DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   JVC Everio GZ-HD and GZ-HM Series (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/jvc-everio-gz-hd-gz-hm-series/)
-   -   JVC finally announces HD Everio!!! (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/jvc-everio-gz-hd-gz-hm-series/83341-jvc-finally-announces-hd-everio.html)

Steve Nunez January 7th, 2007 11:07 AM

JVC finally announces HD Everio!!!
 
Well guys if anyone out there has been waiting for a truly "tapeless" solution to high def videos- JVC has the answer by April 07-
(the kicker is it uses native FULL HD res and has a progressive sensor!!)

http://www.jvc.com/press/index.jsp?item=544&pageID

Brent Ethington January 7th, 2007 11:11 AM

but, unfortunately, it isn't capturing at full HD res (it only saves in full HD res)...

" Each of the three CCDs measures 1/5" with a gross pixel count of only 570K (1016 x 558). "

Heath McKnight January 7th, 2007 11:20 AM

Is that sensor size? Because the HVX's sensor size is 960x540 and uses, I believe, pixel shift, to go to 720p and 1080i cleanly.

Heath

Brent Ethington January 7th, 2007 11:24 AM

from the article...

"This translates to an effective pixel count of approximately 530K (976 x 548)."

while it may do it cleanly, it's still doubling (shifting, whatever) and not as high res as a native HD sensor (lower res than the canon XL/XH, for example). but, this probably accounts for the "low" price

Heath McKnight January 7th, 2007 11:29 AM

Interesting. I'd like to see this camera. Canon's http://hdvinfo.net/articles/canon/hv10overview.php HV10 apparently has a true 1920x1080 CMOS sensor! That would make it the largest sensor in the sub-$10,000 HD camera line-up.

hwm

Steve Nunez January 7th, 2007 11:32 AM

Did you guys notice it shoots to a modified mpeg-2 stream with a higher data rate than HDV! This camera is exactly what I've been looking for- of course JVC pioneers these things then Canon & Panasonic eclipse it with their versions......I'll get one the minute it's in stock........goodbye bulky Firestore FS4 HD and Canon XH-A1!

(Of course when Canon or Panasonic brings out their versions- I'll switch~LOL)

<Let's hope there are no issues with highlight clipping which seems to be a JVC issue with all their cams- to a degree>

Brent Ethington January 7th, 2007 11:32 AM

yes, I agree - the canon hv10, writing to full HD res would be pretty nice... :-)

Brent Ethington January 7th, 2007 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Nunez
Did you guys notice it shoots to a modified mpeg-2 stream with a higher data rate than HDV! This camera is exactly what I've been looking for- of course JVC pioneers these things then Canon & Panasonic eclipse it with their versions......I'll get one the minute it's in stock........goodbye bulky Firestore FS4 HD and Canon XH-A1!

(Of course when Canon or Panasonic brings out their versions- I'll switch~LOL)

it's 'only' 5mbps more (30mpbs vs 25mbps) - I wonder if they had to bump the rate up due to the the extra resolution it's writing to (1920x1080 vs 1440x1080 for HDV) versus getting better motion from it...

Steve Nunez January 7th, 2007 01:01 PM

I'm wondering if it shoots to m2t files or m2v for demuxing.....it's also slated for use with a BluRay buner for video archival- interesting setup JVC is going to put out- can't wait to see what it shoots like!

(The lens is supposedly of specs from their broadcast div)

Steve Nunez January 7th, 2007 01:18 PM

Some high res shots of it are here...

http://www.jvc.com/Resources/Documen...0/00/04/62.JPG

http://www.jvc.com/Resources/Documen...0/00/04/63.JPG
I wonder if a "mic-in jack" will be present?

Heath McKnight January 7th, 2007 01:44 PM

This already kicks the HD1/10's butt, so I'm kind of excited about it. Good behind-the-scenes camera, or a good primary camera.

heath

Cole McDonald January 7th, 2007 01:47 PM

Can anyone find the price point?

Steve Nunez January 7th, 2007 01:50 PM

$1799 Msrp

Heath McKnight January 7th, 2007 02:23 PM

Probably street lower, and over time, much lower. The HD1 still has an MSRP of $3100 or so, but you can pick one up for half that or so.

hwm

Paulo Teixeira January 7th, 2007 02:40 PM

The HC1 finally gets a worthy replacement even though it’s from a different company. We still have yet to see other camcorders such as from Sony and Panasonic.

