How to shoot a seamless take at different zooms at

Go Back   DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > Open DV Discussion

Open DV Discussion
For topics which don't fit into any of the other categories.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 8th, 2008, 12:57 PM   #1
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington, USA
Posts: 213
How to shoot a seamless take at different zooms

Hey gang,

I am looking for some guidance. I saw this video by Scott Kelby and really like how it's edited.. specifically how it's seamless dialogue, but the camera cuts in and out at different zoom levels while he's talking:

Does anyone know how this was done? Do you think they had multiple cameras rolling during the take? Or do you think they used 1 camera and did different takes at different zooms? Or do you think it was shot with just one camera at a wide zoom, and just zoomed in closer in post?

I am really interested in learning how to do something like this myself, so any helpful hints or advice on this would greatly be appreciated. Thanks!
Deke Ryland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2008, 01:32 PM   #2
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Apple Valley CA
Posts: 4,814
Hi Deke -

I think it's likely it was shot in one take, pretty seamless, although it's hard to tell without being able to go frame by frame - it did appear that the hand and head motions were seamless, not "cut together".

With the low res of YouToob, you could probably zoom in post, but it looked to me like there were slightly different angles, so I'm guessing at least two if not three cams were rolling.

I've been working on doing some similar stuff (really liked the lighting in that video, that's been my struggle), and multicam is a in my estimation the way to go. Lighted right, you can have several smaller cameras and get a great end result for about the same $ as one "big" cam. Shooting live events, I've come to the conclusion that 3-4 smaller cams will get a better end result than one or two big ones in terms of covering all the possible angles, unless you've got the luxury of a high budget shoot with manned cams!
Dave Blackhurst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2008, 01:54 PM   #3
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 256
If you are shooting in HD and delivering in SD or lower you could do this with one camera. There is enough resolution with HD to zoom in about 200% and still be at full SD resolution, so no softening of the image.
Lloyd Coleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30th, 2008, 10:38 PM   #4
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4
How to shoot a seamless take at different zooms

Looks like it was shot in at least two takes. Cuts come at the beginning of a sentence and it doesn't look like the shots had to match up much. I believe it was shot all the way through in medium, then all the way through in closeup.
Richard Andert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31st, 2008, 12:10 AM   #5
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
I'll agree with Richard - it is at least two takes, more likely 4, although some of the reframing could have been done in post. The edits take place at the natural rhythm of the speech, the mic was placed in a consistent position close to the subject in all cases so there's very little difference in timbre between the shots (though if you listen carefully there is a very slight difference in the wide shots versus the CUs), sounds like they were careful to use room tone to bridge any gaps in the edited speech, and the music also serves as a unifying bridging element to smooth the flow of the edited dialog. It also sounds like he is an accomplished presenter, used to producing a consistent delivery over repeated takes.
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams!
Steve House is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 1st, 2008, 11:50 AM   #6
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 2,924
Both techniques (multiple cameras on a single take vs one camera and multiple takes) can be successful. Results will vary based on things beyond equipment and production technique. The skill of the performer has an enormous impact on how good a single camera approach will look as does the complexity of the staging and the performance itself.

This was a pretty simple stage and setup. In my experience, differences in head, shoulder, arms and hands between takes will be noticable when you sit down to edit (when it's too late) and will dictate when you switch. In a more complicated staging and setup with multiple actors, handheld microphones etc... it gets harder to make multiple takes look good. Then there's the audio as mentioned previously with similar issues of technique and performance.

So, overall, if you look at it in terms of a range, multi-cam and multi-operator might be the best and then everything else is a comprimise off of that with varying effort/skill required in the perverbial "ummmm I'll fix that in post".
Les Wilson is offline   Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

Professional Video
(800) 833-4801
Portland, OR

Omega Broadcast
(512) 251-7778
Austin, TX

(973) 335-4460
Mountain Lakes, NJ

Abel Cine Tech
(888) 700-4416
N.Y. NY & L.A. CA

(800) 238-8480
Glendale, CA

Precision Camera
(800) 677-1023
Austin, TX

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > Open DV Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2015 The Digital Video Information Network