Long Highlights Format
 

Hi all - for next year I am moving away from providing a long form format in favour of a 15 - 20 minute wedding highlights film (plus full ceremony and speeches as separate chapters) as I think this will be a better viewing experience for my couples.

The problem I have is that I am so used to using a linear narrative, that this my continue into my highlights film, and yet I so like the time shifting I see in short (4 minute or so) trailers posted on this forum etc, so I suppose my question is - how is this maintained in a longer, say 20 minute, highlights film or do edits this long revert to being linear and tell the story in sequence - I'm also guessing that messing about with the order of the day would become that much harder when dealing with 3 or 4 music tracks (of different moods) requested by the client?

Your thoughts would be appreciated.

Pete

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Stopped doing short form last year Peter the client does not understand they are paying more for a harder edit which is shorter say than a hour? Try a medium format mine 40 minutes.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

I'm in the same boat, hence my recent thread. I'm thinking of giving coupes a choice of either a 40 minute linear edit or a 20 minute cinematic edit. I think the cinematic is less linear or at least those I've seen have been. It's using the readings, vows and speeches to create the narrative with the visuals in some cases to match. For example, the father of the bride speaks of the moment he walked his daughter down the aisle. Obvious footage for that. Other moments become less obvious.

My guess is you start of with an introduction, then do a little section on bridal preps. Bits and lives from the day and maybe end on the kiss after the vows. However that's just my interpretation. I think the whole point of cinematic is that it reflects the creative style of the videographer. So perhaps a more linear approach is okay.

I've got a few cinematic videos from 2 Weddings recently to try my hand at. The interest is definitely there.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

The reason I'm doing this is twofold - one is that after speaking to couples after they have had their discs delivered, they tend to show family and friends the short trailer I provide for them (about 4 minutes) and only themselves watch all the chapters - I normally have separate chapters for...

prep/pre-ceremony/ceremony/reception/couples photo-video shoot/speeches/first dance/evening reception

...which is a lot of chapters and while I'm filming some weddings where not a lot is happening I'm aware of sometimes not getting enough 'good stuff' to pack each chapter, so moving to a 'wedding film' will take some of that pressure off and also make authoring the DVD simpler and, as I said in my original post, provide a nicer and simpler viewing experience for my couples.

Also I note a good wedding film relies heavily on good audio - and I don't mean technically good - last week's was a good example of a civil ceremony (so no personal words) and speeches made of re-hashed internet jokes - when you have shown nice samples with great audio to your couples, how do you cope when you have no 'good' audio to use?

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Peter, you have to decide what the 15-25 minute wedding film is for. If it is replacing the super long form, than go ahead and keep it linear. Maybe have the rare exception for a nice attention getter at your opening. Mostly, remember this is for the couple... its their 'wedding day in 15 minutes' to steal from our Australian friend.

As for the audio, or lack of it... well, you do your best. We've all had weddings where the speeches were flat and dull, or even the B&G's audio is just not interesting. Sometimes I can help it by doing a little bit of time shifting (like, show B&G walking out to start the dance, have the snippet of speech play).. but otherwise, I just let it go. I feel I *need* to include something from those, so for the long form highlights, they stay in.

I've got an example in this thread, if you scroll down: http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/wedding-...hort-form.html

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Hi Pete

Just for interest, what is taking up the majority of your long form time. If take a pretty much "standard" wedding how long is the linear long form video ?? in minutes? Now if you take away the full ceremony and all the speeches and leave everything else ..how long would this be ?? Maybe that's what you need as not a short form but let's call it a "shorter form" bought everything except the ceremony and speeches be around your target length of 30 odd minutes??? Why not simply give them the speeches and full ceremony as another disk/usb so if they want to watch them they can.

I really cannot see the point of a 40min movie against say, a 60 minute one?? The most requested form I am asked for is a high light ... they have no idea what length a high light should be but the bottom line is the quicker the better. My high lights are usually around 10 minutes and that gets watched more than anything else ... I would much rather have 20 of her friends watch a 10 minute high light as they might be prospective brides and that's bookings for me! How many of those 20 will want to watch even a 40 minute film?? Maybe her best friend as she might feel obliged to!! I still reckon a highlight is the answer for "everyday" watching (I also have a copy in my LCD book so she takes it to work with her) and then a "chapterised" all day one so she can watch what she wants ..she will probably only watch that once anyway!!

