Bryce: Thanks for the vote of confidence. As I was putting the stills on the timeline, and stretching them to fill the needed length time-wise and then adding motion, it occurred to be that often they would not fully fill the frame. Your idea is as good as any, but I need to go back and watch some more Ken Burns stuff to see how he handled it.

I was troubled by the transitions too, and never could decide on the best way to do it, fade to black, cross dissolve, etc. Again I will be watching Ken's work with a more critical eye. I hoped that my "technical" audience would comment on the speed. I also need some slow pans acros the stills, but only the last picture here really lent itself to that.

I'm learning and feedback here is an important tool in that maturation process as a film maker. So, thanks... to you and again to everyone else. Also,for those reading this, you don't have to be a contestant or even a film-maker to critique what you see and offer your suggestions! I gratefully accept and consider all.

Chris Swanberg

ps. If you watch the vimeo clip, I suggest you click on the full screen button too, not JUST the HD.
pps. We should all post a short talking head clip just so we have a sense of who our fellow film-maker's are!

Chris, awesome done! I liked it very much.

Your VO is perfectly done to my ears. As a foreigner I picked almost every word on the first play, which I seldom do. Take this as a big compliment, Chris!
If I should be picky - audio level is a bit low. Also there's a change in audio, starting at the Ken Burns visuals. The VO is only in one channel, with soundtrack in the other. I think VO in both channels will be better.

Your chroma keying was perfect made too. But as mention by others, changing backdrops a couple of times or three would have been better as the sequence with the talking head was a bit long to me. Or you could have done some Ken Burns cut-ins for a few seconds.

I like your concept very much, think you have a very nice and interesting piece here. Good luck on your trip out in the wild. Hopefully you'll get the footage your after.

Hi Chris

I am not sure that I can add any more to what others have said here. I agree that you have done a very good job of narrating - you are very easy to listen to - and your handling of the photos is very polished. I am looking forward to seeing how you incorporate them into your film.

It must be pretty frustrating not being able to get out and get into something more concrete as yet but you have at least made good use of the time to do some very thorough research by the sounds of it and that will pay off in the long run I am sure.

Chris,

Not sure what else I can say that hasn't been said already.

I think you should definitely do your narration as your are obviously very good at it. You have a very clear voice and I think you come across very well. A bit more emotion wouldn't go a miss. You have done a lot of research and I look forward to seeing some great footage next time?

Great stuff.

[QUOTE=Chris Swanberg;1143674]...I was using some free teleprompter software on my computer, and I had relocated the monitor to the camera position. It's a great litle shareware product called easyprompter:
EasyPrompter - Portable Standalone Version: the best free OFFLINE teleprompter. that I first read about on this site.

Actually, it's freeware - use it as much as you like. All the features are enabled and there's never any nagging :)

Freeware with a developer intent of making it perfect.... "he" just keeps fiddling....I am making a donation, and suggest others who use it do likewise.

Now, for a full screen version <g>.

Per: Thank you for taking the time to view my submission this round. With the encouragement I have received I think maybe I WILL do the VO for the final piece. You raise some good questions about matching sound and sound levels, as I progress I will pay more attention to that. Also when possible I will try and use the same microphone set up the same way.

Marj: Thank you for your comments. In less than 2 weeks I will be able to make significant progress hopefully. I am not sure how much actual Park footage I will be able to capture. I checked the Park website today to see how they were coming on getting the road over Logan Pass plaowed out... here is what it said, with minor edits for brevity:

Road Report: May 18, 2009
Present Locations:
West Lakes Road Crew: Has completed the plowing …full width of the road surface up to the Loop; …the crew is encountering a lot of rock and tree debris on road surface with snow depths around 15'-20' in the slide areas 5'-10' out of slide areas. Cut lifts of snow down to rotary plow depth from Grouse Point to Bear Grass. Weather temperatures were between 35-40 degrees with some fog in the early hours of the shift.
Hudson Bay Road Crew: …encountering snow depths of 25 feet. No progress today because of avalanche conditions. Avalanches were sighted in the Siyeh Bend area early afternoon today.

Mother nature hasn't quite yet decided summer, or for that matter, spring, is due quite yet.

Mihali: Thanks for the vote of confidence. I have definitely taken to heart the comments regarding to a little more up beat inflection and emotion in the narration. We'll see how I do. I may in fact post something before the next submission just to garner some feedback, if the contest permits that and the participants don't mind.

