Nicholas de Kock |
January 10th, 2009 10:13 PM |
I own a Glidecam Smooth Shooter because I can afford one, however after using it for about a year now I want a Steadicam Pilot. The Glidecam is a good start but it has limitations, for one forget about super smooth motion on rough terrain with only one arm. You need a monitor at the bottom of your rig to be really effective, walking around with your eyes on the camera is not so great for seeing where you are going and performing turns sometimes require guess work as the camera's monitor goes from view, not to mention walking backwards become a nightmare. One of the biggest draw backs on the Smooth Shooter is the position of the handle that holds the arm and the Glidecam 4000 together, shooting at a straight angle is fine, as soon as you tilt your camera towards a higher or lower angle the handle hits the metal plate that holds your camera thus effectively limiting your up/down shooting angle, it's very annoying - the Steadicam Pilot design solves this.
If you can't afford a Steadicam the Glidecam is a notable stand in until you save up enough for a Steadicam. The value added to my production with the Smooth Shooter gives my videos that professional look however I don't have as much control as I would like - this becomes annoying as you follow a subject and the plates hits the handle ruining my shot.
|