Joe Allen Rosenberger |
March 25th, 2007 04:50 PM |
I think Pats images alone and fine editing told a fantastic story, and the "need" for natuaral audio is not a "need" by any means....its mearly a subjective opinion, and we all have them.
Not every piece someone posts is going to have every element "one" thinks it should.
Pats work is without question some of the best work you will see around here and some of the best Ive seen in the wedding biz period.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darrell Aubert
(Post 648160)
Patrick, you have a good eye and you get solid shots. One thing I feel about your clip, however, is that I am disconnected from what is going on. As a videographer I recognize the well composed shots but as someone with no connection to the wedding, I feel like I'm watching a slideshow of really good pictures. There is no natural audio. To quote my good friend Glen Elliott, by not using natural audio you're not using all the tools available to you to tell the story. I have no idea what the people there sounded like, what their vows were, etc. etc.
Do you get what I'm saying?
|
|