The bottom line here is that to have the entire day in your head you need to do a full edit of the long form and then you can remember all the good bits and making the highlight is so much easier.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

The problem I find is that my videos are averaging 100 minutes. Last one was a whopping 2 hours 20 minutes. Apart from a once only viewing, will couples ever want to settle down and watch a video of that length.

To me I can see the following video choices:

A full length video between 90 and 150 minutes thats watched once, maybe twice. A video for the couple to relive their Wedding Day soon after, but likely never watched again.
A Highlights video: For the web, something to show friends and some family.
A 40 minute video: Something for the couple to enjoy on Anniversaries and/or show close family members who may wish to see more than what the Highlights offer. I could happily sit down and watch say a 40 minute video of my Parents Wedding. I might gawp at watching 2 hours with full hymns, Sermon, Gift giving in Speeches. But a 40 minute isn't a bad length. It would allow for more detail of the day - show off the Speeches more without dragging too much.
A 20 minute Cinematic edit: Replacement or addition to the 40 minute video that tries to tell the Wedding in a more creative style with voice overs a prominent feature.

I agree that when offering a shorter video, including uncut Ceremony and Speeches is a good idea or else why record them in full in the 1st place. However I'd rather they'd be tucked away as an additional Bonus video than the main video.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

All of these edits and options for couples should equal more money for the editor.

I'd never consider offering a full length, a 40 minute and a highlight.

Can you really keep 40 minutes interesting?

I doubt it.

I would say to offer two packages if you're wanting to do a feature film.

Highlight, ceremony and speeches

Highlight, feature, ceremony and speeches.

The feature would be a lot extra. To me, features work when they're packed full of great shots, b roll and continue along a speech driven format.

The American greats, as far as I am aware, taught us to deliver this style of feature. If you watch their films, they have particular chapters that they continue to revisit throughout the day, but often the speeches play over the b roll and the moments are shifted continuously. Even considering this well tried formula, sometimes the features of the greats become empty. If they're the best in the business, why would I consider beating them if they sometimes falter? Sure, every film they create is good, but it doesn't elevate to a level of brilliance every time. They'd even tell you this themselves.

Offering 20-30-40-60 whatever minute features are only possible with that much entertaining footage. If the greats are doing 10-20 minutes, why are people here considering longer than that? Are you really going to capture anyone's hearts if your film is 40 minutes long and boring? Or would you be better off cutting it down even further into 10-15 minutes? Even as a prospective client, I would want the shorter, cleaner version offered by the best in England. Even Ray Roman states that he doesn't give out a time limit. Bottom line: you should be able to entertain her friends for as long as your film plays. If not, then you should be doing a long form edit, because trying to be creative wth 40 minutes takes too much time not to be a piece that is watched by all.

Honesty, I can see a lot of wasted hours trying to piece together what is in essence, half a film. 10 minutes would often be my longest if I had broken into the business and had more clients. With this opinion, I am just challenging thoughts. I know I'm not as experienced as everyone else, but also feel quite strongly that this is the right route set out before us.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Craig, at the end of the day you set out your prices to cover the time spent. Many couples want a full length; many come to me because it is something I offer. So for me it is an essential part of my delivery process. Similarly the Highlight video isn't just a useful video to share with family and friends, but a key marketing tool. Any costs can be swayed by the fact that a single Trailer can do more than 2 grands worth of marketing.

Now as to the 40 minute video. Its not about creating a dynamic short video - thats more for the cinematic option. However not all couples share your opinions Craig on what is and isn't boring, necessary or desirable. My challenge is to provide couples with what they think they want with something that I feel they would ultimately prefer to watch. I suppose I could just give all couples a 20 minute cinematic video, uncut Ceremony and Speeches and a Highlights. Maybe one day I will, but the 30-40 minute option is there to give couples something like their full length just considerably shorter.

I currently offer a 30 minute cut down video and this does go down well. However as I spend too much time trying to create the impossible with an engaging full length 90-150 minute full length video, the 30 minute video gets very little time. Despite from what I hear it being the more watched. Hence my wish to spend more time on the shorter version than the longer version.

