|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 28th, 2004, 09:56 AM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 62
|
? about XL and 35mm film lenses
I've got a question about modding the XL1 with film lenses (like they did in 28 days later). The budget for that movie was around eight million, so I doubt it's a good indicator of how the picture will turn out with a similar approach on a 100,000 dollar film. Has anyone here shot with the XL1 and film glass? If so, let me know what you think. Also, I'm not a DP or anything, but I've heard digital video needs more light than shooting on film...anyone know anything about this?
Also, if anyone has experience trying to sell a digital feature all advice is welcome. I'm assuming it's much harder to sell than shooting 35mm, but then again, it's all hard to sell. Finally, if anyone here has any experience in the production and or sales of a digital feature that may be of use, please let me know. Thanks, Rick |
|
|
|
June 28th, 2004, 03:37 PM
|
#2 |
|
RED Code Chef
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
|
28 days threads on this forum:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...&threadid=6445 http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...threadid=11898 http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...threadid=11412 Most people that shoot with "film" (35mm) lenses will probably either rent or buy the mini35 adapter to allow a more cinematic feel and DOF. There are some people here on the boards who have used the adapter. See also this thread.
__________________
Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge | Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors |
|
|
|
|
June 28th, 2004, 05:00 PM
|
#3 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
The threads that Rob thoughtfully linked to will no doubt point out that "28 Days Later" was shot with prime lenses built for HD cameras, not film cameras. But that distinction is quickly blurring anyway.
As far as needing more light to shoot digitally, it depends. Film technology has improved to where some films are being shot entirely on high speed film stock that is more sensitive than digital cameras, however it is possible to boost the gain on digital cameras to meet that sensibility. Of course the picture quality will correspondingly suffer, but then again it's not as good to begin with. I would say that digital video requires at least the same amount of lighting and probably more attention than film, particular in exterior shooting conditions. It's certainly possible to shoot video in available light, but it's less likely to look "cinematic". A skilled DP can sometimes pull this off. The XL1s and Mini35 adaptor with cine lenses is a great look. The XL2 with the same front end is likely to be far greater. We'll have to see...! Here's some rumination on this setup.
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
|
|
|
|
June 29th, 2004, 02:04 AM
|
#4 |
|
RED Code Chef
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
|
Thanks for adding the link to the article Charles. That's one I
forgot about. Whoops.
__________________
Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge | Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors |
|
|
|
|
June 29th, 2004, 09:00 AM
|
#5 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 62
|
Thanks for taking the time to help me out. I really appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
