![]() |
Quote:
I'm pleased with the results using interpolate for deinterlacing (and resample disabled), but I'm curious as to why the smart resample does what it does - generate ghost images. |
That's a part of the motion blur. You shouldn't be seeing the ghosting when the picture is moving, which is why I say "stills don't tell much of the story."
|
Yeah, Vegas and DVFilm do it differently. In Vegas, on parts with heavy motion you'll see it alternate between one and two ghost images. In DVFilm you'll see it alternate between zero and one ghost images. In my opinion, when played back at regular speed the Vegas approach looks much smoother. If you didn't have the ghost images the motion would appear to studder and jerk along as the extra frames were dropped.
By the way, when you are doing a 24p render from 60i footage, if the camera moves are steady, the pans are slow, and you avoid zooms or at least use very slow zooms, the conversion will look pretty darned good. If you shoot like regular handheld video though it will look terrible. |
Quote:
Without resample: http://www.villamil.org/movies/istanbul-interpolate.mpg And with resample: http://www.villamil.org/movies/istanbul-resample.mpg The resampled clip does look smoother, in most of the frame. However, I find the ghosting quite visible. The clip without resampling looks more stuttery, but that's kind of the look I was going for... I guess resampling is doing what it is supposed to, which is averaging the source frames to generate a target frame, when there isn't an exact coincidence. ...so turning off resample is more a matter of the style I'm trying to achieve, I suppose. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network