DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Wedding / Event Videography Techniques (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/wedding-event-videography-techniques/)
-   -   What I hate when filming a wedding! (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/wedding-event-videography-techniques/77914-what-i-hate-when-filming-wedding.html)

Marco Dias November 16th, 2006 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard Zlam
To me, most priests are bipolar. They have a fake kindness and then show their evil controlling side in a flash.

I totally agree, 1 Corinthians 13:4 says: "Love is patient, love is kind..."
I think Priests should go study and practice what they read. I know it's a job, but give us a break.

Regards.

Jason Robinson November 16th, 2006 01:05 PM

Grrrr
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Glen Elliott
I'd rather them walk by and act like I wasn't there than to try and duck as they passed through the frame. I sometimes like shots that have people walking through the foreground. It can also be used as a cool visual transition when paired with a well timed wipe.

Photographer did that on my last shoot and totally screwed up a shot of bride and father walking down isle. I'm trying to figure out how to solve the scene.... either leave in the photo walkign in front of the couple, or cut a few times to eliminate him from the scene.

jason

Richard Zlamany November 16th, 2006 01:38 PM

I know the experiance, Jason Robinson.

What gets me about photographers is sometimes they never get in your way at all and are great to work with.

Other times, it is the opposite and they cross through the frame as if oblivious to the videographer.

One thing that really gets me is photographers that shoot right next to me with digital cameras that have sound effects that sound like loud film cameras.

Can't they turn that Bull$#&@ off? I hate hearing that sound and I think it is on for no reason at all.

Or how about photographers that wander aimlessly during the parent dances looking at the photos they just shot. It looks ridiculous.

Mike Teutsch November 16th, 2006 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard Zlam

One thing that really gets me is photographers that shoot right next to me with digital cameras that have sound effects that sound like loud film cameras.

Can't they turn that Bull$#&@ off? I hate hearing that sound and I think it is on for no reason at all.

I thought the same thing, and was ready to look for a way to shut mine off, when I realized that it sounds the same because it is the same. The shutter, or should I say the reflex system is the same, and therefore makes the same sound. SLR's have to move the mirror out of the way, just like film cameras do.

Mike

Jason Robinson November 16th, 2006 04:58 PM

yep
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Teutsch
I thought the same thing, and was ready to look for a way to shut mine off, when I realized that it sounds the same because it is the same. The shutter, or should I say the reflex system is the same, and therefore makes the same sound. SLR's have to move the mirror out of the way, just like film cameras do.

Mike

My partner (only in business mind you) got a Canon D20 this spring and it has a noticable "slap" because of the shutter. I actually don't mind the noise because many times I am not using the audio from busy scenes (bad audio) but other times (like for the kiss) it adds to the memories because that is what the kiss is about. The ONE scene that you have to have from the entire wedding. The ONE shot you have to get. And lots of other people are holding up cameras from their seats getting their own shots (or trying).

jason

Richard Zlamany November 16th, 2006 06:07 PM

Oh, foolish me. I thought they could turn off. Thanks for the info, Mike.
I feel better already.

Michael Pulcinella November 28th, 2006 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michelle Lewis
I hate when they want the lights off during the reception, then complain when the video is too dark. And then not upgrade their package to accomodate the extra editing. I believe a lot of brides watch these shows like Platinum Weddings and Bridezillas and don't realize how much lighting it takes to get those images.

AMEN! I was told not to bring my lights by the manager of the hall. He said he would turn up the lights for me whenever I needed it. Well, his definition of "turning up the lights" and mine were completely different and we fought about it all night!

Steven Davis November 28th, 2006 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Pulcinella
AMEN! I was told not to bring my lights by the manager of the hall. He said he would turn up the lights for me whenever I needed it. Well, his definition of "turning up the lights" and mine were completely different and we fought about it all night!

I had someone turn the lights off on me, so I just turned mine on. Even though it was only a 20 watt on camera light, if I had not had it, I would have been in trouble. My main cam was fine, the secondary roaming cam was grainy. I had enough to work with, eventually we just kept the roamer near the cam with the light.

Marco Dias November 28th, 2006 04:40 PM

Okay, I know this isn’t a wedding, but this weekend I filmed a 1st Holy Communion. When the catechism teacher first phoned me to book me for this function, I clearly told
her that I would film the event only if the priest was okay with me walking around and filming the event. She said he was a cool priest, boy, was she wrong.

