one does the gel cel power?)

Charles Papert July 21st, 2003 02:44 PM

Sorry Cosmin, didn't see your last post...

No details on when my training video will be done, it's one of many projects in the hopper. Pricewise, it will be under $100, and I'm looking at an interactive DVD format.

Cosmin Rotaru July 23rd, 2003 04:36 AM

Thanks for the reply Charles.
A training video would be very nice!
When it's done, talk to Charles King on homebuiltstabilizers. Maybe you make a deal with him and post an add on the site. I'm sure many of us would be happy to have that DVD.

Charles Papert July 23rd, 2003 05:17 AM

Andrew:

Have you had a chance to get in some more practice time, try out the exercise etc.?

Andrew Petrie July 23rd, 2003 09:48 AM

Charles, yes I've spent some time with it, moreso on the balancing side. I've torn it down and re-balanced the rig a few times with different combinations (16x, 3x, etc...). I'm going to get a friend to fabricate some custom parts to make the rig better accomodate the XL1.

Practice with the rig has resulted in a bit of pendulum and/or horizontal rolling, even after getting it balanced according to the manual. I keep wondering if I'm suffering from a minor gimbal flaw (like John Steel had), so it's a little frustrating (but I keep at it!), I wish the Toronto Glide Cam dealer wasn't so uptight about it's workshop requirements (must purchase GC units from them)

More practice when I get home tonight. What's your daily rate? Maybe I could buy your time up here for a day, heh.

You know what would be cool - A DVinfo Steadicam/GlideCam workshop weekend! I've got 3 weeks of vacation to use :)

Dean Sensui July 23rd, 2003 10:23 AM

"Dean, do does your portable TV have a radio as well? All I can find at Radio Shacks here are clumsy looking TV/Radio combos. They do however, have the RCA video-in connector I'd need."

Hi Andrew. I just got in from a trip. The one I got is an RCA TV, model 16-3001. It does include a radio. The 7" model is a little big, but it provides a larger viewing area, too. I tried to find one that was mostly screen up front, and that's about as good as it got, for the money I spent ($65 or so). You might take a look at the 5" model. Of course, when you compare either one to an LCD screen they're quite bulky. But the LCD screen's viewing angles are much too limited to be broadly useful for a stabilizer like the Glidecam.

Dedicated video monitors with very bright screens tend to be expensive. This is a fairly good solution for the price.

Dean Sensui
Base Two Productions

Charles Papert July 23rd, 2003 01:59 PM

<<<-- Practice with the rig has resulted in a bit of pendulum and/or horizontal rolling, even after getting it balanced according to the manual. >>>

As I described earlier, the best way to troubleshoot this issue is to perform the same shot (say, walking down a hallway) with and WITHOUT the operating hand on the handgrip. What you describe is very typical "new operator" stuff. If the version of the shot without your operating hand rolls less, that's what is going on. It's then a matter of re-introducing that hand, but being very aware of not introducing external forces onto the rig. Be aware that you should be barely touching the rig with those fingers, in fact a certain percentage of the time on actually lets go of the rig with that hand altogether. Walking at a fixed speed in a straight line will require almost no feedback from the operator's hand.

If you try this and the hands-free version has problems also, it may possibly be that you have a gimbal issue.

<<What's your daily rate? Maybe I could buy your time up here for a day, heh.

You know what would be cool - A DVinfo Steadicam/GlideCam workshop weekend! I've got 3 weeks of vacation to use :) -->>>

Now you're talking. Anyone else in??

John Steele July 23rd, 2003 05:13 PM

A workshop sounds like a great idea, count me in. Have you ever been to Scotland Charles :-)))

John.

Andrew Petrie July 23rd, 2003 06:18 PM

Knock vibration
 
I just noticed a knock vibration, felt through the handle (eminating from the gimbal) when the sled swings slightly. The knock is felt when the bottom of the sled swings up a few degrees from vertical, in any direction, and does the same once it swings in the opposite direction. A perfectly working gimbal shouldn't give any feedback, right?

I checked to make sure it wasn't the cable hitting the post, and nothing obtrusive is getting in the way, everythig is clamped down tight.