Hey Chris,

Glad to see your focus on the people aspect of the park. I really think that that is a good choice, I am a firm believer in "people are interested in people" (even wildlife lovers seek out what they can learn about themselves in watching the behaviors of other species)...just my opinion. So I applaud your decision. Like I said before I am really interested in the short era of mountain men in the US and I really perked up when you started talking about and showing the images of them and the traders. I firmly believe that once you have this entire film put together that you will have a piece that will be of interest to a great many people…hopefully PBS or some other station will show interest as well.

Do you plan to use any live footage aside from the astounding intro in your film?

I think your Ken Burns effect is coming along nicely. What program are you using to do that? After Effects?

One suggestion is that you might want to enlarge the map a little more or start the zoom in earlier so we can read it. I did not watch it in HD so that may have been the problem but in sd I could not read it at all until you started to move in closer.

Looking forward to more...nice job

Jeff:

Chris is off to Montana doing looking for material. Perhaps footage may be in the works this tiem, and Chris will be going back at least one more time after this to shoot more footage. Right now there is alot snow clearing to be done in the passes where he intends to shoot....

Jeff: Thanks for your comments. I know about the awful looking graphic at the small resolution... I recommend youwatch it on vimeo, it looks good the whole time. I am PLANNING to use live footage, but at the moment am being told I need a permit and insurance, even for this contest. I am engaged in diplomacy with the very nice folks there, but while they clearly want to work with me, feel constrained by NPS rules. (ARGHHH)

Meanwhile I spent 2-1/2 very productive days with the park Archivist, a remarkable lady named Diedre Shaw. I have a little over 100 images on order. Tomorrow I will be visiting the Montana State Historical Society and State Archives.

The Park is open, but only for a short ways in, as the road through the park is not yet plowed and for whatever reason they are keeping people well away from the Going to the Sun Highway where the work is progressing (I thought it was silly not to let us part way up to a turnaround miles from where they are working). Even down low where the snow is gone, wildflowers have not yet bloomed, and the landscape is mostly grass, weeds and brush coming back to life.

As is to be expected water is running everywhere, so I spent a few hours today trying to capture water.... beautiful turquoise "glacial flour" carrying water that refracted that unbelieveable shade you often see in photographs and don't believe. From rivulets, to waterfalls to roaring rapids..I'll put something together on my return home and throw it up on Vimeo.

USGS is on site in the Park with their glacial comparison project and more or less said "If we have it it is yours"... and "how can we help?". Terrific folks. I may do the chapter on the disappearance of the glaciers and put it up early too.

So, the trip has been a bonanza for the early portion of the film, but mostly bust for any moving images of lasting impression.... I do have an hour of HDV tape though.

Chris

ps. I was not aware but Ken Burns is working on a 9 hour series on the National Parks, and was apparently there before me <sigh - me, Mr. Day late and a dollar short>.

He lives....

Chris.
Ran into the same thing with Yellowstone. $200 for a permit plus the NPS named as an additional on my liability insurance.
Ok, then the kicker was they wanted to charge me $65 an hour to have a ranger follow me around because my tripod was a "tripping hazard." Didn't matter that I was going with a bunch of professional photographers and somehow "their" tripods were not tripping hazards.

There's a bill that will allow us to only have to pay $200 a year to shoot on federal lands but it never seems to go anywhere.

Sad that you can shoot for a cover of Nat Geo magazine for free but if you roll video even for a UWOL contest it could cost you thousands!

I ended up not going to Yellowstone to shoot and lost several thousand in non-refundable fees because I couldn't afford to pay the permit fees for such a long trip.

Ok, back to your film! :)

Kevin... I actually thought of you as the nice young lady put in charge of these permitting issues at GNP HQ sweetly told me that they would waive the "location" charge - I was remembering your problems with Yellowstone. Glacier is not hostile, just feeling a little hamstrung by the NPS rules I think. The personnel were to a fault both polite and courteous.

And frankly, I can swallow the permit fees (while acknowledging the idiocy of making me pay and not a dime required from still photographer who could be standing right beside me) but in my case it is the insurance that is going to be the problem. I had priced insurance earlier this year, and was told that a few hundred dollars a day, or maybe a thousand a week or so, and $1500 to $2000 a year was probably the range I would be looking at. Since I will be shooting at various times that means an annual policy - and that is prohibitively expensive at the moment. If you know of something more reasonable for a solo videographer I'd love to know.