When I first arrived at the church on Sunday, the priest told me that when he was doing the readings, I should not move around but stick to one corner where he clearly pointed it out to me. Fine, I understood that very clearly.

So after the readings, I started to move around to get better shots of the kids singing. That’s when I got a tap on the shoulder by the priest and told to move to my corner. I thought I misunderstood him. When the kids came up to read, again I moved closer to get a better shot and again I was told to go to my little corner. This happened in front of the whole church. The parents who where paying for their kid’s Holy Communion DVD saw the whole thing. This happened 3 times. I eventually gave up and stuck to my corner.
The photographer was 45 minutes late and when he finally arrived he was told the same thing, he eventually left half way, because he got so fed up with the priest. I never saw him again. I don’t think these parents have any photos of the event.

I filmed from one spot only, which makes the video so boring. I didn’t use 2 cameras, because the price that I am charging for each DVD isn’t worth it. I totally blame the teacher, when I deliver the DVDs I am going to tell her to explain to the parents as to why there’s no close ups of their children and why the video is so boring.
I am so ashamed of this project, that I am not even going to put my name on it. How selfish can this priest get. This happens only once in the child’s life and this priest decides to ruin it.

Anyway, that’s the story of my weekend. I thought I would share that with you and get it off my chest.

Regards…

Richard Zlamany November 28th, 2006 10:23 PM

Most priests stink. I can totally relate. I did a baptism that was just the opposite. It was one of my 1st gigs and the priest let me go everywhere.
Then I did a wedding and they fed me like a king with a table and gave out all the courses.

I had no idea the exact opposite could happen. Priests could be jerks and some reception halls don't even offer a chair or a glass of water.

At 1st this really got to me. But now I just let it all go. If the priests restricts me, I move around a bunch at communion to get the shots I need. If the reception hall doesn't feed me I bring a cooler with beer and a foot long blimpie sub.

If photographer keeps getting in the way I step up onto a 3 step ladder.

I don't know what I would have done with the priest you had to deal with.
Maybe multiple cams would have made things better.

What a shame.

Peter Jefferson November 28th, 2006 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Pulcinella
AMEN! I was told not to bring my lights by the manager of the hall. He said he would turn up the lights for me whenever I needed it. Well, his definition of "turning up the lights" and mine were completely different and we fought about it all night!

DONT ever let anyone and i mean ANYONE tell you how to do your job

sometimes they say this kinda thing so you dont ruin THEIR ambience, and all teh while they have NO INTENTION of accomodating your needs...

i have to say though, 100% of venues i shoot at love me, so i usualy get my way, but i always ALWAYS bring lights

Another thing, with a light, a decent 75w spotty with diffusion works a treat when spotlighting a dancing couple or a lectern during speaches. Makes for a more formalised and "wow factor" ish kinda scene. Alot of teh time we forget how what we do affects the entire scene, and sometimes, (bout90%) a decent spot can make things jsut that much better...

Garrison Hayes November 28th, 2006 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Hardwick
Yes, I've had all these things happen but even so, filming a wedding day is a very happy experience I find. The guests are dressed up to the nines and looking their best, there's cameras everywhere so I fit in ok, people want to be photographed and it's even legal for me to film the happy kids without written parental permission. Wow!

tom.

I can appreciate Tom's post...it's Almost a Slightly Testoterone Laced Piece of Paula Abdul... Besides! Thats my Grandma you're talkin about with the Candid Camera thing!!!

Watch Yourself...

(lol / J/K)

G. Hayes

Michael Pulcinella November 29th, 2006 12:03 PM

Good priest, bad lights
 
I must say that for the same wedding that I had the fight with the hall manager about lights I also had the COOLEST priest ever! He understood what I was doing and allowed me and my second camera full access everywhere except right up there on the altar. So, they're not ALL bad. (He was young, maybe that had something to do with it.)

More about lights...

I find that it is the GUESTS who object the most to added lighting. I got a chorus of boos when I turned on my big lights at the first wedding I ever did. That was a sucky feeling! I haven't used my lights at a reception since then. However that first gig has some of the best wedding footage I've shot. It's beautiful! And the bride loved the way it looked.