Ultimately Craig, as much as I admire American's greatest, my clients are mostly British. As for the right route, well I'd say the right route is one that gives you the most work, money and pleasure. So whilst a 40 minute may not appeal to you, it may find favour with others. The question is would I watch a 40 minute video of my Parents Wedding, the answer is yes. Would I want to watch 2 hours of it with full hymns etc etc, not in the slightest. 10 minute highlights is fine, but still feels like a taster video lacking some of the nuances that made the day special to the couple.

Ultimately most are giving either a longer documentary edit or a shorter Cinematic edit. I just feel there's room for a video that sits inbetween the two. Some argue that it satisfies neither, but I disagree.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Hi Steve

What on earth do you film that takes over 2 hours plus??? My wedding last Saturday admittedly was from ceremony to first dance and my VOB's were as follows :

Arrival at Church - 3 mins
Ceremony - 15 mins
Signing and Exit - 5 mins
Receiving Line - 6 mins
Stedicam shoot to music - 4 mins
Reception Entry - 3 mins
Guest comments - 4 minutes
4 speeches - 12 mins
Cake and First Dance - 6 mins

Total : 58 minutes for the long form

OK admittedly the ceremony was a civil one but in a Church total 20 minutes but even Catholic ones don't go past 30 minutes. The speeches also were quite short but at most my long form is 80 mins max!!!

My highlight video is around 8 minutes .. a bit of arrival, bride entry to the Church, just the vows and rings, shortened stedicam shoot, entry to reception, a bit of guest comments and just the toasts from each speech, cake cut and a bit of the first dance and that's all they get and they love the length as it's watchable but still gives a nice overview of the wedding. If I take out the ceremony and speeches mine drops from 58 mins to 30 minutes so I might as well leave the ceremony and speeches in.

Most of mine however do have bridal prep but that only adds another 4 minutes to the batch and working with average speeches of 5 minutes my long speeches rarely exceed 20 or 30 minutes,

I'm guessing you stay to the bitter end at weddings??? If I had to do a 30 minute short form I really don't know what I could add to the 10 minute one except the complete speeches and I'm sure her friends don't want to watch boring speeches. What would you have in your 30 minute lineup?? I'm interested??

Chris

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Hi Chris,

The shorter church Ceremonies are 35 minutes, most are 40 minutes even with some cuts during photo taking at the register signing. Catholic is around an hour and I usually leave intact. 1 hour15 minutes with communion, which I either cut or leave in depending on the couple. One Ceremony was 1 hour 45 minutes.

The Speeches on that last Wedding were 50 minutes. 12 minute Speeches are very rare, most are 30 minutes with many at 45. Some over an hour, I have several like that. So add 50 minute Speeches to 40 minute Ceremony and you have 90 minutes already. Plus there was a magician that did a special session with the couple they wanted left intact, 8 minutes and they had singers during the meal. Uncut this was 25 minutes, but I obviously did cut this by half. 2 special dances inthe evening.

I started at 8 and finished at 10. Bridal Preps plus arrival at church was 4 minutes. I have a 2 minute intro that showcases the venue and church. 4 minute piece showing the confetti, drive to Reception and Guests mingling, another 4 minutes for a photo session after the Speeches. Plus I round off with a 4 minute highlights piece. I know it seems a bit long, 4 minutes for an end of video highlights, but I cheat and use the 4 minutes Highlights video here. It gets included separately too.

Chalk it to cultural differences or maybe I just shoot a lot more, I don't know. Most videos are 100 minutes if its a church, 75-90 minutes for Civil Wedding, again dependant on Speeches.

12 minute Speeches... So envious.

For 30 minutes, its the Bridal Preps, the entrance, the vows in full, the exit, the Reception in full, Cake Cutting, 1st Dance is usually cut in half, then 4 minutes of evening footage. Just including the vows in full is 10 minutes. However part of this is me not spending enough time editing it and just slicing chunks out of the full length rather than editing the video properly.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Like Steve, I give a full length documentary video of their whole day, which becomes an important part of their family history. They come to me because they see what we offer at wedding shows and through recommendation from friends and family. Contrary to what others have found, I find that past clients tell me that their video is watched quite frequently and it is the photo album that tends to get put away and rarely looked at.

I am not even remotely interested in what the so called American 'Greats' offer, because we are in a different market in the UK and although their short cinematic masterpieces are very competent, they are a totally different product to a documentary wedding. More importantly, I don't see that their output is better than many other unknown producers, but their PR and marketing is superb, so good that they don't earn most of their money, from filming weddings, but from seminars, tutorials and selling videos and books. This gets them in the public eye, which gives them access to top paying clients, makess them recognisable and builds a big fan base of peers who feel it necessary to emulate them.

