DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Canon XH Series HDV Camcorders (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-xh-series-hdv-camcorders/)
-   -   Will DV mode improve XH-A1 low light? (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-xh-series-hdv-camcorders/130725-will-dv-mode-improve-xh-a1-low-light.html)

Greg Clark September 12th, 2008 10:02 PM

Will DV mode improve XH-A1 low light?
 
I found myself during two wedding receptions where low light ambiance could not be changed.
Would A1 recording in DV mode provide a substantial improvement?

Richard Hunter September 13th, 2008 01:52 AM

Hi Greg. I just tried this and could not see any difference in exposure between the 2 modes. If there is a difference it is definitely not "substantial".

Have you tried any of the low light presets? If these don't work for you the only real solution is an on-camera light, although this can often disturb the subjects if it's too bright. A dimmable light with diffusion is probably best.

Richard

Greg Clark September 13th, 2008 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard Hunter (Post 934150)
I just tried this and could not see any difference in exposure between the 2 modes.
Have you tried any of the low light presets? If these don't work for you the only real solution is an on-camera light Richard

No I haven't but definitely will try the low light presets. I have had mixed results using an on camera light. It definitely assists with low light but it is SO intrusive on the talent at the reception.
It is very disappointing to hear that DV mode and HDV mode are just about the same in a low light situation.

Bill Pryor September 13th, 2008 10:58 AM

There won't be any difference. What affects light sensitivity are the chips and the lens, not whether it's HD or SD. The higher the resolution of the same size chips, the smaller the pixels are and the lower their light gathering capability. I've found the camera to be pretty decent, for a 1/3" chip camera, in low light. I shoot at 24 fps, 1/48 shutter. For a wedding you probably could go down to 1/24 because there isn't a lot of fast movement in most cases. And of course, shoot at a wide angle so your lens doesn't stop down. You can go to a +3 with little degradation but +6 starts showing some. Unfortunately the first half of the word photography is photo...from the Greek photos, meaning light. It takes light. When they turn out the lights for a dance, even the excellent low light capabilities of a 2/3" chip camera like the DSR500 aren't good enough.

Joel Peregrine September 13th, 2008 03:25 PM

Hi Greg,

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg Clark (Post 934251)
I have had mixed results using an on camera light. It definitely assists with low light but it is SO intrusive on the talent at the reception.

Take the light off the camera. On-camera lighting isn't flattering and it draws attention to you because the light source is at eye level. Move the light to a stand or have an assistant with the light on a pole. More options are becoming available as people realize the benefits of off-camera lighting. It doesn't have to be intrusive and it leaves you to be more mobile and discreet. Just one way: The Wireless RECEPTION LIGHT by Darrell Boeck . You can DIY a similar set up yourself.

Bill Pryor September 13th, 2008 06:10 PM

That's a very handy thing to have, and not a bad price, considering the battery and remote.
You can also run a Lowel Omni with a 200 watt DC bulb from a cheap battery belt, but you'd have to come up with the remote on your own.

Greg Clark September 14th, 2008 08:18 AM

What would we do without DV Info??
 
Thanks to Richard, Bill and Joel for opening my mind to other alternatives for the dark wedding reception.
Bill you have given me the push to move from 60i and experiment with 24f.

Robin Miller September 14th, 2008 09:49 AM

Low light settings
 
Worst low-light situation I've tried taping with my XH-A1 was a poetry "slam" lit by nothing but candles. I used 24fps, 1/48 shutter, made sure the ND filter was OFF, exposure open wide, 3dB video gain. We're talking so little light that I could barely see the poets or audience with my naked eye, but I managed to make a clear record of the event despite the crummy conditions.

Stanley Law September 15th, 2008 03:21 AM

Low light is pretty bad. Your best bet is to always shoot in the highest res and then downres in post.

Art Varga December 16th, 2008 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joel Peregrine (Post 934329)
Just one way: The Wireless RECEPTION LIGHT by Darrell Boeck . You can DIY a similar set up yourself.

This looks like a nice product - the only thing it's missing is a dimmer, ideally controllable from the remote. Anyone know of anything or a way to add via a radio shack add-on or something?

Art


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:11 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network