It breaks my heart to have to struggle with dim halls when I know how good it can look if they just let me light it cinematically. But I guess that'll never happen because it is the event which takes precedence, not the video.

Steven Davis November 29th, 2006 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Jefferson

Another thing, with a light, a decent 75w spotty with diffusion works a treat when spotlighting a dancing couple or a lectern during speaches. .

Hey Peter, is that on your cam, like a photogs softbox? You have pics you can email me?

Denis Danatzko December 4th, 2006 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard Zlam
...Then I did a wedding and they fed me like a king with a table and gave out all the courses.

... and some reception halls don't even offer a chair or a glass of water.

...If the reception hall doesn't feed me I bring a cooler with beer and a foot long blimpie sub.

I've only shot weddings as an invited guest for family, so I've always had a seat, drinks, and a meal. But, with ALL the weddings I've either shot, or been involved with otherwise, e.g. siblings, close friends, etc., it was always the responsibility of whoever was paying for the festivities to include the videographer(s) and photographer among the number of guests. That way, the "banquet hall" gets paid for the meal, and the banquet manager can have all that covered. I can't recall a weddng I've attended (even those for mere "associates" from where me or my spouse were working at the time) where the "hired help" didn't have their own table off to the side and out of the way.

I'm willing to shoot ceremonies, but it's horror stories such as some in this thread that make me want to avoid shooting wedding receptions altogether.

Leo Pepingco December 4th, 2006 08:42 PM

Photographers + God Complex = The most annoying thing in the whole friggin world.

why is it that Photographers "forget" you are there when THEY start taking photos.

I hate it when they get in your way, take the photo, then THEY DONT MOVE AWAY!!!! They stand there, waiting for another shot.

My favorite time in a wedding was when the Bride asked me to do a dolly shot of the whole family standing in a line and I track across all of them very carefully WITH MY TRACKS ON THE GROUND. About 3 meters away from them. (thats about 10 feet)

THEN!!! Because I said it was ok for family and the photogs to take pictures behind me (since it would add to the nice flash effect) the photog walks between me and the family and stats clicking away. When I get it done, the photog moves away, then I ask if I can do another track. The Bride says yes, then gets one of her scarves, or veils, then ties them across the seats/pews, and asks everyone with a camera to stand behind it. The Photog was the only one on the wrong side.

The Bride gave me a smile with her eyes closed and I swear I knew she'd make a great mother.

Peter Jefferson December 4th, 2006 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven Davis
Hey Peter, is that on your cam, like a photogs softbox? You have pics you can email me?

This is on the tripoded cam... about 9 feet in the air (i can hardly reach it and im a lil over 6ft)

the seconda handheld cam doesnt need light as this spotty is sufficient to cover the dancefloor and can also cover teh speeached from abotu 10 to 15 metres away and still illuminate it enough, without buring peoples corneas...

i dunno if i have a pic.. lol

Peter Jefferson December 4th, 2006 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leo Pepingco
Photographers + God Complex = The most annoying thing in the whole friggin world.

why is it that Photographers "forget" you are there when THEY start taking photos.

I hate it when they get in your way, take the photo, then THEY DONT MOVE AWAY!!!! They stand there, waiting for another shot.

My favorite time in a wedding was when the Bride asked me to do a dolly shot of the whole family standing in a line and I track across all of them very carefully WITH MY TRACKS ON THE GROUND. About 3 meters away from them. (thats about 10 feet)

THEN!!! Because I said it was ok for family and the photogs to take pictures behind me (since it would add to the nice flash effect) the photog walks between me and the family and stats clicking away. When I get it done, the photog moves away, then I ask if I can do another track. The Bride says yes, then gets one of her scarves, or veils, then ties them across the seats/pews, and asks everyone with a camera to stand behind it. The Photog was the only one on the wrong side.

The Bride gave me a smile with her eyes closed and I swear I knew she'd make a great mother.

Leo my friend, i tell you mate, how many times has this happened it isnt funny.. at first i used to brush it off, but now.. im a bit of a prick when i have to be but as polite as i am to them, and with the level of "outward" respct i have for them, they usually end up making themselves look like fools as all you want to do is yoru job and theyre obliviious ...

to Answer yoru question..

