Is there a Good non-XLR shotgun mic? at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > All Things Audio

All Things Audio
Everything Audio, from acquisition to postproduction.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 12th, 2006, 01:41 PM   #1
New Boot
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East Texas
Posts: 13
Is there a Good non-XLR shotgun mic?

I am using a VX-2100 and shooting High School football games from the sidelines. The sound is not critical except for the pre-game locker room speech and the post-game speech to players and/or the local network interview with the coach. Since the camera is handheld for 4-5 hours, the added weight or bulk of an XLR adapter (Beachtek) is not a great option. There isn't much time to add and remove the adapter without missing some key shots at these times. If I have to go this route just to get decent audio for these two occasions it may be worth the trade off. Any other options or non-xlr mic recommendations are welcome.
Thanks
Steve Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 12th, 2006, 02:05 PM   #2
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: chattanooga, tn
Posts: 721
Two words: Rode videomic.
__________________
-->jarrod whaley.
www.oakstreetfilms.com
Jarrod Whaley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 12th, 2006, 02:07 PM   #3
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Clermont, FL.
Posts: 941
Your best option is the new Rode Stereo Videomic:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...ist&sku=450170

Your next best option is the older mono version:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...ughType=search
Laurence Kingston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 12th, 2006, 03:20 PM   #4
New Boot
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East Texas
Posts: 13
Rode

Thanks for the replies. I was already leaning toward the Rode. Am I reading correctly, that the Stereo VideoMic is cardioid and the original VideoMic is super-cardioid? If this is the case, would the mono version be more "focused" (suppress more noise from the sides)?
Thanks again.
Steve Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 12th, 2006, 03:38 PM   #5
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: chattanooga, tn
Posts: 721
You're definitely going to get more rejection of off-axis sounds from the mono videomic. No stereo mic is ever going to do that, because a tight pattern would make recording stereo information pretty pointless.

Stereo mics are probably best suited to recording ambient sound, or maybe live musical performances. For recording dialogue or voice for video (in the field) a shotgun is a better choice.
__________________
-->jarrod whaley.
www.oakstreetfilms.com
Jarrod Whaley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 12th, 2006, 07:40 PM   #6
New Boot
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East Texas
Posts: 13
Rode

I ordered the Rode VideoMic.
Thanks for the input.
Steve Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 13th, 2006, 01:21 AM   #7
Major Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: israel
Posts: 296
ambient de have much better product
www.ambient .de
Oleg Kaizerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 14th, 2006, 10:53 AM   #8
Major Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 425
Just be aware that the signal level from the mono VideoMic is very "hot", compared to other mini-jack mics (e.g. Sennheiser MKE300). If you are setting manual audio levels on your VX2100, it's probably not a problem. My Canon XM-1 is auto only, and I find I need to switch on the "MIC ATT", which attenuates the incoming audio signal (by -12bB? -25 dB?), otherwise the ALC is on all the time and I get no variation in volume and occassional distortion.

Also, the Rode is rather sensitive to the wind (again, compared to the MKE300), so make sure you have a good wind gag when working outside. I find that Rode's own "dead cat" hairy cover is not good enough.

I own both the mono VideoMic and the MKE300, and although the frequency response of the Rode is better, I tend to use the Sennheiser unless there's no wind.
__________________
Steam Age Pictures - videos in aid of railway preservation societies.
Mark Fry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 14th, 2006, 12:55 PM   #9
Major Player
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 844
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Fry
Just be aware that the signal level from the mono VideoMic is very "hot", compared to other mini-jack mics (e.g. Sennheiser MKE300). If you are setting manual audio levels on your VX2100, it's probably not a problem. My Canon XM-1 is auto only, and I find I need to switch on the "MIC ATT", which attenuates the incoming audio signal (by -12bB? -25 dB?), otherwise the ALC is on all the time and I get no variation in volume and occassional distortion.

Also, the Rode is rather sensitive to the wind (again, compared to the MKE300), so make sure you have a good wind gag when working outside. I find that Rode's own "dead cat" hairy cover is not good enough.

I own both the mono VideoMic and the MKE300, and although the frequency response of the Rode is better, I tend to use the Sennheiser unless there's no wind.
totally agree with Mark. Videomic is great, but it IS very hot and i agree too that the Deadcat isn't enough wind protection for it. It reduces wind noise for sure, but in a stiff wind you still get wind-noise which is annoying.
Maybe Rycote or Lightwave Equalizer will give better results.
Stu Holmes is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > All Things Audio

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:16 AM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network