In the real world of weddings, in my opinion, 40 minute videos are a pointless in between product which cuts down on the ceremony and speeches, but is otherwise very similar to the long version. Why not just put in chapter points which enable the viewer to skip the longer bits like hymns and sermons if they want to, or long speeches where the toasts can have chapter points. That involves virtually no extra work, and time can be put into a short highlights video if your clients want one.

Roger

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Thanks for your response, Steve! I think it's a really interesting subject. It is also the same when the client asks for commercial and home use music vs commercially licensed. Someone said here that they tell their brides that they will have their own songs by choosing commercially licensed music vs a song that many people will have grown tired of in a year's time (at best). This resonated with my latest couple, who immediately started searching the Music Bed after I left.

I guess where I'm trying to hit the market is by educating the couples that this or that is the best choice, whilst still leaving it open for them to say otherwise.

I agree with what you said about your parents wedding, but then I also think a 10-15 minute highlight film would satisfy them the same - and they'd probably make everyone watch it again and be amazed by what was available in their parent's era. We'll see as the market continues to develop, but a few of my 'educated' brides - and by educated I mean the ones who have surged the Net for the best wedding films, often mention people who are doing the short form features. As more and more brides witness these films online, I believe that is what they will come to want in the end.

I also agree with Roger. Long form or feature.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Crossed over the previous two posts.

I totally agree with Steve on UK timings, even civil ceremonies are often 20-25 minutes with readings, Church as Steve has said much longer. 4 speeches at 12 mins WOW! it's rare to find the first speech as short as that and I usually assume around 30 minutes for 3 speeches, but never less than 20 minutes. Longest speeches ever for me so far were 77mins for 3 speeches, shortest ever 2mins 37 secs for 3!

Roger

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Roger part of my reasons for wanting to offer the 40 minute video is the fact my 30 minute video is the more watched after speaking to couples I've met after. I edit sections of the day to music, but this to me creates a disjointed edit where Bridal preps, Reception and Evening footage is quite fast paced but contrasted with the slower pace of uncut Ceremony and Speeches. Its like parts of my video want to be cinematic and other parts documentary.

So my thinking is to use the rough cut I make of each section which has natural audio to form a longer edit. This would create a more consistent documentary edit. However as my couples are keen to see sections edited to popular music, I use this option to create the 40 minute with cuts to Speeches, Ceremony and 1st Dance. With the sections edited to music, it currently can be very hard to achieve this, leaving as much in as possible whilst keeping it to the music provided. I had 1 Bride wanting more footage, and I ended up using 3 music tracks just for the section inbetween the Ceremony and Speeches. Natural audio would have worked better.

It is an experiment and we'll see how it goes. I agree for those offering a documentary edit, it can seem like you're cutting too much, and for those offering a cinematic edit, it can seem like leaving too much in. However the proof is in how the clients see it. Sometimes you have to dare to be different.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Craig, I plan to offer either a 20 minute Cinematic option or a 40 minute cut down video. Ultimately my clients will decide which one they prefer. I shall include a sample of each and let them choose. They'll all be educated on the difference. Personally if enough choose the cinematic I'll make that the default, but I'm not ready to just jump to that as an only option. I have plenty of bookings for next year based on what I currently offer, so I need to sound them out. Offering a long documentary edit with natural audio and a 40 minute video to music is close enough to satisfy them I hope I'm not lowering my service.

Over the next few years I hope to change how and what I deliver, but educating clients alas takes time. If I was starting out now knowing what I know, it would be different. However I get loads of bookings from friends of couples I've filmed. They've seen what I offer and want the same. So swinging them to something new I feel should be taken in steps not giant leaps.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Ok, guys ..time to move down under!! Our longest ceremonies are Catholic and run about 20 minutes without full mass and about 45 minutes if they have the works!! Speech givers are told to keep their speeches down to 5 minutes so a long speech will occur now and again ..my record is 33 minutes for a Father of the Bride ..he documented his 33 year old daughters life year by year but on average most speeches either run around 4 minutes for short ones up to 8 minutes if the B&G have to present parents with gifts and suchlike.

