DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Techniques for Independent Production (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/techniques-independent-production/)
-   -   On Set Comparison: 16mm FILM & HD w/35mm Adapter (uncompressed) side by side (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/techniques-independent-production/134752-set-comparison-16mm-film-hd-w-35mm-adapter-uncompressed-side-side.html)

Martyn Hull November 28th, 2008 07:11 AM

Am i right or wrong in saying the canon hv20 has more resolution than standard 16mm film,i was under the impression than for hd tv broadcasts 35mm pro hd and a small pecentage of hdv, not sure about super16 but i do not think 16mm is included.

Brian Drysdale November 28th, 2008 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martyn Hull (Post 969944)
Am i right or wrong in saying the canon hv20 has more resolution than standard 16mm film,i was under the impression than for hd tv broadcasts 35mm pro hd and a small pecentage of hdv, not sure about super16 but i do not think 16mm is included.

For the UK broadcasters Super !6 is counted as a SD format (like HDV), although this seems to be due to the transmission codec not liking the grain on the 500 ASA stock or perhaps it's just the engineering politics.

Christopher Ruffell November 28th, 2008 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martyn Hull (Post 969944)
Am i right or wrong in saying the canon hv20 has more resolution than standard 16mm film,i was under the impression than for hd tv broadcasts 35mm pro hd and a small pecentage of hdv, not sure about super16 but i do not think 16mm is included.

I doubt that the HV20 has more resolution than 16/Super16 - this was simply a real-world shoot under time-constraints and lo-no budget (there was one more person on crew other than us, the two operators). I'm sure someone could prove with a better film stock that film has more resolution that the HV20. But, then how much more, and, could the average person tell?

The HV20's image, despite being uncompressed, had a resolution lower than it's maximum; a 35mm adapter and 35mm lens loose contrast and resolution and adds chromatic aberration, the DOF was extremely shallow (50mm 1.4 lens fully wide open) and my focus was off as I was eyeballing it through a 2.5" LCD screen. Then bear in mind the optical and digital systems in the camera that throw away high-frequency detail. If the set had been any darker at all, it would have started to miss detail.

In the end, the director and I were excited that we can cut the footage together after a colour grade and some grain thrown in.

Hunter Richards November 28th, 2008 03:26 PM

I just wanted to know what stock THAT frame was from, looks like 7218 and it seems to be exposed to the specular highlights. For people who haven't seen much 16mm, this shouldn't be seen as a comparison to make any judgments on.

Anyways, thanks for posting Chris, I love frame grabs!

Christopher Ruffell November 19th, 2009 11:43 AM

Here's the video:
 

Martyn Hull November 20th, 2009 10:28 AM

nice stuff

Christopher Ruffell November 20th, 2009 12:15 PM

Glad you enjoyed it - the director will be thrilled! It was his first project of this nature. Cheers!

Martyn Hull November 24th, 2009 09:27 AM

Which parts were 16mm.

Christopher Ruffell November 24th, 2009 12:31 PM

Martyn, this project is over a year old now for me, and, it's visually hard to tell, which means that the blend of the two was a success. From what I can remember, the first shots are 16mm, many of the earlier shots from the first half of the band on the location they play at are 16mm, and all the B-Roll (B&W driving, etc shots) are 16mm too.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:54 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network