Matt Trubac |
March 7th, 2006 10:05 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Moreau
I really liked the overhead shot of the table and a couple shots of the disco ball were framed really well. I also liked how you tried to fit in some fast cuts in a slightly slower song, but only in certaain parts - I think that gave it more of a unique look. Overall I noticed quite a bit of shake in some of your moving shots (were they hand held?) and a lot of half zoom either starting at the beginning and ending half way through or vice versa. It also looked like the song was too long for the content as there were a lot of cake shots, as an example. As a suggestion, it can be nice to add the highlights of one speech to a clip like this as a voice over and occasionally cut back to the podium. I was also surprised at how bright the footage looks considering your position on lighting and the cameras your using- I thought that was very well done.
Patrick
|
Thanks, I tried to break up the cake shots as much as possible. All shots were handheld or on a monopod. Practically everything I shoot myself is handheld, except for the ceremony (tripod) and the high shots where the camera is on a monopod.
The lift off the table was a monopod. I have since purchased the legs for the manfrotto monopod that Glen talks about. They help stabilize things like the overhead table shot. I would like to purchase a glidecam but I'm still paying for my PowerMac, PowerBook, and Final Cut Studio. :-/
As far as lights at the reception. I try to use the DJ's lights as much to my advantage as possible. Just choosing the right angle can make a huge difference when trying to use the available light. I do have a frezzi mini-fill dimmer (50w) that I use at most receptions. I put the frezzi softbox on and it does a pretty nice job.
Don't get me wrong on lighting. It is the most important thing to good video or film (apart from good audio but I consider that separately). Shooting without light would be like painting without paint. My view on lighting is to be as resourceful as possible with what is there.. before I start interfering with the ambience of the event.
The DVX is great. It is a very capable camera for so many applications and I do miss having them. I now have a PD170 and VX2100. The gain in light sensitivity is a big plus, but I miss the convenience of the controls on the DVX. My next camera change will be to an HD format but I don't see myself taking this leap for at least a year.
|