Perhaps this is the problem giving me grief? No matter how fine of a balance I get, the sled will still pendulum, roll, or twist for a bit when I stop moving.

I sent GlideCam an email, let's see what they have to say.

Charles Papert July 24th, 2003 04:22 AM

Knocking is not a good thing. It means that there is play somewhere in the gimbal assembly, and when the weight of the rig shifts, it is causing a jump within the gimbal assembly. This could certainly be affecting the operation.

There is another field test but it is not all that easy. I'm not familiar with the docking bracket for the Glidecam, but if it has a balance pin on the end of it, set the rig there. Eliminate any cables that travel between the top and the bottom of the rig. Make sure you are in good balance, then give the rig a spin (not too fast). First of all, the rig should spin for a good long time--if it comes to stop fairly quickly, you have friction in your pan bearing, which is not good.

The other goal is for the rig to spin flat, i.e. not tip in one direction or the other as it rotates (a phenomenon known as precession). If the rig is taking a consistent lean in a given direction, say 5% up when the lens is facing 12 o'clock and then 5% down at 6 o'clock, the rig is simply out of dynamic balance (you might want to check out this thread for information on this issue).

However, if the rig is performing oddly, such as leaning 5% at 12 o'clock and level at 6, this means that the gimbal is not balanced properly (the axes do not have a common center). This will also affect your operating.

John Steele: I have indeed been to Scotland a few times, not for about 8 years though. I'm a big fan.

Lorinda Norton July 24th, 2003 12:03 PM

<<<-- Originally posted by Charles Papert : Now you're talking. Anyone else in?? -->>>

I'd love to come to CA for a workshop, and even more so if you'll broaden the scope a little. I just read your post on another thread about subtle light getting into the lens, etc. So 101, but something I may never have figured out! Not to give you the big head :) but one of my folders is named "notes from Charles Papert." I appreciate your willingness to help on this forum and would gladly travel/pay for some instruction.

Charles Papert July 24th, 2003 03:10 PM

Thank you Lorinda, that's very flattering!

Anything could happen in the future...I'm just embarking on a career switch from cinematography to directing, which in all likeliness means I'll have a lot more free time than I do now (usually that's how it works). Maybe DV workshops will be something I could entertain. Stay tuned!

Andrew Petrie July 24th, 2003 03:29 PM

I'm willing to quit my day job and work with you full time Charles, whoo! Directing - Lots of fun!

Like Lorinda, I also have threads bookmarked. I'm also willing to travel. I think you have a number of eager folk here who'd come out at hear what you have to say about all kinds of things... If that's not possible, if everyone had broadband, we could have weekly/monthly real time audio conferences. I'm just so excited about learning from guys in the field, and not some college professor.

Casey Visco July 24th, 2003 03:52 PM

Andrew, I agree...It's been my personal experience that the skills you really use you pick up on the job or from people who are involved with it...most teachers tend to be too far removed...there are exceptions tho.

Andrew Petrie July 24th, 2003 08:54 PM

I don't suppose you have any insight on my gimbal kocking issue Casey? Any ideas?

Casey Visco July 24th, 2003 09:40 PM

Andrew, from what you're describing it could be a number of things...if in fact its coming from the gimbal assembly, then it could be an imperfect bearing on the yolk (doesnt sound like a problem with the pan bearing)...or perhaps a problem at the lock on the gimbal assembly...either way...something is loose...

i had another thought...it could also be in the head portion of the sled...any slippage of the plates or looseness here will likely cause a similar result...and felt through the handle.

i could pinpoint it if i had it in my hands without much trouble...but im not exactly qualified to issue a diagnosis over the net.

have you done the last field test Charles posted?

Taylor Moore January 20th, 2004 06:18 PM

Charles Course
 
Has there been any more headway with a course Charles P?

Charles Papert January 22nd, 2004 02:26 AM

Haven't thought about this course thing since this thread was active, but stay tuned...mebbe once the video is out there, this will be a logical step.

Cosmin Rotaru January 22nd, 2004 07:45 AM

So, where is the video! Where is it? WHERE IS IT CHARLES?! :)

Charles Papert January 22nd, 2004 11:53 AM

Soon, baby! Soon!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:33 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network