DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   What Happens in Vegas... (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/what-happens-vegas/)
-   -   2.35:1 HDV aspect ratio: (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/what-happens-vegas/112041-2-35-1-hdv-aspect-ratio.html)

Dennis Murphy January 9th, 2008 06:23 PM

2.35:1 HDV aspect ratio:
 
I've recorded some video with my XHA1 using the 2.35:1 framing guide.

In Vegas 7, what is the best way to create this?
Do I use the pan & crop function, and if so, what would the new pixel dimensions be (it's HDV footage) 1440x?

Thanks for any help.

Steven Bills January 9th, 2008 08:21 PM

If you click on the Pan/Crop button at the end of the clip, you can see a drop down menu that says 'default'. If you click the drop down arrow, you'll find some cropping options for 4:3, 1:1, 1.78:1, and I think 1.85:1. You'll find that 2.35:1 is missing. So what I did was a little math (Width of Footage/Aspect you Want=New height of Footage -->1920/2.35=817) so what you'll need to do is hold either shift or control, (I can't recall right now), and then enter the new height value (817) on the left side of that window. Save that as your 2.35:1 crop preset, and you're all set.

Hope that helps, ask questions if it doesn't.

Steven

Mike Kujbida January 9th, 2008 09:33 PM

There's a thread on the Sony Vegas forum called Matte 1.85:1 ratio on 2.35:1 footage that you might find interesting.

Dennis Murphy January 10th, 2008 03:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven Bills (Post 805895)
New height of Footage -->1920/2.35=817)

But the HDV footage is 1440... can you please tell me how the 1920 correlates to that?

Cheers.

Thanks for the link Mike... that was interesting, but it didn't tell me how to get the 2.35:1 aspect ratio pixel height for 1440 pixel width.

I suck at math.

Cheers.

Mike Kujbida January 10th, 2008 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dennis Murphy (Post 806033)
But the HDV footage is 1440... can you please tell me how the 1920 correlates to that?

HDV has an aspect ratio of 1.333.
Multiply that by 1440 and you get 1920.

Quote:

...it didn't tell me how to get the 2.35:1 aspect ratio pixel height for 1440 pixel width.
I was hoping that the explanation by farss (3rd response in the thread) might be of some help.

Quote:

I suck at math.
Welcome to the club.
Televison was so much easier in the analog days :-)

Marty Baggen January 10th, 2008 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Kujbida (Post 806124)
Televison was so much easier in the analog days :-)

No it wasn't! =)

Mike Kujbida January 10th, 2008 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marty Baggen (Post 806134)
No it wasn't! =)

Troubleshooting was much easier because you had a pile ($$$) of dedicated machines that each did one job and one job only.
There were no codec issues to worry about.
The "portable" gear was much heavier which meant that you got a good workout on each and every shoot, whether you wanted to or not.

:-)

Dennis Murphy January 10th, 2008 12:05 PM

Cheers Mike!

Stuart Campbell January 13th, 2008 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Kujbida (Post 806139)
The "portable" gear was much heavier which meant that you got a good workout on each and every shoot, whether you wanted to or not.:-)

It was certainly heavier but at least the budgets were in place to pay for proper crews. A normal news item meant going out with

1:Reporter
2:Cameraman
3:Sound recordist
4:Lighting Operator (if required)

Now, it's just me and a reporter. In the future it'll just be the reporter (as is already happening and has been for a few years)!

Bring back heavy analogue kit! ha ha


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network