I backed down from a fight on the "internet" issue - fearful I could galvanize them into defending an illogical position.

Chris,

Sorry to kind of hijack your thread on the film but I guess this is kind of related to it. :)

I have a million dollar liability policy that costs me about $600 a year. I can add an additional insured anytime for $35 or when the policy renews I can do it for free.

It also covers all my gear for replacement cost as well. I can hunt it down and see who the policy is with. Not sure if being in CA makes a difference vs. Iowa.

I talked with Ken Block the head ranger at Effigy Mounds NM. The parks and monuments have great latitude in how they administer these fees. I could get a permit to film there for $50 and they could write it as a multi-year permit. They had been waiving the fees altogether but figure they better tow the line and charge a little something just to be "legit."

I don't have an issue with paying for an ANNUAL permit. But if I were to go to Yellowstone, there's $200. The Tetons would cost me another $100. Glacier will cost me another $100. If I want to go into Shoshone National Forest, there's another $100+ there.

So there's like $500 right there and if they want they can tack on monitoring fees as well.

Look at the Tetons fees....Upon approval of the application, you must present certificate of insurance and a $100 permit fee. If it is deemed that a monitor (NPS employee) is to be assigned to your project, there will be a minimum fee of $154 per monitor for the first two hours and $50 per monitor per hour thereafter. A minimum of $154 per monitor will be charged for any assignment, including the cancellation of a given project, regardless of the reason.

You could go broke pretty quickly trying to shoot on land that you're a part owner.

Saturday: June 6.

Finished at State Archives... pricey but well organized. Will have most of what I need for the 1st half.

Snowing today. Big fat flakes. Ahhh Montana.

Oh and, Kevin.... I cannot think of a better place or time to be having this discussion after reading of Bob Safay's issues. (realizing they are half a world away... but let's deal with OUR own country).

Feel free to discuss this issue here and now, it affects us all. Some may be unaware.

Might be an interesting interlude in an otherwise quiet time...

I am editing some water stuff.... maybe in a week I'll have it up.

ps. As I was leaving the State Historical Society Archives in Helena, Montana that day in the snowstorm I heard a guy say to his girlfriend.. "Montana... Bi-polar weather"... I liked that thought. That's my Montana.

pps. Kevin mail me your ins company name when you have time ?

Hi Chris.
You have some beautiful scenery there.
Your VO was fine and understandable, as I am a foreigner to the english language.
I guess there will be natural sound/background sound together with your VO and music, in the final film?
Here at UWOL I think it's best that audio is in stereo (both channels), but if your film is to be shown on TV, I'm sure they want the audio mix to be standard for television.
Anxious to see your ULF 3.

Geir Inge

Hi Chris,
How's the edit on the water stuff going, do you have it up on vimeo yet? I would love to see it when it is.
Have all the roads been cleared yet so you can get up into the park? It's really summer here in the Kootenays & filming is restricted to the hours early & late in the day. Such a magical time to be in the mountains though.
Can't wait to see some more of your film,
Bryce

Bryce... the water piece should be done in the next day or two. It's so hot here I may just stay inside the rest of today and work on it. (Nearly done with rough edit and music, will need to finish the edit, polish the soundtrack and record a VO track - this one isn't going to have any color correction, image stabilization etc... to be honest I do not plan to use any of this in the final entry, and will do a "proper" post after my return - Meryem is ok with this btw...)

I am headed back to Glacier in a week. While I will be in Montana for several weeks this time, I am not sure how my Glacier time will work with various other demands on my time while I am there. (One task is to start a layout for a small test vineyard in the family cherry orchard, another is a High school reunion..)

However I am hoping for at least 4-5 days in Glacier this trip (and an overnight in the "backcountry"). Already working on a shot list. ( My last trip after this and before the deadline will be in October - weather permitting.)

I'll let you know when the Ice and Water segment is up on Vimeo. Soon.

Chris

ps. The Going to the Sun Highway opened the 3rd week of June this year. Very late.

Bryce... sorry, but much as I tried, the process of work and getting ready for this trip prevented me from finishing the piece. I wanted the VO to be "just right" and it wasn't... so once I return mid August there will be the water piece followed by my next submission.