"why is it that Photographers "forget" you are there when THEY start taking photos."
Well the reason is simple, they really DO forget your there.. here in Aus, of the photogs i am chums with, they all tell me that of teh 60 to 70 od wedings they do a year, that only 20% woul dhave a video.. so most of the time, these guys arent accustomed to considering other people.. its a sad but true fact... thing is, this ssort of thing is quite common and the wrost thign about it, is that here in aus, for the last 6 years, ive seen no improvement

One thing though, is that its usually the higher end photogs who do this, as usually theyre blowing couple's budgets on the outset. But those high end clients that can afford a high end photo and video, is usualy when stuff like this happens..

Marco Dias February 18th, 2007 04:46 PM

Okay, I know this is not a wedding, but today I filmed a Greek baptism with twin girls. The problem was that both of them cried through out the whole service. They just won’t stop crying. The problem is that you can’t hardly hear a word the priest is saying. Even the priest was getting irritated. I walked out of that service with a headache.

The other problem was the photographer. He kept moving around and every time he came past my tripod he would bump it with his foot by mistake. Then he would apologize. The problem was that my microphone picked up his apology several times, because he bumped my tripod a couple of times.

Oh yes, almost forgot! Today I was seated at the kiddie’s table, which is fine with me. Except I was asked 101 questions by these kids about my camcorder, which got to be irritating after awhile.


Regards…

Peter Jefferson February 18th, 2007 05:00 PM

" Greek baptism with twin girls. The problem was that both of them cried through out the whole service. They just won’t stop crying. The problem is that you can’t hardly hear a word the priest is saying. Even the priest was getting irritated. I walked out of that service with a headache."

This is the beautiful thing about weddings.. lol after a year or two, u get a callback to shoot the christenings. i do TONNES of these a year and theyre pretty basic, BUT the cry factor is one of the biggest "problems"
With Greek/Orthodox ministers, they were heavy ( i MEAN heavy) robes with no "easy access" pockets
so laving the minister is a no go, BUT if they cry they cry, it cant be helped... and the parents will understand

I found that the biggest issue causing the crying is the minister as the child isnt used to someone all dressed up in this way, and to have them stand in front of them for half an hour chanting.

Theres also the issue of the actual act of baptism, being the cutting of the hair and the dunking itself.. unlike catholic wher spray of water on the head is enough, the Ortho's dunk the whole child from head to toe into the water. and its not the warmest by the time they get there either..

Brian Farris February 18th, 2007 07:45 PM

Doing weddings in the southeast is great. You don't have to worry about if they're gonna feed you or whatever, because southern tradition says "southern hospitality and lots of food". Usually we don't even have to say anything at the reception, they're just like, "Feel free to grab anything".

Marco Dias February 19th, 2007 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Jefferson
With Greek/Orthodox ministers, they wear heavy ( i MEAN heavy) robes with no "easy access" pockets
so laving the minister is a no go, BUT if they cry they cry, it cant be helped...

That's true, I don't even bother asking the priest to use a wireless mic, they refuse to wear one. Besides they have a wireless mic connected to their PA system already, which I can't touch either. I just use a shotgun mic.

The parents will understand, it's bad enough to hear one baby crying, but two at the same time is really irritating.

It's also true that, when you have filmed the couple's wedding and did a good job, you get a phone call 3 years down the line to film their baby's Christening. That's a compliment. But if I start filming their children's 21st Birthday, then I know I am getting old...

Regards...

Jon Omiatek March 1st, 2007 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michelle Lewis (Post 560687)
I was on a wedding planner's list, where a bunch of them were instructing other planners not to feed vendors, because they are not guests, for the exception of the DJ. I had to inform them that the DJ is there only half-day, while the video/photo people have been there an entire day, covering the event without a meal and it would look very cheap on the bride's part to have everyone eating while the rest of us twiddle our thumbs. Some of them got how rude it is not to feed us or provide a chair, but the majority of the wedding planners said if there should be food bring out a bologna sandwich and an apple in a brown bag and let them eat it. Talk about tacky?

I recommend that you put it in your contract. My contract states that if coverage starts prior to 5pm, a meal must be provided or a $100 per videographer fee will be assessed. They must sign the contract and initial this part. Since I added this to my contract I have only had one B&G pay the no-dinner clause. Secondly, most weddings have empty seats since people do not show for whatever reason, we just find a seat.

