|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 3rd, 2012, 08:48 PM
|
#16 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: east coast
Posts: 91
|
Re: Lenses: Panny/olympus vs Other Brands
Lately I've been using the 14-42 and the 20mm for most of the video I have taken. These two lenses cover most of the shots I've been wanting to get. I do want a 50mm but the 14-42 covers my outdoor footage really well. I didn't like the lens at first but it's not a bad lens outside.
|
|
|
|
April 3rd, 2012, 10:55 PM
|
#17 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 8,425
|
Re: Lenses: Panny/olympus vs Other Brands
I think the 14-42mm is an outstanding video lens for outdoors.
|
|
|
|
|
April 4th, 2012, 09:12 AM
|
#18 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 366
|
Re: Lenses: Panny/olympus vs Other Brands
Good reviews on many of the Lumix lenses by Barry Green.
DVXuser.com -- The online community for filmmaking - My take on the Lumix lenses I've bought for the AF100 and GH2 Not listed are the Lumix 14mm f2.5 and 14-45mm f3.5-5.6 which are my personal favorites.
__________________
Dan Carter: HDC-TM700, DMC-GH2 and DMC-GH3, Sony RX100II and RX10, Final Cut Pro X http://www.vimeo.com/user582748 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
