|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 26th, 2010, 06:28 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: norman, OK
Posts: 111
|
where to get a cheap preamp/mixer?
I'm a sound mixer for a shoot and the director insists on the sound being inputted into the camera (one system instead of two). That's fine, but I want to be able to control the levels of each scene myself. Is there a cheap 1 or 2 channel mixer/preamp out there that shows the levels (so I can keep it from clipping or being too low)? I have one, but it doesn't show the levels. The smaller and lighter it is, the better. (it also has to have a headphone output as well as an XLR output)
|
July 26th, 2010, 06:33 AM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
How many mics in use at one time? Boom, wireless, or both?
Buying cheap and upgrading later is the most expensive in the long run. Buy decent pro quality once and be done with it. If the budget is tight, consider renting pro rather than buying cheap. I'd go with something like the Sound Devices field mixers - if 3 mics or less, the SD302 is an excellent choice, though not cheap.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! Last edited by Steve House; July 26th, 2010 at 08:10 AM. |
July 26th, 2010, 10:31 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 48
|
I recently bought a new field mixer at work and settled on the SD302. It is indeed a pleasure to use. Impressive quality. But it does cost about $1200.
Another mixer I looked at based on reviews and internet searching for a "cheap" mixer was the Sign Video ENG-44. It's about $500 on BH. I only mention it because I saw it's name mentioned a bunch as a decent cheap alternative--I've never used it and can't say anything about it from personal experience. Andrew |
July 26th, 2010, 12:04 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: norman, OK
Posts: 111
|
I only need one or two channels (only one boom mic) and I need to be able to see the levels (that's the most important part). Is there one out there with just one channel, XLR output, visible level meter, and a headphone jack? There just isn't enough money to spend more than $100-200 on it.
|
July 26th, 2010, 12:20 PM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Miami, FL USA
Posts: 1,505
|
+1 on the SignVideo mixer, I have used it and it's a nice piece of kit at a reasonable price.
The $200 price point is problematic, because you're hard pressed to find anything with a level meter there. Rolls makes some workable pieces...I have a couple stuck in my audio kit for things like pool-audio feeds...you can find them at bhphotovideo.com and and a good selection of Rolls and several other brands of low-cost audio devices here: Mini Mixers - Direct Pro Audio Good luck! |
July 26th, 2010, 12:21 PM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,420
|
IMHO, for that money you've gotta' rent. Or borrow or something. There's nothing you want to own in that price range.
__________________
30 years of pro media production. Vegas user since 1.0. Webcaster since 1997. Freelancer since 2000. College instructor since 2001. |
July 26th, 2010, 12:37 PM | #7 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
I have been using the Sign Eng44 for about 2 years now, and it has held up well, and operates flawlessly.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
July 26th, 2010, 01:08 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: norman, OK
Posts: 111
|
I have an old 4 channel mixer (although I'm not sure about the quality) with no levels on it. What about getting something like this:
American Audio AA-DB1 Low Cost 2 Channel Audio LED dB VU Meter Audio Level Meters at Markertek.com Although it only have RCA inputs/outputs so I'm not sure how that would work. XLR into the mixer, then out via RCA to the level meter and out again via RCA and then into the camera (not sure if there is an RCA input on the camera, there's an XLR input). |
July 26th, 2010, 01:21 PM | #9 |
DVCreators.Net
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 892
|
Another vote for Signvideo ENG44. I tested some of the Rolls devices and they were very hissy. In my quest for an inexpensive mixer, I also tested the Azden series, which were "sub par", also bought the SD302 - which is awesome and well built. I still think the ENG44 is among the best value out there. It is surprisingly "transparent" as we hear in this example:
|
July 26th, 2010, 04:23 PM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bristol, CT (Home of EPSN)
Posts: 1,192
|
Guy, thanks for taking time to do that test. In your opinion, did which had more noise, direct-to-camera or the Mixer version? Any other subjective thoughts?
|
July 27th, 2010, 04:33 AM | #11 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
Requires AC mains power for the power supply 19" wide rack mount device, not portable RCA connectors means it's unbalanced A toy to make an amp look cool, not a measurment instrument ... money thrown away You can't make a silk purse out of sows ear ... either find the budget to get a proper field mixer or better, rent one. Unless your shoot is taking a relatively long time, you can rent a proper mixer for far less money than you can buy a so-so one. In addition to level meters, the mixer you use also needs a reference tone generator to align and calibrate the camera's levels to the mixer. What camera are you going to? Saying that it has an XLR connector doesn't say much, XLR is simply a type of plug. What levels does it require? XLR can be mic level, consumer -10 line level, or professional +4 line level.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
July 27th, 2010, 08:09 AM | #12 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Napoli, Italy
Posts: 41
|
This is slightly out-of-budget but is the best for you
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/422113-REG/Azden_FMX_32.html |
July 27th, 2010, 10:47 AM | #13 |
DVCreators.Net
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 892
|
I was surprised at how close they were. My initial impressions upon playback were that the Mixer had a fuller low end. As far as noise, the cables and the mics were the same, you'd figure with the extra hop (mixer LINE OUT to camera LINE IN) that a slight hint of noise would be introduced, maybe you'd see a distinguishing comparison using test equipment, but to my ears, the noise level was the same.
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|