Mark Morikawa March 1st, 2007 01:16 PM

my biggest pet peeve is when they feed us vendors different, cheaper food than the guests. in hawaii.. that's very poor manners. when i get married... i'm gonna make sure my vendors are treated better than guests!

Marco Dias March 1st, 2007 02:49 PM

Reading all these posts, I've come to the conclusion that the 3 main problems for a Videographer filming a wedding/Event are:

1. Low light situations

2. Photographers

3. Not being offered a meal

Am I correct in saying this?

Regards.

Marco Dias

Steven Davis March 1st, 2007 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marco Dias (Post 634204)
Reading all these posts, I've come to the conclusion that the 3 main problems for a Videographer filming a wedding/Event are:

1. Low light situations

2. Photographers

3. Not being offered a meal

Am I correct in saying this?

Regards.

Marco Dias


Ok, not to sound like a dork or anything, but I would not use the word 'problem' but maybe 'pointed considerations.' I have worked with excellent photographers who throughout the day we looked out for each other, and the flipside photographer who was worthless.

The meal is more of an expectation or not.

The low light is probably the consideration that you can address ahead of time, not to say it won't change.

My point is I wouldn't label any of these as being the top of anything. They are just items in a long list that needs to be discussed.

You could have all of these things taken care of and other things would go haywire.

The things listed above are probably some of the most consistent issues.

Dave Blackhurst March 1st, 2007 04:16 PM

To add to the last post...

#1 -YOU, the videographer are responsible to cover the "low light" issue - either have an adequate camera, or some form of supplemental light, don't "presume" anything, be prepared. Really shouldn't be a big "problem" if you've done your homework. Put the "use of lights" in your contract.

#2 -Generally the "golden rule" applies - treat the photog with respect, expect the same. Professional courtesy goes a long way, and you might find a good contact for more work if the gig goes well. A pro will respect that you both are there to do a job for the couple, and ego shouldn't get in the way of that. You both will be after some of the same angles/shots - anticipate, and decide who gets to shoot over whose shoulder in advance if needed - just be prepared and think ahead.

If another vendor is a jerk, the bride probably already knows it, don't make yourself the arse, do the best you can to work around him/her and point out the diffuiculties created by the vendor only if needed (preferably not on HER day).

#3 -As for food, the observation that there are usually empty chairs/absent guests is a good one - at least you're not a wedding crasher <wink>. Again, put it in the contract... to be safe. Some brides spend obscene amounts per guest for vittles, so perhaps this is why they are reluctant... if it's that upscale an event, you're under contract anyway, so just lay it all out.


I think that the one thing this discussion serves is to help a "prospective" or "learning" WV anticipate the POTENTIAL problems, and eliminate them BEFORE they BECOME problems.

Experiences of others are always good, because life throws curve balls, ya know? At the least, some of these "stories" are a good laugh, or can make us feel better about the time it happened to us and we felt so dumb... or maybe can give us insights so we don't repeat someone elses' mistakes. ALL GOOD STUFF!!

It's great that there are forums like this where we can come together and learn and improve!

DB>)

Jason Robinson March 2nd, 2007 02:04 PM

Light
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Blackhurst (Post 634240)
#1 -YOU, the videographer are responsible to cover the "low light" issue - either have an adequate camera, or some form of supplemental light, don't "presume" anything, be prepared. Really shouldn't be a big "problem" if you've done your homework. Put the "use of lights" in your contract.

Homework and equipment can only go so far before the needed light would ruin what the Bride wanted. I tell them I won't use a light (first off I never owned one) and then I give suggestsions for turning up lights for important moments or changing locations ,etc. But I make them fully aware of what they will get should they go for that candle lit dance. So far all of the problem locations have had brides that are OK with the results since they were warned ahead of time.

jason

Alan Craig March 2nd, 2007 02:59 PM

dxxk heads who walk in front of cam
 
what is worse than dxxk heads who walk in front of your cam are those who actualy turn round to cam and say sorry. And then there is the person who walks upto you while you have your eye glued to the eyecup and say excuse me your not filming are you only I'd just.............? I'm sure we have all had that experience at one time or another.

