DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Canon EOS Full Frame for HD (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-eos-full-frame-hd/)
-   -   reviews of this camera (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-eos-full-frame-hd/236718-reviews-camera.html)

Brian Luce June 4th, 2009 04:16 AM

reviews of this camera
 
There aren't many comprehensive reviews of this camera out there. We know it does the shallow focus thing with the big chip, we know it's got low lighting abillity, but what about everything else? how much latitude? clean image or atifacts? Does it sample color at 422? Any shoot out?

Wayne Avanson June 4th, 2009 04:55 AM

I read a few general ones in photography magazines earlier in the year and there's one here
Canon EOS 5D Mark II review Cameralabs introduction

But I don't know if it's detailed enough for you. They all seem a bit 'general' to me.


Avey

Olof Ekbergh June 4th, 2009 05:59 AM

Here is a good review and he will probably do a follow up on new FW.


Canon EOS 5D Mark II Digital SLR Camera Review

Chad Jones June 4th, 2009 08:18 AM

Here's a shoot out from Zacuto I saw a few months back. It compares many different cameras to each other, including the 5d mkii.

Zacuto's Great Camera Shootout '08 on Vimeo

Julian Frost June 4th, 2009 06:10 PM

DPReview.com always does good reviews... Canon EOS 5D Mark II Review: 1. Introduction: Digital Photography Review

Brian Luce June 4th, 2009 09:17 PM

These are mainly links to the Canon's still photography capabilities. But this a video forum. I'm sure it takes awesome stills, but the vid quality? Still, not much useful info any where on web regarding this camera's efficacy for video. specifically, how good does this footage look? I've read some disturbing reports of bad aliasing but you've really got to dredge to get some good info.

Jon Fairhurst June 4th, 2009 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Luce (Post 1154251)
These are mainly links to the Canon's still photography capabilities. But this a video forum. I'm sure it takes awesome stills, but the vid quality? Still, not much useful info any where on web regarding this camera's efficacy for video. specifically, how good does this footage look? I've read some disturbing reports of bad aliasing but you've really got to dredge to get some good info.

As far as video goes, the positive points are:
* Great low light response
* Excellent DOF possibilities
* Best codec in its class (38Mbps h.264)
* Ability to create custom profiles that shape the 14-bit image before the encoder
* Ability to use a huge number of available lenses
* Manual control ;)

Negative points are:
* Aliasing on fine horizontal lines (I recommend using an optical softening filter)
* Rolling shutter artifacts (use good stabilization; avoid fast motion - except with the widest lenses)
* Blockiness on uniform surfaces (the codec is very good, but not perfect)
* Some feel that the noise reduction is excessive (contributes to above point)
* No 24/25p - yet. ;)

Like most tools, if you use it in the right setting with care, it can own its domain. "Reverie" is an example of what it shoots really well. Shoot handheld in bright light with fast motion and fine horizontal lines over uniform surfaces, and you'll be wishing you had used an HPX170 - if not a DVX100b.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:03 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network