Enhancing stereo from the house mixer at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > All Things Audio

All Things Audio
Everything Audio, from acquisition to postproduction.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 8th, 2005, 05:16 PM   #1
Fred Retread
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 1,227
Enhancing stereo from the house mixer

Maybe my earlier post was too wordy to bother with.

Let me try again. In my two main venues I've been taking a mono mix from the board into one channel and an AT3031 for room ambience iinto the other. Pretty good.

But two improvements I think I could make are:

1. to take L and R stereo from the mixer when available, and add the ambience mic to both channels.

QUESTION: Would a three-channel mixer be the best approach, or would it be better to record the ambience on a third track (in another device)?

2. to move the ambience mic up to the front on the general principle that closer to the source is better (it's currently at the rear, with the time delay corrected in post).

a) Would a good omni be a better choice than the AT3031 cardioid in that position (up front)?
b) If so, would a good wireless omni lav good enough for the frequency content and dynamics of musical events?
"Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence..." - Calvin Coolidge
"My brain is wired to want to know how other things are wired." - Me
David Ennis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2005, 07:01 AM   #2
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Burlington
Posts: 1,976
A 3 to 6 channel mixer would be a good choice to have for these activities. Even if you don't use all the channels for recording, it allows you to hook up multiple mics and audition them with a couple of button clicks during practice sessions. A mixer like a Mackie 1202-VLZ or 1402-VLZ also has enough extra inputs to allow monitoring the returns from the camera in mono, which is very important if you are recording multiple sources. Since you can't undo mixing in an ambient mic, monitoring in mono is the best way to hear that something isn't right.
A lot depends on what the house is really sending out on left and right and if that is really useful for the situation. It also depends on how much work you want to do in post. Recording the ambient mic on a separate recorder is safer, but obviously much more work for sync and drift issues. One way we haven't mentioned on this board to combat drift is to use a separate video recorder or camera in VCR mode. Record the video out from your main camera and the separate mics. This will be drift-free since it's locked to the main camera's video signal. And it gives you a spare recording of the video as backup. We've probably never mentioned it because people want to use multiple cameras for multiple viewpoints, and many cameras and VCR's do less well at audio recording than pure audio recorders do.
I would definitely move your ambient mic closer to the stage.
On the whole, I don't think an omni would be a better substitute for a cardioid. Sometimes it would, but many times it wouldn't.
I also think a wireless lav would be inferior to a 3031 or 3032 mounted in the same spot. A wireless lav would however be better than a regular mic that you mounted in a bad acoustic position because of safety or practical issues with running the cables from a good acoustic location.
Jay Massengill is offline   Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > All Things Audio

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:45 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2021 The Digital Video Information Network