Just to make you truly envious my record shortest ceremony was 6 minutes 30 seconds and that was from the bride walking from the limo up to the end of register signing. We quite often get super short speeches where someone will walk up to a lectern ...say "Thanks for coming" and go and sit down ...30 seconds of footage including walk up and walk back!! Quite often with 100 guests or more filming the receiving line (we just call it congratulations) can be longer than the ceremony!!!

I don't think I would like to film a UK wedding at all!! We never have hymns here at weddings!!!

However maybe that clears up why your high lights need to be a bit longer but even with Catholic ceremonies I only put the vows and rings in the high light clip!

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Sounds like the best option!!! I just wrote my post to give my view to see how people would challenge it. It's great to hear different sides from people who have different experience levels, business prospectives, and offerings and reasons to have to stay x or y.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

I agree, in the end my ego doesn't pay the bills. Maybe I should be trying to become the Michael Jordan of cinematographers, but my first goal is to provide the footage my client wants (or their parents) the folks paying the bill. It's a balancing act and requires communication with my clients, such as, the questionnaire I send out after the wedding asking for must keep footage, after that, everything else is on the chopping block. I used to leave a lot in, now I try to keep my linear format moving along.

A year ago, I had one bride complain that I left too much in, and after many conversations, I think she thought I provided a 15 minute cinematic edit, but that's only been one time. And Chris H, as for catholic, methodist, episcopalian, presbyterian etc weddings, I always ask if the clients wants the mass left in, and they always do. As for my final product, on my typical wedding, it's two DVDs around 2 hours with a 10 minute highlight. Around here, I seem to hit the ideal spot with my clients since they have the ceremony reception as well as a shorty that they can show their friends. I imagine if I was in NY, California or somewhere else, I might get more of a movie type request.

As mentioned, I think a lot of the market is geographical or cultural in nature.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Hi Steven

Absolutely! It's not what we want or what is easiest for us to do but what the bride wants and if she expects a 2 hour movie on DVD and you present her a 10 minute cinematic highlight only she isn't exactly going to be happy. Maybe to keep all your brides happy you DO need to make a three part set ...short to keep some brides happy, medium to keep others happy and the whole day for brides that tell you don't miss a thing. I think we also need to realise that some brides might need a specific delivery type targeted to a specific group so in the end often doing just one type of delivery ...even if the bride agrees at the time to "just a 30 minute short form" she may think later .."Gosh I wish I had got the whole day done on DVD" and this might influence her in recommending you to friends rather than suggesting someone who gives a 10 minute, 30 minute and 120 minute package!!

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

This may come as a shock to some Videographers, but there are plenty of Brides not living in America that feel a long 90-120 minute video is boring and not worth their money. Companies like Shoot It Yourself offer only a 30 minute video. I'm sure some here like to think the couples who hire them regret their decision later, but that's a conceit not a fact. I'd wager most are happy.

7 of my bookings this year are for Marryoke only. No amount of pursuasion by me will convince them to have their Wedding properly recorded, quoting in most cases they dont want a long boring video. 1 turned down a free 4 minute highlight that I offer with every Marryoke. 3 I know would have gone for a cinematic had I one to market at the time of booking.

Recently for the first time since I started my business, 2 Brides having booked me and researching various online videos asked me to give them a cinematic video instead despite my package being to the contrary. I could have refused but to be honest my style is heading that way. I filmed their Weddings respectively in July and August and will be tackling this new form of video for the 1st time shortly. It's certainly hastened my decision to push my service in new directions.

Now I'm not saying a long video isn't desired by many. I plan to keep one in my package for years to come, but offering a shorter video isn't a Videographers ego nor a case of not giving the Bride what she wants. It's giving them a choice. Just as styles differ in Photographers, so should there be in Videographers.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

I too sell a highlight video and long format. Creating a longer highlight film would be nice, but for me, it would take some time. I can usually edit the hightlight film the next day and have the rest of the long version done in a few days. I am looking for an alternative like you guys, but those films take a lot of work to produce and I feel I can deliver a short hightlight film and the long format in less time than it would take to edit the 20 minute cinematic film. Plus you have to rely heavily on content. I shoot most of my content with my wife helping me out for some extra safe shots. I am all about streamlining the process cause I feel your pain dealing with reception, ceremony, speeches, as chapters. But honestly for me this works due to how fast I can crank them out. I started a new thread about selling just a highlight film 3-5 minutes and selling the raw footage.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

I'm not surprised, but think that is more due to the footage than anything else. A couple of years ago I edited a wedding for a couple who had friends doing all the filming because it was cheaper than hiring a professional. They brought it to me because they said it was unwatchable and they didn't mind within reason what it cost. There was nearly 3 hours of totally amateur footage, most out of focus, or severe movement blur and I spent 3 days trying to put together any useable footage. It ended up 20 minutes long with me having to lift stills at some points because some vital parts only had perhaps 1-2 seconds of useable footage. It cost them almost as much as it would have done to have booked me to film it, but at least they were finally satisfied with the result.