Peter Jefferson March 4th, 2007 03:14 AM

lol
shot a morning wedding yesterday.. was at the brides just before 9, ready to go by 940...
photographer arrives about 925... h ehad apaprently told her to not dress until he got there.. 'bride rushes now..
ceremony starts at 10...
945.. me supposed to be out, bride not dressed yet..
photog stressing (mind u he WAS late.. )
im stresing coz im supposed to be on the road and brides not ready..
photog hogs all shooting opps..
10am.. needed to gt afew shots of bride while she was already in certain positions.. asked her to hang back 15-20secs so i can get my shots.. photog being rude and saying cmon cmon
poor bride is a lil stressd here.. but knows i need to get my shots..
photog hogs the girls and literally shoves me as i take my shots..
photog gets all he needs and takes off..
I still need at least 2 shots before i leave.. just some detail of teh bride finaly dressed.. by this time, its 10 past 10.. ceremony as supposed to start at 10..

ok, so i head of and tell the bride to not do anythign once shegets to the ceremony and sees me.. once she sees me she knows shes safe..
well.. being a clifftop wedding, i also had to set up lights coz of the intense backlighting..
so i get to the ceremony locations.. turns out that headstart i asked for ddnt happen and they took a shortcut.. so i told the phtoog, 6 minutes for me to set up..
Now, im late becuase he hogged her in the morning, now despite my efforts, i still ahve some signiature shots which she had specifically asked for.. so all i can do is blame him for the time factor here cosz he was late as it was..

anyways.. ceremony starts.. all good.. things all happening to plan..

get to the phtooshoot..
wanted to get afew intimate shots of teh couple, now, this is where it gets funny.. all the while hes shooting my compositions over my shoulder.. ok fair enough..
BUT as we head back to the cars, i turn to him and say "sorry for stepping in there, but this is the only time i have to reallyshow the intimacy of teh couple, so i stepped in as u were handling the bridal party.
He's like.. yeah, thats ok if u step in.. but the thing is.. your slow..
Now this blew me away..
so funny but i just turned to him and said.. well of the 60jobs i do each year and oever the last 6 yers, ive never been called slow.. then again, my shots go for 15odd seconds so if thats considered slow...

anywyas.. to cut a long story short.
back at teh reception, i pretend as if he didnt say anythign and talk to him as normal. his partner, whos older and obviously more expereinced, turns and says thanks for being a fast composer and letting them take my shots
LOL

oh and the best hit..
lunchtime hits, were all at the reception..
Im givien a booth along th ewall and teh phtoographers are given seating with the guests..
To top it off, they decided to bump the speeches forward, BUT the photog desicdes to do family shots after theyve had their break.. cool i say.. 15 20 minutes..

no...
it went for an hour and half... by 3pm they were still at it...
reception was to finish at 5...
ok i step out and ask bride whats going on..
i also tell her im nto going to film people standing around taking photos..
she also knew i had teh shits tht the fotog not only delayed her, but he also got in my way numerous times and make snide comments in front of her..

I walk away..
320 and they decide to walk back in..
speeches now.. wonderful...
cake...
wow..
430pm now and time for the waltz.. lol
hmm.. great party... how much did she pay per head? How much dancing happened?
Nada.. once the bnridal waltz happened, dessert was served and people hammered the wine until they were shattered..

Oh what a wonderful country we live in... when photographers can dictate and ruin a wedding simply becuase they need to feed their egos. the worse thing about it is when brides are docile enough to let them...

Denis Danatzko March 4th, 2007 09:26 AM

Wow...all these horror stories
 
get me to wondering:

So many folks here have so much experience, does anyone try to prevent - or at least address - such problems in their contract? Seems to me that both the vid and photog are going to want the same, or nearly the same, angle for shots. Is it really that difficult to work out things like that with the photogs?

As for either the vid or photog being late, is it inapprorpiate to discuss that with b&g/parents prior to signing of the contract? Seems to me that a photog being late hints at their level commitment to the job.

I know the prep and ceremonies are stressful, and "things change" as the day progresses, but holding things up for a late photog strikes me as something the photog s/b "penalized" for, i.e. if he/she are late, their fee s/b reduced, if only as a means of compensation for extra stress and "pain and hardship" suffered by the b&g, the wedding party, and the parents, (not to mention at the church and banquest hall, particularly if another event is scheduled to follow).

I probably sound naieve, and I've only ever shot weddings for close friends and family, but it's stories like these that lead me to want to avoid them altogether.