A double whammy.

I drove up this trip... a long 1000 mile day but I enjoyed all of it. 80 across Nevada to Highway 93, north to Twin Falls, across 84 and 86 to Pocatello and thence North via I-15 thru Idaho Falls, Dillon MT and Butte and on to Helena and my GF's home. Beautiful scope of country I witnessed. I said hello to Lorinda as I passed thru her digs, but I doubt she heard me at 75 mph with the windows rolled up.

One should treat ones self to a road trip now and then to remind them what a beautiful country we live in - something you miss at 30,000 feet.

I saw history every which way and also indescribable beauty. I imagined countless documentaries... intercontinental railroad, the California trail, the Oregon Trail, even around Dillon MT imagining Lewis and Clark and using 53 days to go from the Gates of the Rockies to what is now present day Missoula Montana, only to have the Indians (with horses) tell them it was about a 4 day ride...using a more direct route.

I have limited (very) internet access this trip and no editing capability, so I will watch with interest other's submissions for now. Meryem graciously allowed me to post a little later due to the trip and the above issues (Thank you Meryem) and so I will try even harder to make this one more polished and watchable.

Chris S.

Well... I am back amongst the internet living.... still in Montana though. Mother nature didn't seem especially interested in being filmed. I ran up to the park with some in-laws one day for a brief hike and didn't take the camera due to lack of time. I wished I had, as the weather was blowing some clouds around in some pretty spectacular patterns - but overall it was windy, dark and spitty..

Then my then GF (more later) and I hiked into a backcountry chalet. That day was foggy and rather icky, though I did get some decent stuff in the afternoon - and did manage to get some good shots of Rocky Mtn Sheep.

The hike out the following day was not a lot better weather wise, but that night in the backcountry I proposed and my "OLD" gf is my "NEW" fiance!

I made a couple day trips back up, and high wind or rain hampered me some. Nevertheless I have a few hours of stuff to work with now. I captured a nice clip of an Osprey eating a fish up in an old pine tree. I also have some real nice "after a fire" footage - amazing how fast things start to regenerate.

I will be able to start when I get home next Sunday. I'm anxious to watch other's efforts in the meanwhile.

Chris Swanberg

ps. I captured a bear this trip, which was gratifying, a moose (running away mostly), Rocky Mtn Sheep, Mountain Goats and the Osprey. Seems like not a lot for the time I was there. Lots of flowers though (weak smile) and some scenery. Each Day I was there I was either a day late location wise to capture some footage of a Griz and 2 cubs who was becoming a nuisance but presenting great photo ops for those close to her.

pps. I ended up carring about 20# of equipment, and another 20# of clothing, food, etc. I discovered how out of shape I was.

Congratulations Chris! Also, it sounds like you have some great footage to show us when you get back.

Hi Chris:

So, skipping through some of the threads I take it that you don't have a round 3 for us to view at this time? Just back with lots of footage in hand?

Congratulations though, it sounds like this is one major project you are undertaking!

Cat

Cat -

Yes and no. I was gone from July 24th until August 17th so Meryem graciously allowed me to return and put together something. It is forthcoming.

Meanwhile, from my trip up in June I did put together a small piece about winter and ice and spring's waters... and will have that up quite soon as it was mostly done and merely lacking coherent VO prior to my departure in July... but it is just a experiement in VO most of all, from this trip's footage will come my real 3rd submission.

Chris

Those reading this "blog like" thread will know I was up in Montana in June, and found my "capture new footage" efforts somewhat stymied due to late snows and road closures, though I did make major headway in my search for archival photographs of the Park's early history.

I did my best to capture some footage at that time (or as best I could within the limited availability due to road closures), and have put it together into a brief 9 minute offering here. It is not going to be included in my final film, but it does show a side of Glacier Park I hope you will find entertaining.

I was in Montana for a period in early August and captured a few hours of live footage in the Park... and have also ordered some additional archival still photos. I will be working with those and you can expect something more from me using that material. I'll try and get up some live footage from my August visit as well.

This current post was more designed to refine my VO techniques...and work on matching difficult sound levels (ambient background, foley and effects, music and VO).... but all comments and criticisms gladly accepted. ( I already started my own self criticism list and suspect it will get longer.)