Heath McKnight January 7th, 2007 02:47 PM

Paulo,

I'm guessing the AVCHD cameras will be it, though I wonder if there will be a new HDV Sony consumer camera. This thread talks about the disappearance of the HC3 at www.sonystyle.com, which Paulo pointed out that CES may have something:

http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=83024

heath

Steve Nunez January 7th, 2007 03:22 PM

Heath, let's hope no clipping problems.....I don't think it'll do 720p30- although 720p30 seems to be left behind with all the current 1080 cams coming out. I haven't been so excited about a cam since the XH A1!

Mark Goldberg January 7th, 2007 04:55 PM

This could be a great POV and backup cam for event work. There are a few important questions. What is the recording format? If AVCHD, does it include software to allow that to be editing with HDV material in an application like Vegas? Also important - does it have an external microphone jack? Sony nixed this on its C3 and Canon nixed it on their HV10.

Steve Nunez January 7th, 2007 05:02 PM

Mark- I believe I read somewhere JVC is not part of the consortium that supports cams that use the AVCHD format- so I'm pretty sure it wont shoot to that format.

Guy Barwood January 7th, 2007 05:30 PM

"and an HDV Compatible mode with a resolution of 1440 x 1080i"

So it doesn't really matter what other formats it can record in as you can always use this mode and import into any NLE that suppors native HDV.

What concerns me the most with this camera is:

Sensitivity (1/5" gona suk)
Mic in ability
Battery life (always a concern with JVC)
Manual control abilities
10x zoom isn't the greatest (& how wide is 3.3mm on a 1/5" 16:9 sensor)?

"Because the pixel-shift system uses progressive scan CCDs, signals are processed first as 1920 x 1080p progressive signals, then converted to 1920 x 1080i interlace signals for recording."

Does this mean that it is actually recording 1920x1080P? and just using an interlaced recording format to put it to disk (where two interlaced field can be used to form a single progressive frame).
I wonder if there will be a Pro version of this to come at NAB 2007?

Paulo Teixeira January 7th, 2007 05:48 PM

Guy Barwood,

In that press release, it mentions this:

“JVC’s newly developed Gigabrid engine improves picture quality throughout the line-up by integrating various noise reduction technologies to increase the signal-to-noise ratio by about 30 percent (3dB) over previous models. All 2007 Everio models feature shooting sensitivity equal to or better than previous models. CCD image sensors in the line-up range from 680k pixels to 5.37megapixels, tailored for various shooting needs.”

They still should have tried making the CCDs a little bit bigger considering the Panasonic SD1 has ¼” CCDs.

Guy Barwood January 7th, 2007 05:54 PM

Not to mention that JVC cameras are notoriously noisy in gain so this improvement 'may' get them at least closer to a level playing field with the likes of Sony. It certainly won't put them ahead though.

Steve Nunez January 7th, 2007 06:00 PM

If at the very least it eclipses the performance of the HD1/HD10U series- they'd be on the right track, 1/5" sensors are indeed small!

Jack Zhang January 7th, 2007 06:03 PM

Once again, we can't get the best of both the worlds of 1920x1080 CCD/CMOS chips and the world of square pixel 1920x1080 recording...

Hopefully later on this year a camera will come out in the under $10,000 range that provides all that AND a mic in.

Steve Nunez January 7th, 2007 09:09 PM

No one knows if this cam has "mic in" yet- but the original high end Everio MC500 3CCD camera did NOT have a mic in yet the newer revised 505 DOES- and it is a VERY similar form factor to this HD version- so we might be all surprised to find this HD version does have a mic in (surprised if it didn't).....we'll have to wait and see.

(If anyone here is going to the CES show- might you look into this apect??)

Guy Barwood January 7th, 2007 09:24 PM

While this looks like it will be a great little cam, even sensitivity might not be 'too' bad with a not too high pixel count CCD using offset for resolution and improved gain performance I am hoping this is showing the possibility of something like a Pro version of this at NAB which is only 3 months away.

I have to admit though I should not hold my breath, its not like JVC really have any other Pro version of a consumer cam. Pro & consumer don't seem to interact at all at JVC. The 10U and 1U both came from the Pro department didn't they? The Pro department have been pretty busy as well with the HD200 and HD250.

