|
|
#61 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 19
|
Hi Bryan,
You are absolutely correct! The data rate is set to unconstrained and not uncompressed. I agree it is a VERY important distinction and thank you for catching that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lexington, Ky - USA
Posts: 449
|
No problem, thanks for sharing your settings, I have always been less than thrilled with my youtube renders and might have to give your settings a whirl when i get some time.
__________________
www.TheVideoProfessional.com - PD170/ 2x-HD1000u - Ikan 8000HD- custom editing PC - Vegas Pro 8 & 9 - Premiere Pro CS4 - and a whole mess of other equipment... |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 602
|
I haven't seen a lot of chatter here about what people are using for an input file into Mpeg Streamclip. I'm working in Vegas, and in order to use Streamclip, I'd need to first export my project into a file (typically compressing in right) which would create one generation of quality loss.
Then you'd have to use Mpeg Streamclip to recompress the video to create a file suitable for uploading to Youtube, Vimeo, etc, etc... I shoot and work with HDV footage shot in 1440x1080i. What project settings should I be using to export footage to slip into Streamclip to get this kind of quality? Jon |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lexington, Ky - USA
Posts: 449
|
Jon, I am not very familiar with Streamclip (I just visited their site after reading your post.) What advantage do you see to using the secondary render versus using Vegas's renderer?
__________________
www.TheVideoProfessional.com - PD170/ 2x-HD1000u - Ikan 8000HD- custom editing PC - Vegas Pro 8 & 9 - Premiere Pro CS4 - and a whole mess of other equipment... |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 602
|
Most of the posts in this thread revolve around the common perception that using this software can enhance the look of your video as presented on youtube. Since good quality video on Youtube seems to be such a difficult thing to obtain, I'd like to learn the optimimum way to encode video for upload to the YouTube servers.
Jon |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta/USA
Posts: 1,800
|
Quote:
The next best would be your project intermediate. In my case, since I work with Edius, that would be Canopus HQ; I am not sure how Vegas works and also don't know if you're editing HDV natively or using some intermediate format (e. g. Cineform). The general idea would be to get the video out of your NLE and into Streamclip with no recompression; you can achieve that by using the project intermediate (your original video has already been converted to that format anyway).
__________________
Ervin |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||