Forgive my use of some stock footage in the winter-time scenes... I did not have any "personally shot" winter footage from Glacier at this time and my high Sierra winter time footage was very limited. (It was a good lesson though in weaving stock footage into a larger project.)

Chris Swanberg

ps...the vimeo HD link is here: Glacier National Park in Winter and Spring on Vimeo

pps. Anyone have any footage of wild horses in the deserts of Arizona or Nevada ? (seriously) I am working on a novel theory about the park... involving wild horses (or horses left by the Spanish in the 1500's from whence they came)

pps. Being from Montana, I had to stifle my desire to call a creek a crick. To me, they are cricks.....s'how I grew up.

Hi Chris
You have stated that you won't be including this Spring video in your final film so I won't go too much into the footage you have, other than to say that some of the water shots were really stunning. What a beautiful place!
One other thing I did notice from your exercise of including stock footage into your larger video (in case you want to do this in the future) was that your zooms and pans were noticeably faster than those in the stock footage.
Your narrating and storytelling abilities are very good. Just remember you have an international audience and that the dates for 'Thanksgiving day' and 'Labour day' are not familiar to us. Better to use months for this instead.
While I was watching I was consciously wondering how you managed to get such clear water sounds beneath the music - really well done Chris.

Marj, a belated thank you.

I am still awaiting some (a lot) of archival stuff from Glacier... seems to be a little backed up - a month overdue. :(

I am also trying to negotiate a couple interviews with Park folks and USGS folks on the phone this week, we'll see how that goes. I will be back up there 2nd week in October and hope to conduct the interviews at that time.

However, the reason for this post is to remind folks that tonight, Sunday September 27, is a 4 hour premier on the Public Broadcasting System (PBS) of Ken Burns - "National Parks - America's Greatest Idea". It will way overeclipse my meager effort on Glacier, but I think it might be a great watch for UWOL'ers and instructive for me technique-wise.

Anyway, if you might have an interest this is just a reminder.

You can visit the PBS website on it here:

http://www.pbs.org/aboutpbs/news/200...onalparks.html

Chris

Well... my Glacier pictures... extensive stills from 100 years ago or so...has still not arrived from the archivist... months overdue...

Yet, I have put together a little version of my piece on the building of the park hotels, am adding music and VO (foley will have to wait) and trying to get it posted before I head back to Montana on Friday - right before new posts are due.

I hope to add some talking head interviews and maybe some more live footage. The hotel building clip I am going to post is mostly archival (non-park sources), and more and more I feel like the lack of "live"footage" makes my selected subject less of a true video and more of a Ken Burns slideshow.

I guess the proof of it all will be in the final result.

I'll be honest..anyone who thinks hey can do one of these in their spare time in a year is only kidding themselves. I admire my compatriots in this long form challenge more and more, and I am healthy and uninjured!

The secondary aspect of this... more time and feedback for those who chose to partake in it, will be invaluable. I think the collaboration for those pursuing their films to the bitter end will be wonderful, healing, and beneficial.

I WILL have something up for this required post and the final deadline...but know that the end result that I want and can be proud of is beyond that deadline.

Chris

As I watch Ken Burn's "National Parks" endeavor, I am amazed he managed it in 5 years!

Well, I still don't have most of my needed archival images, and hence it was kind of tough to weave something together, as they are kind of the glue for most segments.

I did have some photographs of the Park's Hotels, and using those was able to weave togther a short piece about the building of the first hotel in the Park. My main focus was on my "Ken Burns effect" and I am curious how the treatment of the stills looks to others eyes. I felt like I finally got it about right. I think for this submssion that was my main desire... to finalize how I am going to treat the stills. The opening was saving space for a number of relevant stills I did not have so I apologize for the slow start. I hope the images can help make up for that.

I had already learned and again last night re-learned that you need an identical setup to use for each bit of narration. Doing it in two different places and ways just cannot be sonicly hidden... but that was not critical here, though it will be next month. I plan to make a sound booth like enclosure and set up exactly the same for ALL the final narration. I also plan to try and do the narration in one piece if I possibly can...

I leave tomorrow for my last trip back to Montana prior to the final submission, and I hope the weather and Park folks cooperate. Supposed to be under 10 degrees farenheit at night during my visit...

Anyway, regardless, I'm going to be busy between now and November 15.

