|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 18th, 2003, 02:02 PM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 24
|
Sony wired Lav mike
I can't remember where I saw it but on one thread someone mentioned offhand that Sony has a decent lavalier, wired, at around $45. Does anyone have any more info on this?
__________________
Red means run, son. |
June 18th, 2003, 03:01 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Raleigh/Durham, North Carolina
Posts: 33
|
ECM-44b
The ECM-44b is the least expensive professional quality microphone that Sony makes, to the best of my knowledge. They cost a LOT more than $45!
__________________
http://www.wholmmovies.com/ website for the OTHER indie films |
June 18th, 2003, 04:13 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 127
|
|
June 21st, 2003, 12:40 AM | #4 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vallejo, California
Posts: 4,049
|
B&H sells them for $45
They are a bit susceptible to overload but otherwise do well with voice as in a wedding. I feed my MD recorder with one.
__________________
Mike Rehmus Hey, I can see the carrot at the end of the tunnel! |
June 21st, 2003, 09:31 AM | #5 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 24
|
Mike,
Is there a mdel number that you use? Thanks, Marcello
__________________
Red means run, son. |
June 22nd, 2003, 04:30 PM | #6 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vallejo, California
Posts: 4,049
|
Sony ECM-T145 is the model I have. Comes with an in-line but detachable power module for use with devices that don't have microphone power.
__________________
Mike Rehmus Hey, I can see the carrot at the end of the tunnel! |
April 2nd, 2004, 08:36 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lee's Summit, Missouri
Posts: 146
|
I am interested in purchasing the ECM-T145 also, but for some reason the product info page at B&H only mentions using it with a minidisk recorder, and not plugging it directly into the camera. I will eventually be adding a minidisk recorder and using this for weddings, but this lav mic can be plugged directly into the camera (GL2), right?
|
April 3rd, 2004, 11:13 AM | #8 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vallejo, California
Posts: 4,049
|
Yes it can as long as it is a Sony with the microphone power delivered via the socket. The in-line power setup is for devices that don't power the socket like, I believe, your GL-2
__________________
Mike Rehmus Hey, I can see the carrot at the end of the tunnel! |
April 3rd, 2004, 10:47 PM | #9 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 8
|
Mike you posted:
"They are a bit susceptible to overload but otherwise do well with voice as in a wedding." I have two of these and I haven't been able to use the audio from them in the last three weddings because: First wedding - tried to put it close to the piano and it overloaded Second wedding - tried to mic a singer and it overloaded both with singing and clapping from the crowd Third wedding - the reader went to the wrong podium on the wrong side of the stage...guess I can't fault the mic for that. Do yours overload this easily? I have them connected to the MD recorder (MZN707), the first time with the automatic gain and the second time in manual with it set very low. I haven't trusted them since...do they work well for voice _only_? I was wondering if I should look for something else for a general purpose mic. |
April 3rd, 2004, 11:07 PM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,922
|
It's a $45 mic. If it was all that good there would be no reason to buy an ECM44 or better. JMO
|
April 3rd, 2004, 11:53 PM | #11 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albany, NY 12210
Posts: 2,652
|
I used one for a wedding and it came out pretty good. They are definitely easy to overload. I'm guessing the mic itself is what overloads, not just the recorder. You can get fuzz without the levels overloading. No way would it work for a singer. I primarily wanted it to get the vows, and it's great for that, because the bride and groom typically don't talk that loud. It picked up the officiant pretty good too because he was standing a few feet from the couple and they're used to projecting for the audience. I also have a Shure SM-11 dynamic lav that's a lot harder to overload, but isn't as sensitive, so I guess it's a tradeoff. I would probably use the Shure next time.
|
April 4th, 2004, 12:15 AM | #12 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vallejo, California
Posts: 4,049
|
The SM-11 is as big as your thumb so it's not exactly subtle.
I use the Sony with a MD recorder as the second recording system for vows. The primary is a Sennheiser wireless. It is a voice-only microphone as far as I am concerned.
__________________
Mike Rehmus Hey, I can see the carrot at the end of the tunnel! |
April 4th, 2004, 10:52 AM | #13 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 8
|
Thanks guys, using it as a voice only for the groom sounds like a good idea with that kind of sensitivity. The farm boys around here get pretty quiet when it comes to vows! So far I've had great experiences with the Senn wireless systems but planned on the MDs as backup and I was getting pretty nervous about using them in the heat of battle. Has anyone tried the Azden EX-503 as a cheap MD backup mic?
|
| ||||||
|
|