Peter Jefferson March 4th, 2007 10:10 AM

So many folks here have so much experience, does anyone try to prevent - or at least address - such problems in their contract?
((thats why it exists.. to cover my ass in case of out of control situations like this one.. ))

Seems to me that both the vid and photog are going to want the same, or nearly the same, angle for shots. Is it really that difficult to work out things like that with the photogs?
((No, far from it.. most photogs i work with love my style of being discrete then stepping in only as i need to... BUT with teh space i give them, i at least expect half of that in return.. as an example, if i want 5 mons with the B/G at the photoshoot, the photog should have the decency to let me take them for a while.. if he wants to tag along hes more than welcome, but this si my time i have with them, so i do try to get some intimacy happening with the couple and if he continually steps in, then i'll speak up.
Gotta remember that most photogs havent worked with videographers, so to many of them, we are a hindrance to thier flow... ))

As for either the vid or photog being late, is it inapprorpiate to discuss that with b&g/parents prior to signing of the contract?

((No, its not, but i hold off on blaming other people for delays. the BG already know whos to blame, they dont need me to point it out to them. Wht I do mention though, is that the client must provide sufficient time and or location for me to have teh ability to shoot. If they dotn provide a tripod safe area, or dont want to have shots composed by me, they ned to mention it in the contract. ))

Seems to me that a photog being late hints at their level commitment to the job.

((well this dude himself didnt have the tendency to want to experiment ro to try new things.. he was set in his ways as are most people.. pity he lost quite afew opportunities simply due to his ego overinflating itself so much he lost site of the job at hand.. ))

I know the prep and ceremonies are stressful, and "things change" as the day progresses, but holding things up for a late photog strikes me as something the photog s/b "penalized" for, i.e. if he/she are late, their fee s/b reduced,
((well we dont knwo why they were late.. it could have ben traffic or maybe he slept in.. irrespctive of why, we deal with the now.. so long as the results for teh time of the shoot are up to scratch, time doesnt mean much.. especially for a wedding.. ))

if only as a means of compensation for extra stress and "pain and hardship" suffered by the b&g, the wedding party, and the parents, (not to mention at the church and banquest hall, particularly if another event is scheduled to follow).

((Well like i said, things like this hardly happen and when tehy do, it IS a big deal.. but the fact remains is that the guy is doing his job and is getting the shots he needs. If however he hinders me in achieving my shots, THATS when i step up to the client. If they want me to step in at that point, i will.. if they prefer the photog to call the shots, i let them..
Hey theyre paying me to do their bidding. If their stupid enough to neglect the product i am producing, and do not want to cooperate in a sense for me to achieve teh best i can with their day, thats their loss..
In the end, im there to archive the day, not change it, and if theyre happy for the day to be dictated by an idiot, thats their loss...
Hey, put it this way, she was not only late at her cereemony by about half an hour, but we ended up getting to the reception about half an hour late, in addition to the 90minutes it took for teh photogs to get the family shots..
Like i said.. her loss.. she jsut missed out on her wedding reception to appease the ego of a tardy photographer... )0

I probably sound naieve, and I've only ever shot weddings for close friends and family, but it's stories like these that lead me to want to avoid them altogether.
((meh.. u know what.. i went to the guys site and it turns out he's a bargain basement photog.. full of hot air and has m ade his way to where he is with the gift of the gab (ie, knows how to sell)
Thing is the area he works he's got nailed.. so hes always busy.. so hes smart in that regard.. as for his work.. put it this way, my 8yr old niece can do the same..

As for avoiding it, well think of the odds.. of the many photogs i work with regularly.. maybe one or 2 will have isue.. most of the time, the issues are stemming from them.. NOT my prescence..
Its also the newies who have issues co they dont know how to handle the idea of bouncing ideas to and fro..
This si where "photo video teams" really nail boutique studios like mine... they have the advantage as the photog and videographer have worked together, whereas in my stuation, i might work with the same 4 to 6 regulars most of the time, but 80% of my work is shot with a Photog ive never seen or heard of before
Thing is with these odds, 1 or 2 bad eggs doesnt stop me from doin what i do..
Aother thing to point out, is some photogs work closely wth other videographers.. so our presence there pisses them off and "for a laugh" they like the idea of stuffing up my shots.. hey, their buddy jsut mised out on a 3grand contract.. of course theyre going to be pissed..