One can live in hope though.

Steve Nunez January 7th, 2007 09:34 PM

Guy- if I recall correctly- the HD10U was considered a "pro" model and handled via JVC's "pro" division as where the HD1U was considered a consumer camcorder and handled by the "consumer" division....I'd check with the forum dedicated to them- but I think they were different dept cams!

(I have owned both and still have a HD1U)

Guy Barwood January 7th, 2007 09:39 PM

Agreed that was the way they were marketed and maybe even distributed but I seriously doubt the consumer devision developed the 1U.

I'd rather see the Pro department make a consumer version of a Pro camera (like I think happened with the 10U/1U) than the consumer department try to make a "Pro" version of one of their models.

Its all speculation of course.

Derek Green January 8th, 2007 02:34 AM

Mic input confirmed.

http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/1195...hd7_camcorder/

Should be a nice little camera. Hopefully the picture quality is up to snuff. Sounds like they're being fairly conscious of the avg. consumer and throwing in a complete software editing solution with the package. Not that a video camera manufacturer would ever sell you a camera with an uneditable video format heh.

Shawn Kessler January 8th, 2007 05:28 AM

release date?
 
would be nice:)

Guy Barwood January 8th, 2007 06:58 AM

April 2007 for $1,799.95 RRP

Steve Nunez January 8th, 2007 11:46 AM

Seeing as to this cameras progressive scan CCD's- it'd be awesome if it offered some sort of "frame" mode or "progressive" mode......I'm keeping my fingers crossed for this one!!

Steve Nunez January 9th, 2007 09:38 PM

Big Ooooops by JVC....
 
Latest word is that this JVC will NOT have an "HDV" rec type format- this leaves us with NO native video type to use in our NLE's!!!!

I recall Chris Hurd saying HDV was developed as a "Tape" only format and I was indeed surprised JVC was able to encode on the fly to that format on the internal HD- I guess now we know this JVC can't do this ( I was hoping it would.)

So this sorta leaves us with raw video likely in M2T format that will have to be recoded to a NLE native format- meaning allot of time spent in conversions. This is the same scenario the Everio camcorders currently available leave us with as they record to a .mod file format which is a muxed mpeg2 stream with Dolby 5.1 audio. Mpegstreamclip is the encoder of choice for Mac users- I'm sure JVC will include a Windows solution.

This is a big thumbs down for ease of use as the files wont be able to be used right off the internal HD.

I'm still interested in the camcorder as it's the only 60GB HD HiDef camera and I'd rather convert video files than shoot to tape and capture etc.

If you guys learn anything new, please post your findings.

Heath McKnight January 9th, 2007 09:43 PM

I figured when they said it was going to a drive or memory stick, or whatever. HDV/.m2t MUST be on minidv tape to be called HDV. Not to say you can't record it onto a drive, but then it technically isn't HDV.

heath

Guy Barwood January 9th, 2007 09:43 PM

Whats wrong with M2T?

HDV is a tape only format so the camera, without a tape drive can not claim to be HDV but it can still record to disk a stream of video with the same codec specs as HDV records to tape. This is the same as you would get if you capture to your NLE without an intermediate codec.

Liquid imports M2T without the need for any conversions.

Steve Nunez January 9th, 2007 09:46 PM

If this is indeed the case- this is great news as a native type video is necessary to make NLE editing possible w/o re-encoding.

Here's a video showcasing it by a JVC rep

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...8918&q=jvc+hd7

Paulo Teixeira January 9th, 2007 09:47 PM

JVC HD Everio: Hands-On
 
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/ces2007/j...-hd-227549.php

Heath McKnight January 9th, 2007 09:47 PM

HDV is great; we shot my newest feature film on HDV, with the Z1u.

heath

Steve Nunez January 9th, 2007 09:54 PM

Paulo- good find!!!!

These next few months are gonna go real slowwwwwww.

Paulo Teixeira January 9th, 2007 10:18 PM

Steve Nunez,
At least you showed us a video of the unit. All we need now is the impress.watch site to get a hold of one and post video clips. In the bright side, since this is Mpeg2, anybody without a powerful computer will be able to view the footage naturally unlike AVCHD.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:35 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network