So, here it is, a couple days early, let me know your thoughts (and yeah I know a dropout in a pan...saw it during the render ... arghhh) My main interest here is how I handled the stills, but solicit any and all ideas.

Audio Note: Watching Ken Burns "National Parks" I saw the need for realistic foley sound effects on occasion and tried those at the train station scene. I liked the additional mental stimulation they added. Now my sound effects library is under scrutiny. SoundSnap.com here I come ! They have a great library that I find can fill in a personally owned sound library nicely. At 5 freebies a month it is pretty cool.

Clip is at:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGVAdNM4DVE

Chris Swanberg

Chris Burns ;-)

Splendid! This is coming along nicely and the work that has gone into it is evident. I think your treatment of the stills is beautifully done and most definitely gives the Ken Burns effect to the video. The sound effects to enhance the photos adds nicely, and your footage of the actual Park itself is stunning.

My only suggestion is that the opening footage, as beautiful as it is, remains for the first 1.5 minutes of your video... which became a bit stale to me. I'm sure there is lots of eye candy for us that you can provide during this time slot, as you ultimately start doing after the 1.5 minutes.

I like how this is developing. I thought, with both of us concentrating on a National Park, we might run similar tracks.... but I never would have thought to cover the lodges in the Park. It is a very interesting take on things.

All the best Chris.

Cat

P.S. When I tried to provide the link to my video submission on Vimeo, DVInfo embedded the movie in the thread! So I took it out. Do you have any suggestions?

Hey Chris:

When I submitted a reply, I noticed that there are miscellaneous option that are toggled to be on that automatically embeds video into DVInfo. They are found in a short section just below the submit reply button. These can be toggled off if one prefers, but what a nice option to have! Way to go DVInfo!

Cat

Chris,

I enjoyed the voice over and found it informative. You opening shot seems way to bright on my computer compared to your other images, perhaps reduce gamma on it.

look forward to the final product!! In a month!!

Chris- You have really got this Pan and Scan technique down! It looks really good. That one shot towards the end with the interior of the lodge looks like a live action crane shot. Very nice. I only have one suggestion. Where you transition from a black-and -white still to a color one, try reducing the saturation of the color shot to zero and after the cut fade it up to 100%. I think it might make a smoother transition. I hope you get access to the rest of your material soon. I can’t wait to see what you do with it!

Chris,
This section looks great. I appreciate the slow movements of the "Ken Burns" . Your narration is clean and understandable for a Norwegian. I like your background sound and music. The sound of the locomotive gives the right atmosphere.
As Catherine commented, the opening mountain footage is far too long.

I am looking forward to see the whole film.

Hi Chris - very nicely done. I'm not sure how much of this particular narration you will keep but as a mini sequence the story kept my interest and attention throughout. I did find the pace a little slow, but coming from someone who has a bad habit of doing the opposite I'm not sure you need worry too much.
Your photos are really well done and with the addition of sound - really fantastic.
I am really sorry you have had to wait so long for the archive material to arrive it mst be very frustrating. I am sure it must take a long time to do those photos. Do you have your lighting set up the same for each photo or do you have to change it depending on the surface of the picture?
Here's hoping you can get at least some of the archival material included for the final submission.
Marj

Hi Chris.
I think you have a strong video, that can be sold as an documentary to a TV channel.
Like it very much and can't find much to complain about. VO is fine with relaxing tempo, and I think thats important in any docymentary video.
Just one thing, as other have pointed out, I think the opening shot is a bit too long. My suggestion is to listen to what Catherine says about this matter :)

Looking forward to the final piece.

All the best
Geir Inge

Chris, I really enjoyed the video. My one comment, and again may be due to compression is the opening shots didn't seem to follow the narration. Other than that I think you atchived your goal of having the "Ken Burns" effect by using and paning through old B&W stills and recent color stills. Waiting for the final product. Bob

Bob, Geir and all... thanks for commenting.

I was expecting my achival materials any day when the deadline approached. I added the "front end" as a placeholder and hoped I would have additional photos to add in place of all that prior to submission, but alas, I did not.

Thanks for sufferring through a terribly long, mostly "static" front piece. It was not what I had planned.

Now that I HAVE my archival stuff... I am feeling practically overwhelmed. I will have something "rough" for final, but know I have a long ways yet to go..

Looking forward to everyone's finals.

Chris