Roger

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Agreed. The point was more to support the view that for some couples, a long video is the last thing they want and that something like a 30 minute video can be considered sufficient if marketed properly as Shoot it Yourself have clearly done.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Hi Steve

You mentioned a while back that some UK speeches go on and on so I'm assuming that your 30 minute movie would exclude a full ceremony and exclude speeches or have them drastically cut down???

So assuming I'm right on the above would they get an edited ceremony? sorta entry, vows, rings, signing and exit??? and what would you do about speeches when FOB drones on for 30 minutes?? On my highlight I just include the toast at the end of each speech but my high light is only 10 minutes so I have no option.

I would be interested in how you would allocate bits of the wedding day into a 30 minute highlight?? What sort of time would you assign to the highlight from each event during the whole wedding??

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

I currently offer a 30 minute cut down video and that is just entrance, vows and exit for Ceremony, no Speeches, and minor to major edits to the rest. When I've been asked to give priority to the 30 minute video by couples, I have included roughly 2 minutes of each Speech. So for the Groom, his address to his wife, Best Man - the best jokes if there are any, Father of the Bride - something nice about his daughter.

I've yet to fully decide what I will or will not include in the 40 minute video. When the season is over I shall take a Civil and Church Wedding filmed this year and create a 40 minute video each to market. I'm thinking for the Ceremony to include the readings, not all of it, but sections of each one, bit more of the address to the Bride and Groom, a little of the Sermon, maybe the chorus of one of the hymns for variety. Other sections of the day would be more edited than the current 30 minute video I produce, only because it will be edited for the shorter video in mind rather than the longer one.

As for the Speeches, I'd expect 2-3 minutes per person is sufficient. If you cut out the thank you's and the waffle. Last Wedding I did, I paid attention to timings and was amazed how much waffle there is in Speeches - Best Man thanking the Bridesmaids after the Groom has done the same, the ums and arrs, losing their place. You can shave off quite a bit just by tightening it up.

How this will all mean in keeping to a certain length is something I'll discover in time. I think it would end up being different for each Wedding, but these are details to play with over the winter months when Weddings are light and I have time to experiment.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

How do you edit these different lengths Steve? Do you run all the footage in real time and make a note of minutes and seconds into each clip as you go, or when you find a clip that you want to use do you cut and paste it into a different folder for the different versions?

If I am occasionally also asked for a highlights video, I just go through the full edit file and delete the bits I don't want for the highlights, so just wondered how you work.

Roger

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Trailers are just random shots I grab from a quick run through of the footage. For the long edit, I begin with a more detailed look at the footage, which is brought down into its own timeline and then edited in sections like Bridal Preps, Reception, Evening Footage. I then create a new timeline for the full length video and bring each section in, combining them all into one. With the Ceremony, I have highlighted sections to be removed in a different colour label, like the bit of photo taking after the signing of the register, so I can quickly delete.

Then for the 30 minute, I simply copy the full length timeline and start deleting sections, like the Speeches, half of the 1st Dance and most of the Ceremony except the opening and exit and the vows. Simple really, takes no time. When more is asked of the 30 minute, I will re-edit the sections on Bridal Preps, Reception and Evening footage. Plus put in say 1- 2 minutes of each of the Speeches.

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

Thanks for that Steve, sounds like we work in a similar way although all my footage is imported into the timeline in linear form, with B & C cameras plus audio recorders put on parallel tracks in approximately the right positions for synching up when I get to them.

Any shorter version would be the same as you, just cutting down the timeline.

Roger

Re: Long Highlights Format
 

I don't mind doing a long form because as I'm doing it I can make a note of what I will be using in the high light video so that gets done quite quickly instead of searching thru mountains of footage!!