They usually learn the hard way that this behaviour is unacceptable though..

Im a nice guy.. really i am.. but im thre as a professional. I leave my ego at the door and put my business hat on whenever i hold a camera..
Thing is, is to make sure they know you mean business..
if they think your a lill green, then you prolly are.. if your unsure, they will pick up on it.. if however you compose yourself with the knowledge and skill of a seasoned veteran (even if ur not) then they wont even try

Weddings are no place for egos..
its a shame some photogs forget that the wedding is about the bride and groom, not them..

Steven Davis July 22nd, 2007 08:45 AM

Well this is a new one on me.


The ceremony is all quiet, nice intimate, and all the sudden in my head phones I hear the unmistakable sound of someone winding up a disposable camera. wow.

Mark Ganglfinger July 22nd, 2007 02:22 PM

This is a very interesting thread and I do agree that some of these things are a little annoying. Fortunately, here in New England I don't see as much of these problems as the rest of you, except for the food issue. The lack of a meal becomes less of a problem when I have flashbacks of my 8 years working in a dingy factory on an assembly line cranking out ball joints and bringing my own sandwich every day!
I just throw some beef jerky and bottled water in the bag and call it good.
The only real problem is that I do tend to get real tired 2 hours into the reception if there is no where to sit.
Mark G

Dave Blackhurst July 22nd, 2007 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven Davis (Post 716595)
Well this is a new one on me.


The ceremony is all quiet, nice intimate, and all the sudden in my head phones I hear the unmistakable sound of someone winding up a disposable camera. wow.

Yep - I'm thinking of making up a sign "no Cameras or videotaping" - last wedding I did for friends was just chock full of amateur "photographers" blocking shots and generally screwing up the shoot (and YES, one was using a disposable camera...) - fortunately it was for friends, but yeesh - at least one guy had the decency to ask before shooting pix (he didn't block a single shot BTW), which I don't necessarily mind but don't stand through the processional to do it...

It's a tough call on how to deal with the proliferation of disposable cameras and digital cams with nifty sound effects so everyone knows you just took a picture...

I turn all the sounds OFF the minute I get a camera, just wish everyone else was smart enough to do it.

In the end you just have to shake your head sometimes and carry on...

I know that many photogs have a clause in their contract, and I've added one in myself after seeing how many bozos it takes to make a circus... anyone have any suggestions on how to enforce this at an "open" event?? I don't want to be rude, but on the other hand...

Travis Cossel July 22nd, 2007 04:15 PM

This was a new one for me this weekend. I had just finished setting up a camera and getting it positioned just right. This guest shows up and decides to take off his jacket . . . and the idiot walks over and hangs it on my tripod, bumping it out of position. I'm standing there, watching this, thinking . . "does my tripod/camera look like a freaking coat rack?!?".

I promptly walked over, took the jacket off of it, walked over to the guest and told him "Sorry, but you can't hang your jacket on my tripod. Thanks."

I swear I don't know how some people figure out how to get out of bed in the morning.

Kenneth Johnson July 22nd, 2007 06:07 PM

[QUOTE=Travis Cossel;716802]This was a new one for me this weekend. I had just finished setting up a camera and getting it positioned just right. This guest shows up and decides to take off his jacket . . . and the idiot walks over and hangs it on my tripod, bumping it out of position. I'm standing there, watching this, thinking . . "does my tripod/camera look like a freaking coat rack?!?".

I promptly walked over, took the jacket off of it, walked over to the guest and told him "Sorry, but you can't hang your jacket on my tripod. Thanks."

I would have taken the jacket off the tripod and left it on the ground, while walking all over it

Steven Davis July 22nd, 2007 07:19 PM

Years ago I went to a wedding where the bride had put a separate piece of paper in the program that was in neon saying, well I forget what it said, but I've thought of addressing this more closely at the contract signing. I would be glad to run to Office Depot and get the paper.

Travis Cossel July 22nd, 2007 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kenneth Johnson (Post 716844)
I would have taken the jacket off the tripod and left it on the ground, while walking all over it

I sure felt like it.

Dana Salsbury July 23rd, 2007 01:17 AM

I would've put the jacket on and acted like it was mine. ;o)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:43 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network