|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 21st, 2006, 06:55 AM
|
#16 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta/USA
Posts: 2,515
|
This topic is not about HD and as I am not working HD yet, I have not looked into it... but a Google search brings up several of them.
For SD, reading this and other websites, Cinema Craft comes up as the winner (and an "ouch" on the pricetag, $2000), I personally tested Sorenson Squeeze and was pleased with the results (also excellent for encoding for the web - WinMedia, QT, Real, Flash). |
|
|
|
August 21st, 2006, 09:52 AM
|
#17 | |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: US
Posts: 1,152
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 29th, 2006, 06:00 PM
|
#18 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 5
|
I have tried Canopus encoder straight out of Premiere and the problem is still there. To answer a previous question I do encode in 5.1 Dolby as I have bought the Surcode rights. Just to clarify, the size of the file doesn’t matter to me as long as my problem is corrected and I receive good quality video. Thanks
Daniel |
|
|
|
|
August 30th, 2006, 06:39 AM
|
#19 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta/USA
Posts: 2,515
|
Yes, it depends
Yes Christopher - to quote you - it depends... the test Lars did lacks too many key "ingredients", so it might have brought out MainConcept on top on a certain type of footage, at a certain bitrate. Check out these pages for more complex tests with difficult to encode footage:
http://forum.videohelp.com/viewtopic.php?t=235665 http://www.tecoltd.com/enctest/enctest.htm As Lars admits himself, he used default settings... apples to oranges... |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
